2017 Released Flashcards
Audit engagement team members should remain alert for evidence of noncompliance with which of the following relevant ethical requirements?
A. Maintaining a suspicious attitude, presuming that the client is dishonest until evidence proves
otherwise.
B. Performing professional responsibilities with the highest sense of integrity.
C. Performing audit procedures efficiently and within expected time budgets.
D. Maintaining confidentiality of client information by not including it in the audit documentation.
A. Incorrect. Audit team members should maintain an attitude of professional skepticism, rather than a
suspicious attitude presuming that the client is dishonest until evidence proves otherwise.
B. Correct! Integrity involves maintaining confidentially of client information, performing audit procedures
efficiently, and maintaining profession skepticism. Audit team members should maintain an attitude of
professional skepticism, rather than a suspicious attitude presuming that the client is dishonest until
evidence proves otherwise. Audit team members should strive to perform procedures efficiently; however, more time than budgeted may be required by evidence uncovered during the audit. Some client
information must be included in audit documentation for it to be complete. An auditor maintains client
confidentiality by safeguarding client information, including the information in audit documentation.
C. Incorrect. Audit team members should strive to perform procedures efficiently; however, more time
than budgeted may be required by evidence uncovered during the audit.
D. Incorrect. Some client information must be included in audit documentation for it to be complete. An
auditor maintains client confidentiality by safeguarding client information, including the information in audit
documentation.
According to the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct, which of the following records must a CPA return to the client when requested?
A. Client-provided records, even if fees are due to the CPA for the engagement and are unpaid.
B. Client-provided records requested for a second time because the client misplaced the first set of
records.
C. Supporting records prepared by the CPA consisting of adjusting, closing, combining, or consolidating entries prior to the completion of the engagement.
D. The CPA’s working papers consisting of analyses and schedules prepared by the client at the CPA’s request.
A. Correct! Client records belong to the client regardless of whether fees for the related engagement are unpaid; however, a CPA need not provide records more than once. Supporting records prepared by the
CPA prior to the completion of the engagement might be incomplete. As they are not a finished product
and could reveal information the CPA would prefer not to release to an employee potentially committing
fraud or theft, the CPA may be especially reluctant to share them with the client. The CPA’s records need
not be supplied to the client unless there is some agreement to do so or the client’s records are
incomplete without them. Even if the client’s records are incomplete without the records, they need not be
supplied during the engagement or until fees are paid. Typically, the CPA’s working papers belong to the
CPA and need not ever be supplied to the client.
B. Incorrect. Client records belong to the client regardless of whether fees for the related engagement are unpaid; however, a CPA need not provide records more than once.
C. Incorrect. Supporting records prepared by the CPA prior to the completion of the engagement might be
incomplete. As they are not a finished product and could reveal information the CPA would prefer not to
release to an employee potentially committing fraud or theft, the CPA may be especially reluctant to share
them with the client. The CPA’s records need not be supplied to the client unless there is some
agreement to do so or the client’s records are incomplete without them. Even if the client’s records are incomplete without the records, they need not be supplied during the engagement or until fees are paid.
D. Incorrect. Typically, the CPA’s working papers belong to the CPA and need not ever be supplied to
the client.
Which of the following is a requirement for accepting an attestation engagement to report on the controls at a service organization?
A. The description of the controls is completed prior to the signing of the engagement letter.
B. The service auditor has the competence and capability to perform the engagement.
C. The suitability of the evaluation criteria is reviewed by a third party.
D. Management agrees that the service auditor will be responsible for documenting the controls.
A. Incorrect. The description of the controls need not be complete prior to the signing of the engagement
letter as long as the auditor has a reasonable expectation that the engagement can be completed. The auditor’s examination may result in suggestions to management about changes to the description.
B. Correct! An auditor must have competence and capability to perform any engagement accepted.
The description of the controls need not be complete prior to the signing of the engagement letter as long
as the auditor has a reasonable expectation that the engagement can be completed. The auditor’s
examination may result in suggestions to management about changes to the description. The criteria for
each attestation engagement is not reviewed by a third party. A CPA uses professional judgment to
determine appropriate criteria and discloses the criteria in the report on the controls. Readers of the
report may decide if the criteria is suitable for their needs. If a CPA is responsible for documenting the
controls, the CPA is not independent with regard to them and, thus, may not also attest regarding them.
C. Incorrect. The criteria for each attestation engagement is not reviewed by a third party. A CPA uses professional judgment to determine appropriate criteria and discloses the criteria in the report on the
controls. Readers of the report may decide if the criteria is suitable for their needs.
D. Incorrect. If a CPA is responsible for documenting the controls, the CPA is not independent with regard
to them and thus may not also attest regarding them.
An accountant agreed to perform a compilation of a company’s financial statements under Statements of Standards for Accounting and Review Services (SSARS). During fieldwork, the accountant decided to perform some analytical procedures. Which of the following would the accountant do related to the compilation engagement?
A. Issue a review report because review procedures were performed.
B. Issue an audit report because audit procedures were performed.
C. Withdraw from the engagement because review procedures were performed on a compilation
engagement.
D. Issue a compilation report even though review procedures were performed on the engagement.
A. Incorrect. As a compilation was performed, a compilation report should be issued. There is no
prohibition against performing analytical procedures for a compilation. The performance of some
analytical procedures do not constitute a review.
B. Incorrect. As a compilation was performed, a compilation report should be issued. There is no
prohibition against performing analytical procedures for a compilation. The performance of some
analytical procedures do not constitute an audit.
C. Incorrect. As a compilation was performed, a compilation report should be issued. There is no
prohibition against performing analytical procedures for a compilation.
D. Correct! As a compilation was performed, a compilation report should be issued. There is no
prohibition against performing analytical procedures for a compilation. The performance of some
analytical procedures do not constitute a review nor an audit.
Which of the following constitutes a potential risk associated with the use of information technology in an entity’s internal control structure?
A. A reduction in the ability to monitor the entity’s activities.
B. The facilitation of additional analyses.
C. A reduction in the circumvention of controls.
D. Unauthorized changes to systems.
A. Incorrect. Information technology can be designed to increase monitoring activities; monitoring
activities generally reduce risk.
B. Incorrect. Additional analyses generally reduce risk.
C. Incorrect. A reduction in the circumvention of controls generally reduces risk.
D. Correct! Information technology results in additional potential for unauthorized changes to systems, as
changes might not be detected readily. Information technology can be designed to increase monitoring
activities; monitoring activities generally reduce risk. Additional analyses generally reduce risk. A
reduction in the circumvention of controls generally reduces risk.
In planning an audit, an auditor should document in the working papers the auditor’s risk assessment of a material misstatement of the financial statements due to fraud. Which of the following should be included in workpaper documentation if risk factors are identified as being present?
A. A copy of the report of the risk factor to the company’s legal counsel.
B. Discussion of the risk factor with the client.
C. Investigation of the risk factor.
D. Those risk factors identified.
A. Incorrect. An auditor generally does not report risk factors to the company’s legal counsel.
B. Incorrect. In the planning stage particularly, discussion of risk factors with the client might not be
warranted, especially if the auditor believes that management potentially is involved in fraud. Later, some
identified risk factors may be considered immaterial or already understood by the client and thus not
require discussion.
C. Incorrect. While investigation of risk factors might be documented, identified risk factors must be
documented—making this a second-best answer. Further, risk factors might not be investigated.
D. Correct! The auditor is required to document the consideration of fraud, including, the brainstorming
session; procedures performed to obtain information used to identify risks of material misstatement due to
fraud; identified risks of material misstatement; reasons revenue recognition was not considered a fraud
risk factor, if appropriate; results of procedures performed in response to risk of management override of
controls; other factors drawing the auditor to the conclusion that additional procedures were required; and
the nature of communication about fraud. An auditor generally does not report risk factors to the
company’s legal counsel. In the planning stage particularly, discussion of risk factors with the client
might not be warranted, especially if the auditor believes that management potentially is involved in fraud.
Later, some identified risk factors may be considered immaterial or already understood by the client and
thus not require discussion. While investigation of risk factors might be documented, identified risk
factors must be documented. Further, risk factors might not be investigated.
If new information becomes available that could require a reevaluation of the quantitative level of materiality applied during an audit of an issuer, then the auditor should
A. Not change the materiality level once it has been established.
B. Lower the materiality level, but not raise it.
C. Raise the materiality level, but not lower it.
D. Raise or lower the materiality level as appropriate to the situation.
A. Incorrect. The quantitative level of materiality should be appropriate given the auditor’s whole
understanding of the circumstances. An initial determination of the materiality level could have been
either too high or too low.
B. Incorrect. The quantitative level of materiality should be appropriate given the auditor’s whole
understanding of the circumstances. An initial determination of the materiality level could have been
either too high or too low.
C. Incorrect. The quantitative level of materiality should be appropriate given the auditor’s whole
understanding of the circumstances. An initial determination of the materiality level could have been
either too high or too low.
D. Correct! The quantitative level of materiality should be appropriate given the auditor’s whole
understanding of the circumstances. An initial determination of the materiality level could have been
either too high or too low.
If an auditor of a nonissuer discovers an unexpectedly high number of deviations during procedures
performed on a sample to test management’s review and approval of time sheets, then the auditor would most appropriately
A. Increase the tolerable rate of deviation.
B. Extrapolate the impact of the exceptions on other key controls requiring management review.
C. Propose an audit adjustment.
D. Increase the assessed risks of material misstatement.
A. Incorrect. An unexpectedly high number of deviations during procedures performed on a sample to test management’s review and approval of time sheets suggests the control is not performed as designed. The tolerable rate of deviation is the standard by which a control is evaluated; to increase the tolerable rate of deviation would be to lower the standard to accept sub-par performance.
B. Incorrect. An unexpectedly high number of deviations during procedures performed on a sample to test management’s review and approval of time sheets suggests the control is not performed as designed; it does not necessarily mean that other key controls requiring management review are not performed as designed.
C. Incorrect. An unexpectedly high number of deviations during procedures performed on a sample to test management’s review and approval of time sheets suggests the control is not performed as designed, but it does not necessarily mean that there are actually any errors or fraud present requiring an audit adjustment. Further investigation is required before an audit adjustment is proposed.
D. Correct! An unexpectedly high number of deviations during procedures performed on a sample to test
management’s review and approval of time sheets suggests the control is not performed as designed.
This would tend to increase the risk of material misstatement, but does not necessarily mean that other controls are not performed as designed or that there are actually any errors or fraud present. Further
investigation is required before an audit adjustment is proposed. Rather than extrapolating the impact of
the exceptions on other key controls, the auditor increases the assessed risk of material misstatement,
resulting in increased tests of key controls or increased substantive tests or both. The tolerable rate of
deviation is the standard by which a control is evaluated; one does not lower the standard to accept subpar performance.
During the review of work performed for a review engagement, the supervising accountant becomes aware that information provided by management is incorrect. In this situation, the accountant should
A. Make inquiries of management regarding the intent to commit fraud.
B. Conclude that the financial statements are misstated.
C. Disclaim an opinion due to a scope limitation.
D. Request that management consider the effect of the related matters on the financial statements.
A. Incorrect. Incorrect information received by management does not necessarily imply that management
intends to commit fraud; thus, such inquiries would be inappropriate.
B. Incorrect. Before concluding that the financial statements are misstated, the accountant would inquire
as to the accuracy of the information. Practically speaking, management will revise the financial
statements or bear the cost of the review as wasted expense, because the accountant could not provide
limited assurance on the financial statements, negating the point of the review. Generally, an accountant
should conclude that the financial statements are misstated only after getting a refusal to amend the
financial statements.
C. Incorrect. As a review involves providing limited assurance rather than expressing an opinion,
regardless of whether the information provided by management is correct or incorrect. Also, there is no
scope limitation—information is available, it merely is incorrect.
D. Correct! Before concluding that the financial statements are misstated, the accountant would inquire
as to the accuracy of the information and request that management consider the effect of the related
matters on the financial statements. Practically speaking, management will revise the financial statements
or bear the cost of the review as wasted expense, because the accountant could not provide limited
assurance on the financial statements, negating the point of the review. Generally, an accountant should
conclude that the financial statements are misstated only after getting a refusal to amend the financial
statements. Incorrect information received by management does not necessarily imply that management
intends to commit fraud; thus, such inquiries would be inappropriate. As a review involves providing
limited assurance rather than expressing an opinion, regardless of whether the information provided by
management is correct or incorrect. Also, there is no scope limitation—information is available, it merely
is incorrect
When determining whether uncorrected misstatements are material, individually or in the aggregate, an auditor of a nonissuer would consider each of the following, except
A. The particular circumstances of each misstatement.
B. The cost of correcting the misstatements.
C. The effect of uncorrected misstatements related to prior periods.
D. The size and nature of the misstatements.
A. Incorrect. The particular circumstances of a misstatement affect its materiality (i.e., the relative
importance of the misstatement).
B. Correct! Misstatements and omissions are considered material if they are expected to influence the
decisions a user will make based on the financial statements. The cost of correcting misstatements has
no bearing on whether they are material. The particular circumstances of a misstatement affect its
materiality. The effect of uncorrected misstatements related to prior periods could either cancel out the
current misstatements or magnify them. The size and nature of a misstatement affects its materiality. For
instance, if a misstatement occurred due to a misapplication of principle, the qualitative impact is
considerably different than if the misstatement occurred due to fraud.
C. Incorrect. The effect of uncorrected misstatements related to prior periods could either cancel out the
current misstatements or magnify them.
D. Incorrect. The size and nature of a misstatement affects its materiality (i.e., the relative importance of
the misstatement). For instance, if a misstatement occurred due to a misapplication of principle, the
qualitative impact is considerably different than if the misstatement occurred due to fraud.
Management should address written representations about a firm’s annual audit to the
A. Board of directors.
B. Firm’s attorneys.
C. Shareholders.
D. Auditor.
A. Incorrect. Management’s representation letter about a firm’s annual audit is not addressed to the board
of directors. The firm’s board of directors generally do not even see the representation letter.
B. Incorrect. Management’s representation letter about a firm’s annual audit is not addressed to firm’s
attorneys. The firm’s attorneys generally do not even see the representation letter.
C. Incorrect. Management’s representation letter about a firm’s annual audit is not addressed to the
shareholders. The firm’s shareholders generally do not even see the representation letter.
D. Correct! Management’s representation letter about a firm’s annual audit is addressed to the auditor.
The firm’s board of directors, attorneys, or shareholders generally do not even see the representation letter.
Before reissuing a company’s prior-year review report, an accountant becomes aware of information that may have a material effect on the prior-year’s financial statements. Which of the following actions would be most appropriate for the accountant to take?
A. Make inquiries to determine how the information will affect the prior-year financial statements.
B. Withdraw from the engagement and collect all outstanding fees.
C. Reissue the review report without performing any additional procedures.
D. Reissue the review report after obtaining management’s assurance that the information does not
affect the prior-year’s financial statements.
A. Correct! After becoming aware of information that may have a material effect on the prior-year’s
financial statements, an accountant must make inquiries to determine how the information will affect the
prior-year financial statements before re-issuing a review report. Withdrawal from the engagement would
be an excessive response. To ignore information that may have a material effect on the prior-year’s
financial statements and reissue the review report without performing any additional procedures to
determine their effect would be unethical. Management’s assurance that the information does not affect
the prior-year’s financial statements is insufficient to determine whether the information has a material
effect.
B. Incorrect. Withdrawal from the engagement would be an excessive response.
C. Incorrect. To ignore information that may have a material effect on the prior-year’s financial statements
and reissue the review report without performing any additional procedures to determine their effect
would be unethical.
D. Incorrect. Management’s assurance that the information does not affect the prior-year’s financial
statements is insufficient to determine whether the information has a material effect
If a nonissuer refuses to give permission to the auditor to communicate with its external legal counsel, then the auditor should modify which of the following?
A. The audit plan.
B. The management representation letter.
C. The attorney’s letter of inquiry.
D. The opinion in the auditor’s report.
A. Incorrect. While not contacting the attorney may in itself be a change to the audit plan, this is not the
best answer.
B. Incorrect. An auditor would seek the same representations from management regardless of whether
the client gives or refuses to give permission to the auditor to communicate with its external legal counsel.
C. Incorrect. If a nonissuer refuses to give permission to the auditor to communicate with its external legal
counsel, then it is pointless for the auditor to send a letter of inquiry to an attorney—the attorney will not
respond without the client’s permission.
D. Correct! If a nonissuer refuses to give permission to the auditor to communicate with its external legal
counsel, then the auditor must qualify or disclaim an opinion due to a scope limitation. While not
contacting the attorney may in itself be a change to the audit plan, this is not the best answer. An auditor
would seek the same representations from management regardless of whether the client gives or refuses
to give permission to the auditor to communicate with its external legal counsel. If a nonissuer refuses to
give permission to the auditor to communicate with its external legal counsel, then it is pointless for the
auditor to send a letter of inquiry to an attorney—the attorney will not respond without the client’s
permission.
A nonissuer engaged a practitioner to perform agreed-upon procedures on specified matters. The date of the practitioner’s report would ordinarily be determined by the occurrence of which of the following events?
A. The receipt of the signed engagement letter from the client.
B. The completion of the agreed-upon procedures.
C. The client’s review and approval of the contents of a draft report.
D. The delivery of the final report to the client.
A. Incorrect. The engagement letter typically is received before most of the engagement is performed; this
is too early for the date of the report on the engagement.
B. Correct! A practitioner’s report on the results of agreed-upon procedures is dated at completion of the
agreed-upon procedures. The engagement letter typically is received before most of the engagement is
performed; this is too early for the date of the report on the engagement. The practitioner accepts
responsibility for everything through the report date, but no more. The client’s review and approval of the
contents of a draft report is merely one step in the engagement. The completion of the agreed-upon
procedures occurs before the delivery of the final report to the client. While this could occur on the same
day, it is the completion of the agreed-upon procedures that determines the report date.
C. Incorrect. The practitioner accepts responsibility for everything through the report date, but no more.
The client’s review and approval of the contents of a draft report is merely one step in the engagement.
D. Incorrect. The practitioner accepts responsibility for everything through the report date, but no more.
The completion of the agreed-upon procedures occurs before the delivery of the final report to the client.
While this could occur on the same day, it is the completion of the agreed-upon procedures that
determines the report date.
If an accountant is performing a review engagement for a nonissuer and considers it necessary to communicate a matter that is not presented in the financial statements, then the accountant should include this information in which of the following paragraphs in the review report?
A. The opinion paragraph.
B. The introductory paragraph.
C. The other-matter paragraph.
D. The emphasis-of-matter paragraph.
A. Incorrect. There is a conclusion paragraph, but no opinion paragraph, in a review report.
B. Incorrect. The introductory paragraph of a review report identifies the entity and the financial
statements and explains what a review is and states that the accountant is not expressing an opinion.
The introductory paragraph is not the appropriate paragraph for an other matter, which would get its own
paragraph.
C. Correct! As the accountant is discussing matters not disclosed in the financial statements, an othermatter
paragraph is appropriate. There is a conclusion paragraph, but no opinion paragraph, in a
review report. The introductory paragraph of a review report identifies the entity and the financial
statements and explains what a review is and states that the accountant is not expressing an opinion. An
introductory paragraph is not an appropriate place for presenting an other matter, which would get its own
paragraph. An emphasis-of-matter paragraph is for matters appropriately disclosed in the financial
statements that the practitioner merely wants to emphasize. It is not for a matter that is omitted from the
financial statements.
D. Incorrect. An emphasis-of-matter paragraph is for matters appropriately disclosed in the financial
statements that the practitioner merely wants to emphasize. It is not for a matter that is omitted from the
financial statements.