2017 AS paper Flashcards
opportunity cost
value of the next best alternative foregone
production possibility frontier
the maximum potential output combinations of two goods an economy can achieve when all its resources are fully and efficiently employed
effect of an economy producing more capital goods
shift in PPF
define ‘base year’
- The year with which all other values in a series are compared
- Benchmark year
define ‘subsidies’
- government grant
- government policy
designed to encourage production or consumption - money given
how price mechanism responds to excess supply in a free market
- price mechanism = reallocation of resources caused by change in price level
- excess supply in free market when P above equilibrium P
- P then lowered signalling to producers to leave the market or produce less as it is less profitable which causes a contraction in supply
- incentive to consumers to buy more as cheaper, causing extension in demand curve
- Steel supply contracts, movement back along supply curve if drawn
- Extension in demand for steel, movement forwards along demand curve if drawn
- Surplus of steel gradually removed
- New market equilibrium identified
why reducing tuition fee cap may result in excess demand for university places
- lower price = more consumers willing and able to afford uni tuition
Application
1 mark for application to university education, e.g.
- Diagram indicates cut in tuition fees from £9 000 to £6 000
- Universities lack cash so close down departments
- University now more affordable for applicants
Analysis
- Lower maximum price illustrated or explained,
price below market equilibrium
- Extension in demand, movement forwards along
demand curve if drawn
- Contraction in supply of university places,
movement backwards along supply curve
benefits from university education
marginal social benefits exceed the marginal private benefits from university education
revenue
- quantity x price
- if demand falls, revenue falls
- original revenue = Pe x Qe
- falls to P1 x Q1
tobacco consumers switching to e-cigarettes is an example of rational behaviour (KAA)
Reasons rational
o Application – price of e-cigarettes per nicotine cheaper
o Data on PED suggests some rational response to price change e.g. 10% rise causes 4% fall in demand (Extract A)
Reasons rational
Smokers computationally aware of financial gains
of switching
Smokers informed of private health gains (Extract B Paragraph 2)
Reducing health external costs e.g. passive smoking (Extract A L15)
Smokers aware that regulations will increasingly
make it difficult for them to gain utility of nicotine consumption through tobacco smoking
tobacco consumers switching to e-cigarettes is an example of rational behaviour (Ev) Reasons against being rational
Smokers lack information and computational skills to accurately assess full costs and benefits of switching. May underestimate long-term gains of switching (bounded rationality)
Information overload
Both products contain nicotine which is addictive and habit forming.
If e-cigarettes were not available they may quit smoking altogether
Switch may be only short-term (impulse buying)
E-cigarettes complements tobacco smoking
resulting in an overall increase in nicotine consumption
PED for tobacco remains lower than e-cigarettes
so a price rise in the latter may result in a switch back
Peer pressure (herd mentality) pushing smokers to make the switch, may not be maximising welfare if prefer cigarettes
difficulty in computation, if consumers only presented the negatives of cigarettes won’t be able to make an informed decision so not maximising welfare
rational behaviour
idea that consumers aim to maximise their own welfare
XED
- measures the responsiveness of demand for good X following a change in the price of a related good Y
- % change in quantity demand X / % change in price Y
- postive = substitutes
- negative = complements
changes in price of tobacco cigarettes affecting the demand for e-cigarettes over time
e-cigarettes seen as less harmful so become more attractive compared to tobacco
cigarettes
tougher regulations and growing health awareness on tobacco
they are substitutes because they offer nicotine
applying cigarettes to diagram showing impact on e-cigarettes
relative price differences e.g. Figure 1 or tax rises on tobacco
use of numerical example e.g. a 10% rise in the price of tobacco cigarettes results in a less than 10% rise in demand for e-cigarettes
Analysis
the increase in the price of traditional cigarettes is resulting in the change in quantity demanded of e-cigarettes increasing
consideration of whether distant or close substitutes
diagram showing relationship between price of one of the product and demand for the other
magnitude/time
Reasons why tobacco cigarettes being relatively price-inelastic, e-cigarettes relatively price-elastic
habitual consumption
tobacco broadly defined
proportion of income spent on tobacco cigarettes lower than switching cost of buying
reusable e-cigarette kit
number of close substitutes
tobacco addictive necessity, e-cigarettes luxury (not yet addicted to).