20. Jury Selection (Rule 47/48) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the first procedure for jury selection (Rule 48)?

A

Venire

  • Choose reasonable cross-section of community
  • Ask potential jurors to appear in court
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the second procedure for jury selection (Rule 48)?

A

Voir Dire

  • Give questionnaire/Ask questions directly to jurors
  • Determine bias jurors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How may jurors be dismissed under Rule 47?

A

For cause (bias)

  • Expressly
  • Impliedly (Financially dependent on parties)

Peremptory

  • Any cause
  • NOT gender/race
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How many jurors are required at trial (Rule 48)?

A

Federal court

- 6-12 jurors (exact number to be decided by district rules/judge)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What happens if there are less than the required number of jurors at trial?

A

Hung jury => Must have retrial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is required to excuse a juror for cause?

A

Lack of impartiality

Financial interest in party (large/small)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How many attempts can be made to excuse jurors?

A

For cause
- Unlimited

Peremptory challenge

  • Max. 3 attempts
  • Each of multiple excusing parties gets 1 attempt
  • Multiple non-excusing Ps/Ds treated as single party
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is required to excuse a juror by peremptory challenge?

A

1) Any cause

2) NOT gender/race related
- Burden on excusing party => Burden on non-excusing party (preponderance of evidence required)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What can party do if other party makes pattern of peremptory challenges concerning gender/race?

A

1) Non-excusing party objects to challenges

2) Excusing party must meet burden of proof
- Challenge not concerning gender/race

3) Non-excusing party must meet burden of proof
- Challenge concerning gender/race
- By preponderance of evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly