2 Visual identification, opinion evidence and experts, and privilege Flashcards

1
Q

What 2 things need to differentiate?

A

Visual identification VS recognition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How does the law tries to avoid miscarriage of justice caused by visual ID?

A
  1. Code D of police codes of practice
  2. Turnbull directions
  3. Prohibition of dock IDs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is a visual identification evidence?

A

ID parade evidence.
Or naming the person. Recognition.

In both case, witness says that person IS the culprit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is not a visual identification evidence?

A
  1. Did not attend ID parade
  2. Only description evidence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

In cases of recognition, how does it relates to Code D ID parade?

A

It useless because witness is bound to select the person he recognises.

The judge will have to give dangers of visual IDs under turnbull!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What if defence stays witness is deliberately lying and he’s not mistaken?

A

Judge still gives a Turnbull direction if there is a possibility of genuine mistake.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How does defence use Pace Code D?

A
  1. Police have breached Pace Code D
  2. Evidence should be excluded under Pace 78
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the judge decides not to exclude the PACE Code D breach after vior dire?

A

He should generally tell the jury the provisions have been breached and warn them of any potential prejudice caused by the breach.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What if a witness gives dock ID while giving evidence?

A
  1. If there was a ID parade, then no problem.
  2. If there was no ID parade, judge should warn jury giving ID any weight or credibility.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

In recognition cases, can there be dock identification?

A

If there was a ID parade, can!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

When Turnbull directions must be given?

A

When case wholly or substantially rests on correctness visual identification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Does turnbull direction applies to Magistrates too?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What directions must judge give for Turnbull directions?

A
  1. Warn the jury the special need for caution
  2. If it’s recognition, tell them mistakes can be made with close family members
  3. For all cases (identification + recognition) tell them to examine the circumstances.
  4. Remind the jury weakness in evidence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What the judge have to do before letting the identification evidence go before jury?

A

Assess the quality of the ID evidence must be good. This can be done even without any supporting evidence!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

In deciding the quality of ID evidence before it goes to jury, can judge say police officers are more observant than regular people?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What if the quality of ID evidence is poor?

A

The judge should withdraw the case from jury and direct acquittal unless there are other supporting evidences for the ID.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What are examples of poor ID evidence?

A
  1. I am not quite certain
  2. I am 90% sure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What must judge do in relation to supporting evidence for ID evidence?

A

Must identify it for jury.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What are some supporting ID evidences that judge must identify for jury?

A
  1. previous convictions
  2. cell site or phone data at scene
  3. D’s lies
  4. Inference of silence at interview or at trial
  5. Another ID by different witness
20
Q

What is the impact of adequate turnbull direction?

A

Conviction being quashed

21
Q

What evidence can witness give? And what cannot?

A

Evidence of things he perceived. Witness cannot give evidence of opinion.

22
Q

What opinions can non experts give? Examples?

A

Matter that’s not calling for expertise, the witness is doing it to convey facts perceived by her.

Ie: Can say D has be drinking but cannot say whether he was fit to drive!

23
Q

How the competence of experts is examined?

A

Specialised experience, knowledge or study. Self certification not enough.

24
Q

If the competence of expert is issue what the court will do?

25
Who decides whether the matter required experts? What if it does't require.
The judge decides it. If it does't require then it is inadmissible.
26
What kind of evidence judges ruled against?
1. Psychologist cannot give evidence that memory fades over time. Everyone knows that. 2. Counsellors of victims of sexual crime cannot five evidence whether victim was telling the truth.
27
Is it possible to turn a witness into expert?
Can. If a police officer watches a video 40 times again and again.
28
What is the line that experts cannot overstep?
They cannot decide on ultimate issue. For example, psychologist can say why opinion can be unreliable but cannot say if it false.
29
What are some duty of expert?
Must inform the court and parties if asked things outside expertise or if opinion changed since the report.
30
Who the experts have primary duty duty to?
The court.
31
What should be done with the expert evidence? What is it's uncontradicted?
Jury use it to form their own judgement. It's wrong to direct the jury to accept the opinion just because it is un-contradicted.
32
What is there is only opinion on one side?
Judge can reject the opinion.
33
What are the 2 grounds admissible evidence can be excludes?
1. Privilege against self incrimination 2. Legal professional privilege
34
What the scope of privilege against self incrimination?
Other than Defendant, witness not bound to answer questions if, in opinion of judge, expose witness to criminal charge or penalty.
35
What if the prosecution undertake not to prosecute, does the privilege against self incrimination still exists?
Nooooo!
36
Who privilege against self incrimination covers?
Only witness himself and not spouse!
37
What are the categories of legal professional privilege?
Legal advice privilege Litigation privilege
38
What is scope of legal advice priviledge?
It extends to solicitor too
39
Who can waive legal advice priviledge?
The defendant ONLY! After D waives it, lawyer can talk!
40
What is litigation priviledge?
Communications between D or lawyer and third parties!
41
When litigation privilege applies?
Pending litigation only!
42
When can litigation privilege waived?
Same as legal advice privilege
43
When litigation privilege doesn't apply?
1. Furtherance of offence 2.
44
What if the lawyer didnt know about the crime or fraud?
Doesn't matter. The privilege doest apply still!
45
Waiver of privilege and s34 adverse inference
If D makes a no comment interview AND has evidence for reason for no comment interview.. then can tell the reason without waiving the priviledge.