2) Tort Law Flashcards
1
Q
Definition of tort
A
- A civil wrong committed against a person or property (real or personal) for which the court provides a remedy in the form of an action for money damages
2
Q
Tort law involved parties
A
- The person who sustains injury or suffers pecuniary damage as the result of tortious conduct is known as the plaintiff
- The person who is responsible for inflicting the injury and incurs liability for the damage is known as the defendant or tortfeasor
3
Q
Purposes of Tort Law
A
- Assessment of culpability
- Compensation
- Deterrence
- Vindicate legal rights and interests
4
Q
Additional effects of Tort Law
A
- Encourage innovation
- Increase costs of goods and services
5
Q
Three types of tort liabilities
A
- Intentional
- Negligent
- No-Fault
6
Q
Intentional tort
A
- Committed on purpose and done with the realization, to a substantial certainty, that harm would result
7
Q
Types of neglicence
A
- Misfeasance
- Nonfeasance
8
Q
Degrees of neglicence
A
- Ordinary Negligence: Failure to conform to a standard of care, inadvertence, neglect
- Gross Negligence: Wanton and willful disregard of the health and safety of others
9
Q
Elements of negligence
A
- Duty of Care
- Breach of Duty
- Injury
- Causation (preponderance of the evidence)
10
Q
Duty of care
A
- Obligation to conform to a standard of care
11
Q
Standard of care
A
- Describes what conduct is required of a person in a particular situation
12
Q
Duty of care is determined by
A
- Law or regulation
- Judicial determination
- Industry standards, institutional rules
- Peer testimony
- Conventional wisdom of jury
13
Q
Breach of duty
A
- Failure to conform to that obligation; deviation from recognized standard
- Often characterized as the standard of a “reasonable person of ordinary prudence” (includes concept of objectivity and foreseeability)
14
Q
Causation
A
- The act being the actual and legal cause of the injury
- Cause in fact; (“but-for”)
- Legal cause: (“foreseeability”)
- Would anyone of ordinary prudence and intelligence have anticipated the danger to others caused by his or her negligence?
15
Q
Res Ipsa Loquitor (speaks for itself)
A
- Sometimes there is a substitute for proof of causation
- The kind of thing that doesn’t happen absent one’s negligence
- The injury has to have been caused by an instrumentality or agency within the defendant’s control
- Must not have been caused by some voluntary action of plaintiff