2. Sources of Contemporary Ausralian Law Flashcards
What is adversarial system?
a system resolving legal conflicts used in common law countries such as United Kingdom and Australia that relies on the skill of representatives on each side.
What system of law has heavily influenced contemporary Australian law?
United Kingdom.
Define Statute law.
Statute law is law made by the parliment.
What is the difference between adversarial and inquisitorial system?
An adversarial system involves each side of a case (accuser and accused) gathering and presenting their own case, whereas an inquisitorial system involves the judge leading the discovery and presentation of evidence.
Outline the role and structure of parliament and the legislative process.
Role and Structure of Parliament and the Legislative Process
Role of Parliament
Parliament is the primary law-making body in Australia, responsible for creating, amending, and repealing laws. Its main functions include:
Legislating: Passing new laws and amending existing ones.
Representing the Public: Acting on behalf of the electorate’s interests.
Scrutinising the Government: Examining government actions through debates, committees, and question time.
Forming Government: The political party with the majority votes in the lower house forms the government.
Structure of Parliament
Parliament in Australia follows a bicameral system (two houses):
Lower House (House of Representatives)
Consists of 151 members, each representing an electoral division.
The government is formed by the party with the majority in this house.
Initiates most legislation, especially money bills (budget).
Upper House (Senate)
Comprises 76 senators (12 from each state and 2 from each territory).
Acts as a house of review, scrutinising and amending bills from the lower house.
Represents states and territories equally to ensure fair representation.
Crown (Governor-General)
The Queen’s representative in Australia.
Provides Royal Assent to bills before they become law.
Carries out ceremonial duties and ensures the constitution is upheld.
Legislative Process
Initiation of Bill: The proposed law is drafted.
First Reading: The bill is introduced to the lower house, with its title read out.
Second Reading: The bill is debated, and members discuss its purpose and principles.
Committee Stage: The bill is examined in detail, and amendments may be suggested.
Third Reading: The final version is debated and voted on.
Senate Consideration: The bill follows the same three readings in the Senate.
Royal Assent: If both houses agree, the Governor-General gives formal approval.
Commencement: The bill becomes law on a specified date.
This process ensures laws are thoroughly debated, fair, and align with democratic principles.
Describe the function of delegated legislation.
Delegated legislation refers to laws made by non-parliamentary bodies under the authority of an Act of Parliament. Parliament delegates its law-making power to government bodies, ministers, or local authorities to create detailed rules or regulations. This allows for more efficient and flexible law-making.
What is an Inquisitorial system?
a legal system where the court or a part of the court
(e.g. the judge) is actively involved in conducting the
trial and determining what questions to ask.
What is common law? How it may be used(3 ways)?
- Court-made law (as opposed to laws made by parliament or statute law)
- Law developed by the courts of common law, as distinct from the courts of equity.
- The system of court-based law used in the Unit
Summarize the development of common law?
British Legal System Development
- Anglo-Saxon England: Rights and obligations were decided based on local custom and disputes were resolved by local courts.
- Normans: Travelling judges applied a common set of laws to all areas of England, dealing with petitions from people who felt local courts were unjust.
- Australia: The system was brought over with the First Fleet, forming a legal system based on its own statute law and common law.
- Crimes: Offences were treated as wrongs for which the offender had to compensate the victim.
- Trial by ordeal: The defendant had to fast for three days and attend a special Mass before a painful task was given.
- Consolidation: William the Conqueror sent judges to administer a common set of laws, report on threats to the throne, and assess the country’s wealth for tax levies.
- Henry II: Royal justices were sent to listen to disputes, work out solutions, apply punishments, and ensure common rulings were made.
- Common law evolved from judicial decisions based on tradition, custom, and precedent.
Summarize the development of common law?
British Legal System Development
- Anglo-Saxon England: Rights and obligations were decided based on local custom and disputes were resolved by local courts.
- Normans: Travelling judges applied a common set of laws to all areas of England, dealing with petitions from people who felt local courts were unjust.
- Australia: The system was brought over with the First Fleet, forming a legal system based on its own statute law and common law.
- Crimes: Offences were treated as wrongs for which the offender had to compensate the victim.
- Trial by ordeal: The defendant had to fast for three days and attend a special Mass before a painful task was given.
- Consolidation: William the Conqueror sent judges to administer a common set of laws, report on threats to the throne, and assess the country’s wealth for tax levies.
- Henry II: Royal justices were sent to listen to disputes, work out solutions, apply punishments, and ensure common rulings were made.
- Common law evolved from judicial decisions based on tradition, custom, and precedent.
What is equity?
The body of the law that supplements the common law and corrects injustices by judging each case on its merits and applying principles of fairness.
Summarize the development of equity?
- The formal procedure for bringing a case in court was rigid in Anglo-Saxon times.
- By the fifteenth century, petitions were brought to the king claiming unjust decisions by common law courts.
- The Chancellor, a priest and judge, was tasked with handling these petitions.
- The Chancellor’s judgments were influenced by Christian principles, leading to the development of equity.
- The Court of Chancery, as a court of equity, based its decisions on the moral principles of equity.
- In the early seventeenth century, a dispute between the Chancellor and the Chief Justice of the King’s Bench was resolved through the intervention of King James I.
- In cases of conflict between common law and equity, equity prevails, and rules of equity always override common law.
- Equitable remedies for wrongs not recognized by common law include non-financial actions or setting aside unfair contracts.
- In the 1870s, the British parliament and the Australian colonies merged the courts of common law and equity.
What is precedent?
precedent a judgment that is authority for a legal principle and that serves to provide guidance for deciding cases that have similar
facts.
* A precedent is a previous judgment on similar circumstances, providing authority for the legal principle.
What is stare decisis?
‘the decision stands’; the doctrine that a decision must be followed by all lower courts
how is common law and case law developed
Common Law Overview
* Common law, or case law, is developed by judges in deciding cases.
how do judges resolve disputes? What is the purpose of doctrine of precedent or stare decisis?
- Common Law Overview
- Judges resolve disputes by considering previous decisions in similar cases.
- The doctrine of precedent or stare decisis ensures fair treatment and consistent law development.
- Old cases retain authority, allowing them to be used as basis for newer court cases.
What is the drawback of a doctrine of precedent?
- The doctrine limits a judge’s creativity in decision-making.
what principles do courts use?
- Courts use principles of existing common law and statute law to make decisions, considering social developments and common sense.
What creates more precedents
- New decisions create new precedents.
What role do courts play in relation to legislation disputes?
- Courts may resolve disputes about the meaning or application of legislation.
- Courts are expected to follow other courts’ interpretations of statutes, as a court decision doesn’t change the wording of legislation suggests parliament’s satisfaction with the court’s interpretation.
- A judge’s decision typically includes a ratio decidendi (essential legal reason) andobiter dicta (remarks about trial conduct), which do not set a precedent.
Why are courts expected to follow other courts’ interpretations of statutes?
Courts follow other courts’ interpretations because a court decision doesn’t change the wording of legislation, implying that parliament is satisfied with the court’s interpretation.
What is the ratio decidendi in a judge’s decision?
The ratio decidendi is the essential legal reason or principle behind a court’s decision, which forms the binding precedent.
What is the difference between ratio decidendi and obiter dicta?
Ratio decidendi is the binding legal reason for the decision, while obiter dicta are additional remarks made by the judge that do not form a binding precedent.
Name 3 cases where precedent does not have to be followed.
- Significant differences in facts or legal points from previous cases can distinguish a case.
- Higher court upholds appeal against lower court’s decision, reversing lower court’s decision.
- Courts can refuse to follow lower court’s decision, overruling lower court’s decision.