2 - Sources, Actors, Obligations and Responsibilities Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What do sources of law provide us with according to C. Chinkin?

A

the basis of legal obligation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Main characteristics of sources of IHRL? (6)

A

1/ how sources are recognized and used is essentially a normative choice

2/ mainly look to material sources for evidence of the content of a rule

3/ classical statement related to IL sources is Article 38(1) ICJ Statute

4/ however, Art. 38(1) is far from comprehensive and arguably not reflective of the diversity of sources used in practice

5/ there is a diversity of sources due to the fact the IHRL is a living and evolving body of law

6/ accordingly, there are formal and disputed sources of IHRL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the formal sources of IHRL? (4)

A

1/ treaties

2/ CIL

3/ general principles of law & judicial decisions

4/ teachings of the most highly qualified publicists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Characteristics of treaties as a source of IHRL? (2)

A

1/ centrality of int. and regional HR treaties

2/ by signature+ratification of a treaty, a State accepts to put constraints on the way it treats ind. within its territory and subject to its jurisdiction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the main categories of IHRL treaties? (7)

A

1/ International Bill of Rights

2/ UN HR treaty system (treaties & monitoring “treaty” bodies)

3/ treaties outside the UN treaty system

4/ regional HR treaties

5/ see also issue of reservations and declarations

6/ protocols to expand enforceability

7/ General Comments as sources of interpretative guidance (soft law)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the Int. Bill of Rights composed of? (3)

A

1/ UDHR

2/ ICCPR & its 2 Optional Protocols

3/ ICESCR & Optional Protocol

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Main treaties making up the UN HR treaty system? (7)

A

1/ ICERD (1965)

2/ CEDAW (1979)

3/ UNCAT (1984)

4/ CRC (1989)

5/ International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families (1990)

6/ Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (2006)

7/ International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (2006)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Main treaties outside UN HR treaty system? (5)

A

1/ Genocide Convention (1948)

2/ International Convention on the Suppression and Punishment of the Crime of Apartheid (1973)

3/ Refugee Convention (1951)

4/ ILO Conventions

5/ UNESCO Conventions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Principal regional HR treaties? (3)

A

1/ ECHR

2/ ACHR

3/ African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why are General Comments specific within the treaty category? (3)

A

1/ sources of interpretative guidance for scholars and States

2/ not based on State consent -> status of formal source of law hence uncertain

3/ can be seen as form of secondary treaty law or generating State practice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Main concerns regarding custom as source of IHRL? (3)

A

1/ malleable, can be used in different ways

2/ open to abuse

3/ identification of CIL subject to subjective perceptions and opinions and unconscious biases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does the existence of a customary norm require? (2)

A

1/ uniform and consistent State practice

2/ opinio juris - State belief the practice is required by law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Main difficulty regarding the use of custom as a source of IHRL? (3)

A

1/ int. courts and tribunals often very inconsistent in application of identification formula

2/ debate as to what the formula entails

3/ debate as to whether the formula has evolved to include modern forms of CIL identification

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Additional special characteristics of custom? (3)

A

1/ allow for no reservations

2/ can potentially bind NSAs

3/ jus cogens norms allow neither for exception nor derogation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Special characteristic of jus cogens norms? (2)

A

1/ universal application

2/ controversy on how jus cogens status is endowed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Characteristics of general principles as sources of IHRL? (3)

A

1/ often derived from national legal systems

2/ act as broad interpretative stepping stones

3/ limited practical application

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Characteristics of judicial decisions as sources of IHRL? (4)

A

1/ massively significant

2/ rich source of argumentative authority

3/ subsidiary means for determining IHRL rules

4/ impact of judicial dialogue on progressive dvpt IHRL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Characteristics of judicial dialogue in HR context? (4)

A

1/ can potentially be transformative as it is both horizontal and vertical

2/ judicial decisions can expose unconscious bias

3/ there is a role for strategic HR litigation

4/ fragmentation of HR jurisprudence can however potentially prevent enshrinement of universal standards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Characteristics of teachings of highly qualified publicists as sources of IHRL? (4)

A

1/ reliance on this source depends on maturity of the system

2/ subsidiary source

3/ weight attached varies from court to court, system to system

4/ includes outputs of Special Rapporteurs and NGOs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What are some disputed sources of IHRL? (3)

A

1/ outputs of treaty bodies

2/ resolutions of IOs

3/ other sources of soft law such as guidelines, codes of conduct, reports of UN organised global conferences, programmes for action, etc.

21
Q

What are some of the characteristics of resolutions of IOs as disputed sources of IHRL? (4)

A

1/ classically referred to as soft law

2/ can be relevant in the identification of custom

3/ can be useful indicators of State practice

4/ can lead to formal treaties

22
Q

General considerations about the nature of obligations and responsibilities under IHRL? (5)

A

1/ relationship between IHRL and PIL - unavoidable tension

2/ tension between the form and function of HR (purpose of protecting individuals from excesses of State power)

3/ nature of HR obligations often considered special in character (obligations of States towards ind.)

4/ HR obligations can take on a quasi-constitutional character (see Loizidou - ECHR is instrument of European public order)

5/ also erga omnes obligations owed towards all States (see ICJ Barcelona Traction)

23
Q

How can States modify their obligations under IHRL?

A

by making reservations

24
Q

Definition of a reservation? (5)

A

See Article 2(1)(d) VCLT

1/ unilateral statement

2/ made by a State

3/ when signing, ratifying, accepting, approving or acceding to a treaty

4/ whereby it purports to exclude or modify the legal effect of certain provisions

5/ in their application to that State

25
Q

Characteristics of reservations in IHRL? (7)

A

1/ they are a common feature in IHRL

2/ often relate to a State making clear that a certain right will only be interpreted in accordance with domestic, constitutional, or religious law

3/ can introduce cultural understanding of certain rights

4/ can be extremely problematic in HR context - constant debates about permissibility of a given reservation

5/ must not undermine object and purpose of treaty

6/ not permissible with respect to basic guarantees (eg right to a remedy)

7/ Requirements: must be specific and transparent - not general in nature

26
Q

What are the general principles regarding the implementation of HR obligations? (3)

A

States must :

1/ respect

2/ protect

3/ fulfil

27
Q

What does duty to “respect” HR mean?

A

State must not interfere with or deliberately violate HR

28
Q

What does duty to “protect” HR mean? (2)

A

1/ State must proactively ensure ind. within its jurisdiction do not suffer from HR violations

2/ must put in place structures of protection to prevent violations (Velasquez Rodriguez v Honduras)

29
Q

What does duty to “fulfil” mean? (2)

A

1/ State must take positive steps that lead to greater enjoyment of rights

2/ doing nothing is not an option

30
Q

Definition of limitation to HR obligations?

A

a limitation defines the scope of rights

31
Q

Characteristics of limitations to HR? (3)

A

1/ each treaty contains a specific “limitation clause” in relation to specific rights

2/ must satisfy certain conditions:

(i) proportionality
(ii) specificity
(iii) limited impingement on rights,
(iv) clear,
(v) accessible,
(vi) non-discriminatory,
(vii) pursue legitimate aim

3/ link with the notion of margin of appreciation

32
Q

Characteristics of the “margin of appreciation” ? (4)

A

1/ accepts uniform implementation is not desirable

2/ takes into account historical, political, social, and cultural factors

3/ invocation can sometimes be controversial

4/ defers to the State and domestic judicial bodies, esp. on issues where there are question marks as to global consensus

33
Q

Definition of derogations to HR? (4)

A

1/ legally mandated privilege

2/ of States

3/ to restrict certain ind. rights

4/ in the exceptional circumstances of emergency or war

34
Q

Characteristics of derogations to HR? (5)

A

1/ reflect adaptability of legal framework

2/ measures must be strictly required by exigencies of situation

3/ necessary to consider duration, geographic and temporal scope of emergency and derogation

4/ States bear the burden of establishing existence emergency

5/ emergency must be publicly declared - public must be informed

35
Q

What are the key requirements for a derogation to be considered legal? (3)

A

1/ emergency

2/ necessity

3/ proportionality

36
Q

Controversies surrounding derogations? (3)

A

1/ necessity for transparency and accountability

2/ but treaty bodies rarely actively monitored states of emergency

3/ can result in normalization of emergency

37
Q

Definition of non-derogable rights? (3)

A

1/ rights esp. protected under treaty law

2/ that cannot be limited or suspended

3/ regardless of the extent or source of the crisis faced by the State

38
Q

What are some non-derogable rights? (2)

A

1/ partially depends on the instrument (see ICCPR, ECHR)

2/ jus cogens norms

39
Q

What are the main forms of remedy for HR violations? (3)

A

1/ inter-State complaints

2/ individual complaints

3/ reporting obligations

40
Q

To whom do HR obligations, totally or partially, apply? (3)

A

1/ States

2/ IOs

3/ NSAs

41
Q

What are the basic premises of the scope of application of HR? (3)

A

1/ application to any State and person acting on behalf of a State

2/ HR apply to all ind. on territory or within jurisdiction of State (nationality is irrelevant)

3/ depending on instrument/mechanism, legal persons can have HR obligations (but not under UN treaties)

42
Q

When can an act/omission giving rise to a HR violation be attributed to a State? (4)

A

1/ violation derives directly from organs of the State

2/ see ARSIWA, for example Art. 8 (person or group of persons acting on the instructions of, or under the direction or control of a State)

3/ acts of IOs, depending on the context (who has control/authority?)

4/ sometimes resp. for actions of other States when the State exposed an ind. to a real risk of violation of his/her rights by another State + breach was reasonably foreseeable

43
Q

When can the acts of IOs be attributed to the State? (3)

A

1/ in peace-keeping operations, depends on who exercises control over troops

2/ actions of IOs on territory of the State usually attributed to IO (Blagojevic v NETH)

3/ authority and control seems to be a defining factor

44
Q

Do NSAs have HR obligations? (4)

A

1/ law is in a state of flux

2/ State-centric regime of IL => resistance

3/ could potentially impart legitimacy on entities deemed to be subversive

4/ is in the interest of victims and to the detriment of State power

45
Q

Do IOs have HR obligations? (5)

A

1/ IOs are bound by general rules of IL (ICJ, Interpretation of Agreement between WHO and Egypt)

2/ HR provisions in large part constitute general rules of IL

3/ enforcement and accountability is a whole other matter

4/ certain HR instruments allow IOs to become parties (ECHR allows EU)

5/ IOs = common agency of states. No reason different principles should apply to States acting alone/in unison

46
Q

What 2 cases exist on attributing actions of troops on IO mission to States?

A

1/ Behrami and Behrami v France: actions not attributabe to State since IO in complete control of troops at the moment

2/ Jaloud v Netherlands: actions attributable to NETH because troops under full command of NETH

47
Q

What case illustrates the principle of non-refoulement? (3)

A

1/ Soering v UK

2/ extradition to US: death row phenomenon amount to CIDT

3/ extradition contrary to rights under ECHR

48
Q

What legal rules apply to corporations? (3)

A

1/ UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights

2/ soft law principles (moral? responsibilities of MNEs)

3/ imposes obligations

(i) on states to ensure corporations respect HR
(ii) on corporations to avoid complicity in HR violations and use leverage to avoid violations