2. Prerequisites Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

marriage: rule

A

full application of CP requires legal marriage or RDP

BUT most principles also applicable if putative spouse or by estoppel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

valid marriage: def

A

1) capacity
2) formalities (license + solemnization by authorized official)
3) ok same sex

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

void marriage: def

A

incestuous or bigamous

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

voidable marriage: def

A

1) 1 part incapable of consent bc minority or unsound mind, OR
2) consent obtained by fraud or force

BUT if “v” party freely cohabitated w the other as spouses, then not voidable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

common law marriage: result

A

doesn’t exist in CA

–but if followed rules in another state, considered validly married in CA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

putative spouse: def

A

marriage is void or voidable BUT either party believed in good faith that marriage was valid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

putative marriage: result

A

quasi-marital property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

quasi-marital property: def

A

any property that would have been community or quasi-com paroperty if marriage had not been void or voidable

court divides (often same way)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

marriage by estoppel; def

A

1 party induces the other into marriage, knowing the marriage is invalid, by making promises he later doesn’t keep

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

marriage by estoppel: def

A

com property can attach to the otherwise invalid marraige

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

cohabitation: result

A

unmarried cohabitants have NO com property rights absent an enforceable agreement (presumption fo separate property)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Marvin Actions: def

A
  • -parties can contract w each other to create support obligation or ownership rship
  • -court has power to divide according to couple’s reasonable expectations during cohab
  • -fact that sexual rship is involved does not in itself invalidate agreement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

RDP def

A

only available to:

1) same sex partners, or
2) eligible elderly opposite-sex

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

eligible elderly opposite sex def

A

62+ and eligible for old age insurance benefits under the SSA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

RDP: result

A

same rights, protections, benefits, responsibiltiies, obligations as married

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

RDP: other states

A

if substantially equivalent, and legally contracted, CA will recognize as RDP

17
Q

analysis

A

1) valid marriage or RDP?
2) putative spouse? marriage by estoppel?
3) cohabitation / Marvin?