2) Prelims to Prosecution Flashcards
What police power are largely governed by PACE?
Several police powers are largely governed by PACE 1984:
- Arrest
- Detention
- Interrogation
- Entry & search of premises
What happens if someone breaches pace?
Breach of PACE does not make indv. Liable s.67(10) PACE 1975
- However, they are admissible as evidence in proceedings s.67(11) PACE 1984
Definition of interview
Interview =‘questioning of a person regarding the involvement or suspected involvement in criminal offence’
What happens to non-question in interview?
They are not admissible
Caution is generally needed before interview, what are the exceptions?
Caution not needed to:
- Establish ownership of vehicle
- Obtain info in accordance with statutory requirement (e.g. drink driving s.165 RTA)
- The furtherance of a search
- If Q’s go further, (did you intend to sell drugs) need caution
- The seek verification of a written record of comments
When does someone become a suspect in relation to interviews?
Suspect = ‘some reasonable, objective grounds for suspicion based on known fact or info’ Guidance 10A
- This means there can be some suspicion without requiring causation
- If indv. starts incriminating themselves, caution should be given (Ibrahim v UK)
Where must an interview be conducted?
GR and 4 exceptions
General rule - Should be at police station or authorised place of detention C11.1
Exceptions - Where delay would likely
- Interfere/Harm with evidence or other person
- Serious loss/ damage to property
- Alerting other suspects
- Hinder the recovery of property
Can a person be interviewed by live link?
Yes
What is the normal caution?
When can the specific word be deviated from?
“You do not have to say anything. But it may harm your defence if you do not mention when questioned something which you later rely on in court. Anything you do say maybe giving evidence.”
- Minor deviation is okay C10.7
- If suspect does not understand caution, should be given in own words
What is the altered caution?
When is it used and why?
When interview after charge, or has requested Sol. But not been able to consult with one, caution is:
“You do not have to say anything, but anything you do say may be given in evidence”
- This is because inferences cannot be drawn under ss.34,36 or 37 CJPO 1994
- Although Code C doesn’t require caution after charge, it should be given (R v Paul)
When is the special caution used?
Given when sus. Is interview after arrest, and asked to account for:
- object, mark or substance; or
- his presence at the place he was arrested
What happens if a caution is not given?
Does not necessarily result in the exclusion of evidence, compare (Armas-Rodrigues) & (Devani) with (Miller)
What info should and should not be given to the interviewee?
Must have enough info to understand the charge brought against them C.11.1A
- E.g. Sus. Arrested for theft, not told the victim has died (Kirk)
Does not include info which might prejudice the investigation
What info should the interviewee be given about legal advice?
Prior to commencement of interview, interviewing officer must remind sus. Of access to free legal advice C11.2
- Re. interview, what should be done with a significant statement or silence?
- What is a significant statement?
- After caution, interviewer must put any sig. statement or silence to sus. C11.4
- Sig. statement = one which appears capable of being used as evidence
What 5 things should the police not do in interview?
- Cannot use oppression
- Cannot indicate what action police will take if sus. Refuses/ answers a Q.
- Unless directly asked to do so
- Action stated must be proper and warranted C11.5
- Unless directly asked to do so
- Police should not seek a confession by offering a caution (R (U) v Metropolitan Police Commissioner)
- There is a positive duty on the police not to actively mislead a sus. (Imran and Hussain)
- Hypothetical questions should be approached with caution (Stringer)
Re. interviews, what constitutes oppression?
- Continued Q’s after repeated denials could be oppressive (Paris)
- Hectoring and bullying is oppressive (Beales)
- Rude questioning, raised voices and bad language not oppressive (Emmerson)
When should an interview cease?
When officer in charge thinks: C11.6
- all relevant questions have been put to the Sus; and
- Officer has taken account of other available evidence; and
- Reasonably believes there is sufficient evidence to provide realistic prospect of conviction
What should officer do when there is sufficient info to charge?
How does this change if suspect is detained for more than one offence?
When officer in charge of investigation believes there is enough information to charge, should take sus. into custody without delay.
- This would normally preclude further interviewing s.37(7) PACE
Where sus. Is detain for more than one offence, C16.1 allows delaying informing the custody officer until sufficient info for each offence
How must interviews in police station be recorded?
Visual recording not mandatory, but when used must have regard to Code F
Must be recorded using authorised recording device Code E2.1
What happens if interview not recorded?
Failure to record has lead to exclusions of evidence (Canale)
No always so (Walters)
What should be done with comments outside of interview?
Comments outside of interview must be recorded and where practicable sus. given opportunity to verify record C11.13