2): Pre-Action consideration and Steps Flashcards
Resolving a dispute through a civil claim
What are the preliminary considerations regarding the parties to a claim?
claimant makes the claim
defendant has claim made against them.
defendant must be traceable, identifiable and solvent.
What are the preliminary considerations regarding the causes of action?
solicitor must establish legal basis of claim (contract or tort)
assess likelihood of success by reviewing all available evidence
identify issues in dispute and how these are to be proved
give initial advice as to costs, liability and quantum
What are some common causes of action?
breach of contract
misrepresentation (contract)
negligence and negligence misstatement (Tort)
Nuisance (Tort)
What are the limitation periods for claims in contract and tort?
- contract:
start date: date of breach
time period: 6 years
- Tort (other than personal injury and latent damage):
start date: date damage occurs
time period: 6 years
- Tort (personal injury):
start date: later of: date cause of action occurs OR date of knowledge of person injured
Time period: 3 years
- Tort (latent damage):
Start date: later of: date damage occurs OR date claimant first had knowledge required to bring claim
Time Period: 6 years from date of damage OR 3 years from date of knowledge AND maximum 15 years from date of negligence
Will the court allow claims started outside the limitation period?
No they are statute barred.
What is the requirement on the parties for pre-action protocols?
prior to issuing proceedings, parties must comply with these
What is the Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct and Protocols (PDPACP)?
applies where no relevant pre-action protocol exists
What do the Pre-Action protocols and PDPACP do?
encourage quick resolution of cases without litigation by early and fair exchange of info
steps:
- parties should consider ADR with a view to settlement
- claimant should write to defendant with concise details of claim
- defendant should respond within reasonable time if claim if accepted and/or if there is counter claim
- parties should disclose key documents relevant to issues in dispute
- parties should take steps to narrow issues in dispute
What are the consequences for failing to follow Pre-Action Protocols and PDPACP?
includes a court order to:
pay other party’s costs (in full/part)
pay other party’s costs on indemnity basis
deprive claimant who has been awarded a sum of money, interest on that sum
require defendant to pat interest (10% above base rate on any damages awarded)
What are the mechanisms for determining which country’s law applies to a contractual or tortious claim issued in the courts of England and Wales?
choice of law/governing law clause:
English courts will generally respect a choice of English law (or that of another state) in same way as before Brexit
What are the limitations on the parties’ autonomy to select choice of law/governing law?
- mandatory rules of law of the forum where dispute will be heard may override governing law of the parties.
- statutory protections for the benefit of presumptively weak parties will override the parties’ choice of law
- choice of law may be refused if its application. is incompatible with public policy of jurisdiction in which dispute is being heard
- courts may not uphold the parties’ choice of law if it is not considered as bona fide
- courts may refuse application of foreign governing law if the contract is purely domestic
When does the European regime apply?
does not apply to proceedings instituted from 1 January 2021
instead these are governed by Common Law Rules or Hague Convention where applicable
What is the jurisdiction for Common Law Rules?
apply from 1 January 2021:
if a defendant is within the jurisdiction of the English court and is validly served, English court has jurisdiction
When may the English courts exercise jurisdiction?
Key common law gateways:
- defendant domiciled in England
- property in England
- injunction to do/not to do an act in England
- contract made in England or subject to English jurisdiction
- tort claims where damage in England or resulting from act in England
When may proceedings be stayed or jurisdiction declined?
there is a more appropriate forum
parties agree to refer to foreign courts or arbitration
dispute relates to foreign land/ intellectual property rights
proceedings amount to abuse of court’s process
When may a defendant lose/waive their right to contest jurisdiction?
by taking a step in the proceedings that is inconsistent with that right
AND
which may be seen as constituting a submission to the court’s jurisdiction