2 - Parliament and Parliamentary Sovereignty Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Parliamentary Sovereignty is…

A

as defined by Dicey: “Parliament, under the English constitution, has the right to make or unmake any law, and that no person has a right to override the legislation of Parliament.”

3 Key parts:
- Parliament is the supreme law making body and may enact or repeal any laws
- no parliament may be bound by a predecessor or bind a successor
- no other person may question the validity of an Act or declare that Act to be unlawful

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949

A

Constrained the HoL’s role and permits the Monarch to give Royal Assent to a bill that lacks the consent fo the HoL, provided that the speaker has certified it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

R (Jackson) v. Attorney General (2005)

A

Hunting Act Case. Suggested that the courts may be prepared to consider the valididty of an Act of Parliament.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Cheney v. Conn (1968)

A

Statute may override international law

(#1 unlimited legislative competence of Parliament)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Madzimbamuto v. Lardner-Burke (1969)

A

Statute may override constitutional conventions

this case concerned the Southern Rhodesia Act - convention that UK Parliament would not legilsate for S.R. w/out consent from their govt.

(#2 unlimited legislative competence of Parliament)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

R (miller) v. Secretary of State for Exiting the EU (2017) - Miller No1

A

Confims that statute may override constitutional conventions.

Facts: The Sewel convention says that Parliament will not normally legislate for Scotland without the Scottish Parliament’s consent.

Held: the Sewel Convention was not legally binding even though it had been codified;

(#2 unlimited legislative competence of Parliament)

Also, statute may abolsih or curtail aspects of the royal prerogative.
- as withdrawal from the EU = fundamental constitutional change by rmeoving EU law as a source of domestic law, needed Parliament’s consent.
(#4 unlimited legislative competence of Parliament)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Statute may alter the constitution

A

e.g. HRA 1998

(#3 unlimited legislative competence of Parliament)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Burmah Oil co v. Lord Advocate

A

Statute may operate retrosepctively

Facts - Oil sought compesnation for the destruction of oil instillations during WW2. HoL found the Crown liable to pay, but parliament enacted the war damage act 1965, which applied retrospectivelt and removed the right to compensation

(#4 unlimited legislative competence of Parliament)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Devolution - Scotland

A

Scotland Act 2012 gave additional powers over some aspects of taxation and other areas to the scottish parliament

Scotland Act 2016 Amends scotland act 1998 and
- Parliament will not legislate w regard to devolved matters w/out Scottish Parliament consent
- Scottish Parlaiment and Gov cant be abolsihed without a referendum vote

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Devolution of Northern Ireland

A

Northern Ireland Act 1998 devolved powers to a North Ireland Assembly and created a power sharing executive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Thoburn v. Sunderland City Council (2002)

A

Laws LJ stated that there are two types of statute, ordinary and constitutional.

Constitutional Statutes: Courts require actual intention from Parliament to change them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Constitutional Statute

A

Test:
- it must concern the legal relationship between citizen and state; or
- the statute must change the scope of fundamental constitutional rights

For it to be repealed, there must be express words indicating it to be repealed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

R (HS2 Alliance) v Transport Secretary [2014] UKSC 3

A

In obiter, if the Bill of Rights 1688 is a more fundamental statute than the ECA 1972, and was outside the contemplation of the Parliament when it enacted the ECA, it can take precedence over EU laws

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The Rule of Law - R (Jackson) v. Attorney General (2005)

A

Lord Steyn ruled that Parliamentary Sovereignty is not absolute and can be limited in some circumstances. He said that the courts could qualify the principle in exceptional circumstances to prevent Parliament from legislating in a manner that was contrary to the rule of law.

But Lord Bingham takes the stance that the Acts of Parliament take the highest legal authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly