2: Non-fatal offences Flashcards
(34 cards)
What is assault charged under
s39 CJA 1988
Maximum statutory sentence for assault
6 months imprisonment
What type of offence is assault/battery
Common Law
AR of assault
Include case
A physical act done by D that causes the V to apprehend immediate unlawful personal violence
R v Nelson
Explain ‘act’ / causes
- can’t be an omission; must be positive/voluntary act
- silent phone calls (Ireland)
- written or spoken word (Constanza)
- words can negate an assault (Tuberville v Savage)
normal rules of causation apply
explain ‘apprehend’
there must be apprehension (fear) (Logdon v DPP)
explain ‘immediate’
The definition of “immediate” doesn’t have to be instantaneous, can be ‘in the immediate future or imminent’
Smith v Supt of Woking
MR for assault
Include case
D must intend to make V fear immediate unlawful violence or be reckless as to whether such an apprehension is caused
Venna (recklessness is sufficient MR for assault)
What is battery charge under
s39 CJA 1988
Maximum mandatory sentence for battery
6 months imprisonment
What type of offence is battery
Common law
AR for battery
application of unlawful force onto V
explain application of force
“any touching of another person, however slight, may amount to battery” (Collins v Wilcock)
touching clothes is sufficient (Thomas)
can be indirect (Haystead, DPP v K)
can be an omission IF under a legal duty to act (DPP v Santa-Bermudez)
explain unlawful force
no consent and no pain or harm
not an arrest of detainment from police
MR for battery
include case
intention to apply unlawful force to another OR recklessness as to whether such force is applied
R v Venna
What is ABH charged under
s47 OAPA 1861
Maximum sentence for ABH
5 year’s imprisonment
Defenition of ABH
Assault occasioning actual bodily harm
AR for ABH
common assault that causes actual bodily harm
AR for ABH:
‘common assault’
Include cases
D must first commit an assault or battery
Assault: R v Nelson, R v Ireland, R v Constanza, Logdon v DPP, Smith v Supt of Woking, R v Venna
Battery: Collins v Wilcock, R v Thomas, R v Haystead, DPP v K, DPP v Santa-Bermudez, R v Venna
can be indirect DPP v K
AR for ABH:
‘occassioning’
means ‘causes’:
normal rules of causation apply (factual, legal, no breaks in chain)
AR for ABH:
‘actual bodily harm’
include cases
R v Chan Fook:
1) ‘actual’ means not so trivial as to be wholly insignificant
2) ‘harm’ is injury which goes beyond interference with the health and comfort of the V
3) ABH covers physical, psychiatric and clinical conditions but not emotions such as fear, distress or panic
Burstow: ‘bodily harm’ includes recognisable psychiatric illness
cutting hair (DPP v Smith)
loss of consciousness (R(T) v DPP)
MR for ABH
Include 3 cases
the same as for the common assault (assault or battery)
Roberts, Savage, Parmenter:
D doesn’t have to foresee or intend the harm
lower level of GBH
Malicious wounding or inflicting grievous bodily harm