2. Murder and manslaughter Offences Flashcards

1
Q

What are 3 things a person need to have in their state of mind to prove:

A

Intended to cause bodily injury to the deceased
Knew the injury was likely to cause death
Was reckless as to whether death ensued or no

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

If you are intending to charge offender with murder under s167 you must show that the defendant

A

Intended to cause death
Knew that death was likely to ensue
Was reckless that death would ensue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Killing in pursuit of an unlawful object

Caselaw

A

Desmond
Not only must the object be unlawful but also the accused must know that his act is likely to cause death. It must be shown that his knowledge accompanied the act causing death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Murphy caselaw

A

When proving an attempt to commit an offence it must be shown that the accuseds intention was to commit the substantive offence. For example, in a case of attempted murder it is necessary for the crown to establish an actual intent to kill.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Acts must be sufficiently proximate to the full offence

A

Generally to prove an attempt the defendant must have done or omitted to do some act that is/are sufficiently proximate to the full offence. Effectively the defendant must have started to commit the full offence and have gone beyond the phase of mere preparation - this is the all but rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Attempt to murder punishment

A

14 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the three differences between section 174 - counselling or attempting to procure murder and section 175 - conspiracy to murder

A

174 - murder not committed
Had to happen in NZ

175 - murder in NZ or elsewhere
Applies whether murder committed or not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is voluntary manslaughter?

A

Mitigating circumstances, such as a suicide pact, reduce what would ha e otherwise been murder to manslaughter even though the defendant made have intended to kill or cause GBH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is involuntary manslaughter?

A

Covers those types of unlawful killing in which the death caused by an unlawful act or gross negligence. In such cases there has been no intention to kill or cause GBH.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Newbury and Jones outlines 4 point test for proving an unlawful act for manslaughter

I
U
D
C

A

The defendant must intentionally do and act
The act must be unlawful
The act must be dangerous
The act must cause death

I
U
D
C

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the major departure yet in terms of gross negligence

A

Requires high degree of negligence corresponding with a common law standard of gross negligence
Objective test also required

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

2 question test for proximity

A

Following questions should be asked

  1. Has the offender done anything more than getting himself into a position from which he could embark on an actual attempt or
  2. Has the offender actually commenced execution, that is to say,!has he taken a step in the actual offence itself
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Mane caselaw accessory after the fact

A
C
T

C
O
C
Aaf

W
C
H

A

Mane
For a person to be an accessory the offence must be complete at the time of the criminals involvement.
One cannot be convicted of being an accessory after the fact of murder when the actus Reus of the alleged criminal conduct was wholly completed before the offence of homicide was completed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Killing is a sudden fight, things to consider.

A

You need to consider whether there was.

  1. Self defence
  2. The required mens rea for a murder charge

Acquitted for self defence
Manslaughter for required mens rea

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Piri case law - recklessness

A

Recklessness involves conscious, deliberate risk tasking. The degree of risk of death foreseen by the accused under either 167(b) or (d) must be more than negligible or remote. The accused must recognise a real and substantial risk that death would be caused

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

S72(1) attempts ingredients

H
D
G
W

A

(1) everyone who HAVING an intent to commit an offence, DOES or omits an act for the purpose of accomplishing his object, is GUILTY of an attempt to commit the offence intended, WHETHER in the circumstances it was possible to commit the offence or not

17
Q

Accessory after the fact to murder ingredients

A

176 everyone is liable to impriosnment for a term not exceeding 7 years who is an accessory after the fact to murder

Knowing any person to be party to murder
Recieves, comforts or assists that person
Or
Tampers with or actively suppresses any evidence against him in order to help him escape after arrest
Or
To avoid arrest or conviction

18
Q

Meaning of GBH

A

GBH means harm that is very serious such as injury to a vital organ