2. Murder and manslaughter Offences Flashcards
What are 3 things a person need to have in their state of mind to prove:
Intended to cause bodily injury to the deceased
Knew the injury was likely to cause death
Was reckless as to whether death ensued or no
If you are intending to charge offender with murder under s167 you must show that the defendant
Intended to cause death
Knew that death was likely to ensue
Was reckless that death would ensue
Killing in pursuit of an unlawful object
Caselaw
Desmond
Not only must the object be unlawful but also the accused must know that his act is likely to cause death. It must be shown that his knowledge accompanied the act causing death
Murphy caselaw
When proving an attempt to commit an offence it must be shown that the accuseds intention was to commit the substantive offence. For example, in a case of attempted murder it is necessary for the crown to establish an actual intent to kill.
Acts must be sufficiently proximate to the full offence
Generally to prove an attempt the defendant must have done or omitted to do some act that is/are sufficiently proximate to the full offence. Effectively the defendant must have started to commit the full offence and have gone beyond the phase of mere preparation - this is the all but rule
Attempt to murder punishment
14 years
What are the three differences between section 174 - counselling or attempting to procure murder and section 175 - conspiracy to murder
174 - murder not committed
Had to happen in NZ
175 - murder in NZ or elsewhere
Applies whether murder committed or not
What is voluntary manslaughter?
Mitigating circumstances, such as a suicide pact, reduce what would ha e otherwise been murder to manslaughter even though the defendant made have intended to kill or cause GBH
What is involuntary manslaughter?
Covers those types of unlawful killing in which the death caused by an unlawful act or gross negligence. In such cases there has been no intention to kill or cause GBH.
Newbury and Jones outlines 4 point test for proving an unlawful act for manslaughter
I
U
D
C
The defendant must intentionally do and act
The act must be unlawful
The act must be dangerous
The act must cause death
I
U
D
C
What is the major departure yet in terms of gross negligence
Requires high degree of negligence corresponding with a common law standard of gross negligence
Objective test also required
2 question test for proximity
Following questions should be asked
- Has the offender done anything more than getting himself into a position from which he could embark on an actual attempt or
- Has the offender actually commenced execution, that is to say,!has he taken a step in the actual offence itself
Mane caselaw accessory after the fact
A
C
T
C
O
C
Aaf
W
C
H
Mane
For a person to be an accessory the offence must be complete at the time of the criminals involvement.
One cannot be convicted of being an accessory after the fact of murder when the actus Reus of the alleged criminal conduct was wholly completed before the offence of homicide was completed
Killing is a sudden fight, things to consider.
You need to consider whether there was.
- Self defence
- The required mens rea for a murder charge
Acquitted for self defence
Manslaughter for required mens rea
Piri case law - recklessness
Recklessness involves conscious, deliberate risk tasking. The degree of risk of death foreseen by the accused under either 167(b) or (d) must be more than negligible or remote. The accused must recognise a real and substantial risk that death would be caused