2. I Am the Bread of Life Flashcards
- Context
- Discourse is delivered immediately after the Feeding of the 5000
- The discourse is a midrash on the preceding Sign
- Midrash: Jewish term for an interpretation of a Biblical passage.
• Follows a pattern in John’s Gospel: Jesus provides a Sign but people take it at its most literal level (ignoring the deeper level)
- Physical vs Spiritual
• Crowd has had it’s physical hunger satisfied by the loaves of bread
- Jesus intends to satisfy spiritual hunger for a close relationship with God.
- Jesus is offering spiritual bread that provides spiritual life
• “I am the bread of life. Whoever comes to me will never go hungry”
- Contrast with Moses
• Moses led the Israelites to the Promised Land.
• When they were starving, God sent them manna (bread)
• Jesus explains the Bread of Life is superior to manna.
- Manna did not stay fresh while Bread of Life will never spoil
- Those who ate manna eventually died and only their children reached promised land. Those who eat Jesus’ bread will have Eternal Life.
- Brown’s Interpretation
- Sapiential Theme: Jesus’ teachings
- Bread symbolises his teachings which will nourish people forever - Sacramental Theme: Symbolises the Eucharist
- Brown does not think Jesus really said these words (would have made no sense to Jews before the Eucharistic ceremony had been invented)
- Brown argues this theme was added later by John
- Implications
• John’s Gospel does not contain the Last Supper.
• However, this midrash serves the same purpose: sets up the Eucharist
• Christians are divided on how to interpret the Eucharist
- Roman Catholics: believe the bread and wine really becomes Christ’s body (transubstantiation)
- Protestants: believe bread and wine are purely symbolic
• John’s Gospel suggests that it is simply believing in Jesus is that is important.
Summary
- Context
- Physical vs Spiritual
- Contrast With Moses
- Brown’s Interpretation
- Implications