2: Historical, social, legal, and moral issues Flashcards

1
Q

Explain the earliest history of testing…

A

Early Antecedents

Testing advancements mainly in the last century, with roots traced back over 4000 years to China’s civil service testing program, including;

oral examinations for work evaluations and promotions.

During the Han Dynasty, test batteries covered subjects like civil law, military affairs, and agriculture. By the Ming Dynasty, a multistage testing system was established, with participants advancing through local, regional, and national levels to compete for public office based on exam scores.

  • The Western world adopted testing programs from China.
  • British influence led to testing in the English East India Company in 1832, then for the British civil service in 1855.
  • France, Germany, and the U.S. followed suit.
  • The U.S. created the American Civil Service Commission in 1883 to conduct competitive exams for government positions, expanding the testing movement in the West.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Describe the basic concept of psychological and educational testing and Darwins contribution…

A

Charles Darwin and Individual Differences

The basic concept of psychological and educational testing focuses on individual differences. Tests are tailored to measure:
- variations in ability and
- personality among individuals, recognizing that no two people are alike.

Developing tools to measure individual differences was challenging until Charles Darwin’s theory on evolution highlighted how variations among species contribute to survival.

Darwin proposed that those with adaptive traits survive and pass them on, leading to the complexity and intelligence seen in life today.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Describe Francis Galton & James Cattells contributions…

A

Sir Francis Galton, influenced by Darwin, applied evolutionary theories to human studies.

He aimed to prove that some individuals were more fit due to genetic traits, conducting studies on:
- human sensory and
- motor differences.

This research laid the foundation for the study of human individual differences in psychology.

Galton’s work was extended by the U.S. psychologist ——- James McKeen Cattell, who coined the term mental test (Cattell, 1890).

Cattell’s doctoral dissertation was based on Galton’s work on individual differences in reaction time.

As such, Cattell perpetuated and stimulated the forces that ultimately led to the development of modern tests.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Describe the history of Experimental Psychology and Psychophysical Measurement

A

Experimental Psychology and Psychophysical Measurement

The foundation of testing in experimental psychology traces back to early efforts to understand human consciousness.

J.E. Herbart developed mathematical models of the mind, influencing 19th-century educational theories.

E.H. Weber explored sensory thresholds, while G.T. Fechner formulated the law linking sensation strength to stimulus intensity logarithmically.

  • Wilhelm Wundt founded psychology at the University of Leipzig in 1879,
  • succeeded by E. B. Titchner and influential figures like G. Whipple and L. L. Thurstone.

Whipple’s seminar in 1919 led to the development of the

  • Carnegie Interest Inventory and the
  • Strong Vocational Interest Blank, impacting the field of testing.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Describe the relationship between the development of psychological testing and experimental psychology

A

Psychological testing originated from Darwin, Galton, and Cattell’s focus on individual differences, and German psychophysicists’ work like Herbart, Weber, Fechner, and Wundt.

Experimental psychology stemmed from the latter group. The concept of;

  • rigorous experimental control in testing parallels experiments,
  • emphasizing standardized test administration conditions.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Where does the need for the creation of modern psychological tests stem from? Describe

A

The creation of modern psychological tests stemmed from the need to classify and identify the mentally and emotionally handicapped.

Early tests like the:

  • Seguin Form Board Test and
  • Kraepelin’s examinations

were developed for evaluating such individuals.

At the turn of the 20th century, a French commission, including Alfred Binet, developed the first major general intelligence test to identify intellectually subnormal individuals

…..for tailored education……

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Describe the evolution of Intelligence and Standardized Achievement Tests

A

The Evolution of Intelligence and Standardized Achievement Tests

The Binet-Simon Scale, published in 1905, aimed to:

(((((identify intellectually subnormal individuals using 30 increasingly difficult items. )))))

Standardization through a sample of 50 children allowed for comparison of test results.
Norms from the sample aided in evaluating scores accurately.

= Obtaining a standardization sample that represents the test’s target population is crucial. =

(+ / -) Comparing individuals to groups with different characteristics is inappropriate as it can lead to unfair evaluations.

Binet recognized the significance of a standardization sample for test development.

Enhancements to the Binet test included efforts to expand and ensure the sample’s representativeness. A representative sample mirrors the intended test users and should encompass all population segments in proportion to their prevalence when used for the general population.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe improvements to the Binet-Simon Scale and the impact of this…

A

In 1908, the Binet-Simon Scale was enhanced with more items and a larger standardization sample. It introduced the concept of:
- mental age,
- measuring a child’s performance relative to their age group. T

This concept compared a child’s abilities to those of an average child in a specific age group, regardless of their actual age.

In 1911, the Binet-Simon Scale was revised and popularized globally for intelligence testing.

In the United States, L. M. Terman developed the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale in 1916, representing an advancement in testing standards.

Terman’s 1916 revision of the Binet-Simon Scale improved by

  • INCREASING the standardization sample to 1,000 people,
  • revising original items, and
  • adding new ones.

The Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale boosted the credibility of the emerging testing movement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe the impact of WW1

A

World War I

The testing movement expanded in the U.S. during World War I to assess military recruits efficiently.

Large-scale group testing was needed due to limited personnel, despite the Binet test being an individual assessment.

Shortly AFTER the US entered World War I, Robert Yerkes, President of the American Psychological Association, led a committee to create two tests:

  • Army Alpha for reading ability and
  • Army Beta for assessing intelligence in illiterate adults.

World War I led to the development of;

  • group tests,
  • expanding testing to achievement, aptitude, interest, and personality.

The distinctions between achievement, aptitude, and intelligence tests were blurred.

The 1916 Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale and Army Alpha test sparked optimism in measuring
HUMAN BEHAVIOUR.

Schools, colleges, and industry adopted tests following the war, viewing psychological tests as a solution to challenges posed by population and technological growth.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q
A

Achievement Tests

Standardized achievement tests, a key post-World War I development, offer multiple-choice questions standardized on a large sample to establish norms for comparing new examinees’ results.

Standardized achievement tests gained popularity due to ease of administration, objective scoring, and cost efficiency compared to essays. They provided consistent testing conditions and broader content coverage for a large number of students. The Stanford Achievement Test, published in 1923, marked a milestone in standardized testing development.

Standardized tests gained popularity in the 1930s for their objectivity. Today, there is a shift towards favoring written tests and portfolios over standardized tests to assess children and reduce marginalization.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q
A

Rising to the Challenge
Critics in the 1930s US testing movement challenged existing tests, including the Stanford-Binet, despite the development of new tests. Accuracy and utility were heavily criticized, causing advocates to become defensive.

In the late 1930s, tests like the Stanford-Binet were improved with greater standardization. In 1939, David Wechsler introduced the Wechsler-Bellevue Intelligence Scale, offering multiple scores for a more comprehensive analysis of abilities compared to the single IQ score from the Stanford-Binet test.

The Wechsler test includes a performance IQ score that assesses intelligence without verbal responses, benefiting individuals with limited language skills. Wechsler’s nonverbal scale addressed weaknesses of the Stanford-Binet test, criticized for its focus on verbal skills. The Binet test was revised in 1986 and 2003 to include performance subtests. Chapter 10 will define important concepts in intelligence testing, including the Wechsler intelligence scales.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q
A

Personality Tests: 1920–1940

Personality tests emerged pre and post World War II, focusing on stable traits that influence behavior. Traits are enduring tendencies like optimism or pessimism. Traditional tests aim to measure these traits, but they have limitations.

The first structured personality tests were paper-and-pencil group tests with multiple-choice and true-false questions, providing a high level of structure for scoring. The Woodworth Personal Data Sheet, developed during World War I, was the earliest example of a structured personality test.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q
A

Details
The Woodworth Personal Data Sheet represented an attempt to standardize the psychiatric interview. It contains questions such as those shown here.

The first personality tests, like the Binet and Woodworth tests, were developed for screening military recruits. Early tests had simplistic structures and flawed assumptions, such as interpreting responses at face value. The interpretation of statements like “I wet the bed” led to unreliable results due to differing interpretations and dishonest responses.

The Woodworth test led to structured personality tests assuming subjects’ responses at face value. Early tests faced criticism and nearly disappeared, but modern concepts revived them post-World War II.

Interest in projective personality tests grew during the rise and fall of structured tests. Unlike structured tests, projective tests use ambiguous stimuli and subjective scoring methods.

Interest in the Rorschach inkblot test grew slowly after its publication in 1921 by Herman Rorschach. David Levy introduced it to the U.S., and Sam Beck’s 1932 dissertation boosted its scientific investigation. Despite early skepticism, the test gained popularity until facing scrutiny today.

The Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) developed in 1935 by Henry Murray and Christina Morgan added momentum to projective test acceptance. Unlike the Rorschach test, the TAT used structured ambiguous pictures for subjects to create stories about, aiming to measure human needs and individual motivation differences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q
A

The Emergence of New Approaches to Personality Testing
The Rorschach and TAT projective personality tests gained popularity in the late 1930s and early 1940s, but their psychometric properties, especially the Rorschach, have been questioned in later examinations.

The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), introduced in 1943, transformed structured personality tests by emphasizing empirical research to determine test response meanings. Unlike earlier tests, the MMPI required empirical data for interpretation, leading to its widespread use and influencing the development of numerous studies.

Personality tests emerged with the MMPI and factor analysis, a statistical method to identify underlying dimensions. For example, traits like outgoing and talkative may be grouped under extroversion through factor analysis.

In the early 1940s, Guilford and Cattell pioneered structured personality tests using factor analysis. Cattell introduced the Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF), a well-constructed test. Factor analysis is now widely used in test design and validation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q
A

Summary of Personality Tests
Woodworth Personal Data Sheet: An early structured personality test that assumed that a test response can be taken at face value.

The Rorschach Inkblot Test: A highly controversial projective test that provided an ambiguous stimulus (an inkblot) and asked the subject what it might be.

The Thematic Apperception Test (TAT): A projective test that provided ambiguous pictures and asked subjects to make up a story.

The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI): A structured personality test that made no assumptions about the meaning of a test response. Such meaning was to be determined by empirical research.

The California Psychological Inventory (CPI): A structured personality test developed according to the same principles as the MMPI.

The Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF): A structured personality test based on the statistical procedure of factor analysis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q
A

The Period of Rapid Changes in the Status of Testing

In the 1940s, applied psychology saw growth with the development of psychological testing technology. Tests from World War I were important in World War II, leading to federal funding for psychologist training. This support led to the formalization of clinical psychology by 1949, with other branches like industrial and counseling psychology also expanding.

During the late 1940s and early 1950s, clinical psychologists primarily focused on psychological testing, as highlighted in reports and standards by various organizations. While psychologists conducted testing independently, they collaborated with physicians for psychotherapy. This complementary role aided medical practitioners, establishing psychologists as testers in the field of clinical psychology.

The government successfully stimulated the development of applied psychology, attracting talented individuals to fields like clinical psychology. These practitioners were uniquely trained to apply psychological principles and techniques to solve practical human issues.

Early clinical psychologists felt limited in their role compared to physicians, leading to a rejection of psychotherapy and testing in the mid-20th century. Public suspicion and professional criticism caused a decline in the status of testing until the 1970s.

17
Q
A

The Period of Rapid Changes in the Status of Testing
In the 1940s, applied psychology advanced due to the development of psychological testing technology, influenced by tests from World War I. Federal funding for psychologist training during World War II contributed to the formalization of clinical psychology in 1949, with industrial and counseling psychology also growing.

Clinical psychologists in the late 1940s and early 1950s primarily focused on psychological testing, collaborating with physicians for psychotherapy. This complementary role established psychologists as testers in clinical psychology.

The government’s support boosted applied psychology, drawing skilled professionals to areas like clinical psychology for practical problem-solving using psychological methods.

Early clinical psychologists felt constrained compared to physicians, causing a decline in the status of psychotherapy and testing until the 1970s due to public suspicion and professional criticism.

18
Q
A

Chapter 19. Test Bias

Serious emotional debates over the meaning of tests for placing and classifying individuals have sparked for 60 years. The chapter explores test bias, which has led to court evaluations of test significance for racial and ethnic minorities.

Test bias is a significant concern in mental testing, but controversies have existed since the inception of test reports in 1905. Psychologists have debated these issues since the 1920s, as indicated by various researchers (Ajayi, 2016; Cottrell, Newman, & Roisman, 2015; Reynolds & Livingston, 2012; Cronbach, 1975; Haney, 1981; Mukherjee, 2016).

Educational attainment predicts various aspects of life. Inequality is a significant social issue. Some believe educational differences reflect intelligence, a controversial topic. Scholars have discussed this over 60 years, aiming to present various viewpoints without taking a stance on their validity.

19
Q
A

Why Is Test Bias Controversial?
The cornerstone of U.S. political and social thought is equality, but not all individuals are treated equally. Psychological tests measure differences in personal characteristics like intelligence, potentially challenging the notion of equal basic abilities among people.

Some ethnic groups score lower on certain psychological tests, like intelligence tests where African Americans average 15 points lower than white Americans. Despite significant overlap in distributions, Asian Americans tend to score highest on tests, followed by white and African American students.

The finding of IQ score differences between African Americans and white Americans has been consistent in studies. The debate on the cause of these differences includes environmental and biological factors. The discussion extends to the inherent problems in IQ tests, beyond genetics and environmental influences.

There have been slow improvements in achievement tests, with math and reading scores for African American and white students improving since the 1990s. Disparities persist but are narrowing over time. The achievement gap reflects unequal access to quality education and insufficient funding for schools serving low-income students.

20
Q
A

An increasing number of people are not reporting their race when asked, impacting studies like the College Board’s SAT score report. The report indicated stable scores but persistent gaps between different ethnic groups. Some students not disclosing their ethnicity may affect performance evaluation. Reasons for non-disclosure vary, including concerns about stereotype threat for African American students, perceived discrimination by white students, and tension related to reporting multiple racial identities.

21
Q
A

Professional Issues

Three major professional issues continually play an especially important role in the current status and the future of psychological testing: theoretical concerns, the adequacy of tests, and actuarial versus clinical prediction (see Figure 21.1).

22
Q
A

Theoretical Concerns
Reliability of test results is crucial for validity. Unreliable tests lack meaning, so stability is essential for tests to be considered meaningful in current practice.

Each test must possess the type of reliability that is appropriate to the test’s uses.

Most psychological tests focus on measuring stable individual characteristics or current functioning. Psychologists describe individuals as if independent of their environment, using labels like “emotionally unstable” or “schizophrenic.” Tests aim to measure enduring qualities that persist over time regardless of external factors.

23
Q
A

Testers assume test variance comes from the individual, not external factors. Imperfections in measuring stable characteristics are attributed to test-related issues or subject variables. The stability of results reflects the accuracy of the test in measuring the stable characteristic.

The stability of personality traits over time is questioned in psychology. Early views saw personality as fixed, while others believe it can change and be influenced by external factors and situations.

The text questions the assumption that human characteristics can be measured independently of their context. It suggests that psychological tests are limited by the underlying psychology science. Testing should align with scientific knowledge, considering the stability of human characteristics in different environments. The idea of measuring behavior within social contexts using virtual reality technology is proposed for improved testing methodologies.

People exhibit stability but also change over time, impacting the reliability of personality tests. Intelligence involves adaptability to circumstances, reflecting the constant changes individuals undergo.

24
Q
A

The Adequacy of Tests
The book focuses on evaluating tests using psychometric standards rather than external criteria. David Shakow highlighted the ongoing challenge of providing objective and sound psychological assessments after a long career in clinical psychology. His insights remain relevant today, emphasizing the need for continuous improvement in testing practices.

The use of tests is crucial, with accuracy and fairness being key considerations. Tests leading to selection biases raise concerns, especially if they impact diversity. Legal entities like the U.S. Supreme Court may ultimately determine the justification of test usage.

25
Q
A

Actuarial Versus Clinical Prediction

The text discusses the lack of feedback on the accuracy of predictions made by test users, questioning if tests truly improve assessment or if practitioners are repeating errors without learning from them.

The research delves into the debate of actuarial versus clinical prediction in psychology. Studies show actuarial rules often outperform trained practitioners in predicting outcomes. The rise of computerized test interpretations has reignited this debate, with concerns about the accuracy and potential abuses of relying solely on computer algorithms for diagnostic purposes.

The responsibility for diagnostic analysis lies with clinicians, as per APA guidelines. Despite available technology, a 2011 survey showed few independent practitioners used technology in their practices and were unsure about its ethical use. There is a suggestion for Ph.D. programs to include computer training for doctoral students to keep up with technological advancements.