2. Firearms and Taser Flashcards
Must know - Section 40 of the Arms Act 1983 - What must every person in possession of a firearm, air gun, pistol or restricted weapon do when asked by a police member in uniform or who produces evidence of being a member of police.
on demand, give his full name, address, and date of birth
(2) If any person refuses to give his name, address, or date of birth or gives false particulars thereof, any member of the Police –
(a) May caution that person; and
(b) If that person persists in such refusal or fails or continues to fail to give the correct particulars, –
may arrest him without warrant.
Must know -Section 40 of the Arms Act 1983. What must I do if they refuse to give details
May caution that person; and If that person persists in such refusal or fails or continues to fail to give the correct particulars, –may arrest him without warrant.
Must know - Section 40 of the Arms Act 1983. What is the penalty
for a term not exceeding 3 months imprisonment and/or $1,000
Must know -Section 66 of the Arms Act 1983. This section relates to the the driver or a vehicle or occupier . What weapons does this relate to?
firearm, airgun, pistol, imitation firearm, restricted weapon, or explosive
Must know -Section 66 of the Arms Act 1983. What is the gist of the section?
occupation of any land or building or the driver of any vehicle is deemed to be in possession of that firearm airgun, pistol, imitation firearm, restricted weapon, or explosive
Must know -Section 66 of the Arms Act 1983- What is the exception to this
proves that it was not his property and that it was in the possession of some other person
Must know -Section 66 of the Arms Act 1983- Caselaw. On what ground were the convictions quashed for unlawful possession of a firearm on premises owned by the defendant
The District Court misdirected the jury on the meaning of possession which resulted in potentially an unsafe verdict; with regard to firearms and explosive. Convictions quashed.
Note: this case serves to show how s66 operates as a ‘deeming’ provision; whereby an alleged offender can be ‘deemed’ to be in possession of arms/ammunition if proven that the alleged offender was in occupation of the relevant property. A presumption of such possession can be rebutted by the defence proving, on the balance of probabilities, that the arms/ammunition was in the possession of someone else, NOT the alleged offender(s).
Must know -What are the five requirements for police to carry a firearm?
when their perceived cumulative assessment of a situation is that it is in, or likely to escalate to be within, the death/grievous bodily harm range as specified by the Tactical Options Framework in the
AOS/STG/Protection services
Escorts for valuables
to destroy animals in circumstances set out in the Animals chapter
for training purposes.
Who can be deployed with firearms
Only level one responders
Who must officers advise of their decision to carry firearms.
their immediate supervisor and the Police Communications Centre
When must I wear HAP
Every time when deploying to an incident where firearms could be present.
Must Know - Under F61 describe the the four proposes firearms can be used.
Defending themselves or another - Section 48, Crimes Act 1961
Arresting an offender- Section 39 Crimes Act 1961
Prevent escape Section 40 Crimes Act 1961
Destroying animals
Must Know - Under F61. With each of these sections what must you believe?
believe on reasonable grounds that the offender poses a threat of death or grievous bodily harm and the action cannot be done in a less violent manner.
Must Know- When are the three times a firearm can be used?
Training, animal destruction and as a tactical option.
Must Know- Under F61. What are three things you must consider before shooting?
Communication,
Less violent alternatives (Proportionality)
Delay (Necessity)
they must have first been asked to surrender (unless it is impractical or unsafe to do so), and
it must be clear they cannot be disarmed or arrested without first being shot, and
it must be clear that further delay in apprehending the offender would be dangerous or impractical