Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

AWM > 2 - FINANCIAL PLANNING (fin) > Flashcards

2 - FINANCIAL PLANNING (fin) Flashcards

1
Q

What is financial planning

A
  • professional service for people who need objective assistance in org financial affairs to achieve financial and lifestyle goals
  • covers areas including CF managements, retirement planning, investment/tax/estate planning - goal is to optimise allocation of financial resource to meet short and LT needs
  • evolving plan of action
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Financial + IM planning process

A
  • collate all relevant info + consider vulnerability
  • asses level of risk client is willing to undertake and understanding of risk
  • determine feasibility or risk and return expectations + goals
  • determine client ability to withstand loss/capacity for loss/level of comfort
  • consider ethical/resp/sustainable views
  • establish macro backdrop, risk + liqudiity
  • other considerations
  • review range of solutions and which most suitable
  • direct or indirect strategy
  • construct portfolio based on investment strat
  • present recs to client with docs and risk warnings and how you came to solution
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Client info to obtain in step on of planning process

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Phases of FP Process

A
  1. Establishing client relationship
    - identify needs of client + determine if firm is able to meet, if advisor has necessary competencies/skills
    - explain services firm offers and outlines processes/reg disclosures
    - determine if advice from other experts needs (Tax, lawyers etc)
    - gaining/earning trust of client and devleop rapport, good listener
  2. Collect client info
    - advisor identifies client personal info, financial needs/objectives + priorities so they can analyse financial position and find suitable solutions
    - clearly explain reason for collection is so firm can act in clients best interests
    - Agreeing investment/financial objectives and any constraints
    - Establishing risk profile
    - Collecting quant and quali data needed
    - KYC info
    - risk profiling (ability, attitude, tolerance)
    - liquidity reqs, time horizons, tax status, investment pref
  3. Analyse client financial status
    - assets and liabilities, commitments, inheritance, pensions, income etc
    - net assets, CF statement, tax analysis and lifetime CF statements
  4. Dev client solutions
    - investment objectives and constraints taking into account ability and willingness to take risk
    - ESG/responsible preferences
    - ensure recommendations are affordable and if no suitable prod is available then no rec should be made
  5. Implement
  6. Review
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Trust in client relationships

A

Trust in technical competence
- experience and knowledge, help to make hard financial decisions
- explains clearly without jargon or oversimplifying

Trust in ethical conduct and character
- personal ethic of advisor and rep of firm

Trust in empathetic skills and maturity
- interpersonal relationships - death, discretion, empathy, tact, comfort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Client cats - elective professional client assessment

A

establish appropriate category @ outset and keep under review
Retail clients can request recategorization if they meet quali/quant reqs

  • must be specified which prods/servs client wishes to be catergorised for

Quali test
- sufficient experience and understanding? assess expertise and knowledge, capable of understanding risks?
- client trading history, financial standing

Quant test (at least 2)
- has carried out trans in significant size on relevant market at avg freq of 10/q over last 4q
- financial instrument portfolio >500k euro
- has worked in financial sector for >1y in profesh position that reqs knowledge of transactions envisaged

Client must
- state in writing they want to be treated as proesh
- firm must state in writing the warnings of protections they lose
- client must state in writing separately they are happy with losses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Consequences of opting up to profesh categorisation

A

Comms
- may be more complex/detailed on trades etc
- info about firm itself may be less specific and less frequent

Suitability/Appropriateness
- firm assumes client has necessary level of experience and knowledge to understand risks when assessing suitability for professional client
(in relation to prods/servs they have been opted up for)

Dealing
- dealing location less restricted (must be RIE, MTF or systematic internaliser for retain)
- for XO trades, trimeframe is more rigorous for providing confirmation for retail clients

Funds
- unregulated CISs are deemed too risky and not suitable for retail investors but can be promoted to professional

Reporting
- For retail clients: have to inform client when value of leveraged instruments depreciate by >10% (and every 10% after) but dont have to do for profesh

Client assets
- client money rules more prescriptive for retail clients
- firms can transfer ownership of assets from client to firm as collateral to cover future or current obligations for professional clients but not retail

Retail clients cannot opt up another step to EC - but other profession clients can opt up to EC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Mifid client catergories

A
  1. Retail Clients
    Definition: Everyday individuals or less experienced investors.
    Protection: Highest level of protection.
    Regulations: Firms must ensure best execution, appropriateness tests, and extensive disclosures.
    Risk Awareness: Clients considered less experienced with financial products
  2. Professional Clients
    Definition: Institutional investors, large corporations, or individuals with significant financial knowledge.
    Protection: Moderate level of protection.
    Regulations: Some obligations like best execution apply; fewer disclosures required.
    Risk Awareness: Clients are assumed to understand the risks of complex financial instruments.
  3. Eligible Counterparties (ECPs)
    Definition: Financial institutions, governments, large corporations, or supranational organizations.
    Protection: Lowest level of protection.
    Regulations: No best execution or appropriateness requirements; minimal disclosure needed.
    Risk Awareness: Considered the most sophisticated clients, able to assess risks on their own.

Note: Clients can request to be “opted up” or “opted down” for higher or lower protection levels, depending on their experience and knowledge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Independent vs restricted advice

A

Independent advice
- advisor is able to recommend product from the entire market and must consider all relevant options
- not biased or influenced by affiliations or llimitations
- duty to recommend best prod regardless of provider

Restricted
- advice provided that only offers prods from certain providers or limited range of products
- must disclose nature of restriction to client (where it is restricted, if product restrictions are entities with close links to firm)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

FCA good practise ML checks

A
  • use of electronic verification and PEP databases (understanding limitations)
  • cater for customers who lack common forms of ID
  • understands complex or opaque corporate structures
  • source of weatlh = how customer/beneficial owner acquired total wealth
  • source of funds = refers to origin of specific funds involved in bis relationship (salary, sale proceeds etc)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Responsibilities of fiduciary relationship between advisor and client

A
  • act in utmost good faith
  • not profit from trust placed in you
  • not put in position where own interests conflict those of a client
  • dont misuse confidential info for own advantage or for advantage of 3rd party
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

BF

A

Traditional finance theory suggests investors = rational decision makers in light of risk and return ops
In practise - emotion/psychology etc influence our decision making and cause us to act in irrational ways
BF looks at how psych influences investors and financial markets, focusing on how cognitive biases, emotions, and social factors affect financial decisions, often leading to irrational behaviour and market inefficiencies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Heuristics

A

Mental shortcuts people use to make decisions in complex or uncertain environments

Bounded rationality = people seek to make decision that is good enough vs the best possible/most optimal decision

Reliance on heuristics increases when stressed (short on time/emotional/complex)

To prevent over reliance
- PM could limit to no. of portfolio options presented to client/ensure high qual and properly differentiated (to avoid choice overload)
- explain herd behaviour using precious asset bubbles
- take account of way info is presented to clients

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

BF: Use of information

A
  • Indivs may not take into account all the relevant info
  • Helps explain why investors rely on past perf and fail to take full account of risk/return characteristics
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Investment inertia

A

Tendency of indivs to maintain current course of action - even when faced with new info/changes in environment that suggest changes should be made
- e.g. not changing portfolio AA

Tendency to stick with default option
- e.g. default pension fund

Causes:
Status Quo Bias: A preference for maintaining current decisions to avoid potential regret or loss, especially in complex situs
Cognitive Effort: Avoidance of the mental effort required to reevaluate and change investment positions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Representativeness

A

Tendency to see patterns where they dont exist when having to make decisions under conditions of uncertainty w/ inadequate info
- tend to draw inferences without considering sample size + extrapolate beliefs from isolated occurrences (e.g. recession in covid vs 2024 = v diff causes)
- investors classify new information based on how closely it resembles existing stereotypes or patterns, rather than using statistical reasoning or objective analysis
-can lead to incorrect judgments about the likelihood or relevance of an event.

Key Issues:

assume similarity in one aspect will lead to similarity in others

e.g. making inv decisions on basis of value vs growth only vs detailed analysis of company’s distinct features

Can result in overreaction to short-term trends and poor decision-making based on faulty assumptions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Overconfidence

A

Tendency to have exaggerated views of own abilities/judgements
Can be linked to anchoring effect - especially when people asked to estimate range of possible values

  • can lead to investors overestimating predictive ability
  • constructing future forecasts that are too optimistic and UW prob of bad outcomes - can lead to more risk taking and overtrading
  • analysts slow to revise previous assessments even where there is evidence it is incorrect

-w/ clients - can be hard to establish true risk profile when there is overconfidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Anchoring

A

Tendency for indivs to fixate on arbitrary initial value/anchor as unconscious reference point when making decision
- then not being conscious of more info entering the market
- persists even when investor is aware that value is random
- not making decision based on fundamentals just considering purchase price relative to anchor value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Gambler’s fallacy

A

Failure to appreciate implications of randomness and probability
- belief that an event (whose occurrences are independent and identically distributed) has occurred more frequently than expected, it is less likely to happen again in the future

  • echoes widespread belief of mean reversion (there are observations that support mean reversion but no purely statistic reason why it should occur)
  • selling a security that has done well purely on the back of series of positive price movements (not it being expensive fundamentally)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Availability bias

A

Tendency to use info the comes to mind quickly/easily when making decisions

Tend to OW more readily avail info on bias that if came to mind quicker must be more relevant/important

Also OW info presented in format consistent with choice format (e.g. if decision is numerical then prefer info presented numerically)

Practical - manipulating info to more useful form

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Hindsight bias

A

Availability bias + representativeness = hindsight bias

Tendency for investors to find an event to have been predictable after the fact (despite little/no evidence that it would happen beforehand)

Links to overconfidence bias - can make investors overly confident in future decisions as they believe they can see into future

e.g. post GFC investors convinced themselves it was obvious returns were going to be disastrous despite 07 strategy forecasters predicting high levels of return

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Herd behaviour

A

Tendency for investors to follow eachother due to strong social preferences to conform
- bad decisions perceived as being less incorrect if everyone was wrong together
- can lead to indivs making decisions they wouldnt have ordinarily made
- can result in formation of asset bubbles = self fulfilling prophecy
- dot com bubble - investors eager to take part in trend w/out looking at fundamentals/val metrics. when investors realised comps had little/no revs and were essentially worthless started selling out bursting bubble - Nasdaq down 80% from 2000 peak by 2002

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Confirmation bias

A

Tendency for indivs to seek out info that confirms vs contradicts their existing position
- and interpret ambiguous info as supporting their viewpoint

-unhelpful filter of potentially good ideas if they dont conform to prior belief
- failing to see info that challenges belief system and can lead to poor/outdated investment decisions

24
Q

Mental accounting

A

Mental accounting refers to the different values a person places on the same amount of money, based on subjective criteria, often with detrimental results -
people frame assets as belong to different, non fungible catergories/accounts

often leads people to make irrational investment decisions and behave in financially counterproductive or detrimental ways, such as funding a low-interest savings account while carrying large credit card balances

e.g. spending discretionary bonus in a way you wouldnt spend regular income

mental accounting suggest marginal propensity to consume from each account is different

To avoid: the mental-accounting bias, individuals should treat money as completely interchangeable no matter where they allocate it—whether to a budget account (everyday living expenses), a discretionary spending account, or a wealth account (savings and investments).

25
Q

Bounded rationality

A

Bounded rationality is the idea that rationality is limited when individuals make decisions, and under these limitations, rational individuals will select a decision that is satisfactory rather than optimal.

26
Q

Present bias

A

Tendency to give stronger weight to payoffs that are closer to present time

Implies higher discount rate for now vs future

Tendency to discount future in favour of present

overvalue more immediate rewards or benefits at the expense of future rewards or benefit

can lead people to make irrational decisions that favor short-term gains - often @ expense of LT wellbeing

can take form of hyperbolic discounting = where investors discount value of future rewards far more steeply as they get closer to the present

27
Q

How to avoid present bias in investments

A

Debias people from retiring early and drawing from pension with messaging = pension pot growing at max rate
most people retire before state pension age but have not planned to retire early

Adopt LT investment strat that requires disciplined, consistent investment over time

28
Q

Prospect theory

A

PT says that losses and gains are valued differently - AKA as loss aversion theory

investors will make decision on perceived gains vs percieved losses (e.g. £50 vs 50% chance of £100 = same value but people will chose £50)

says that standard finance model of rational agents doesnt explain how most people undertake financial decision making

behaviours of investors are outcomes of prospect theory = psychologically more accurate description of decision making in risk based setting

prospect theory investors sell winners too early but do not like to sell shares that are at a loss relative to a reference point

29
Q

Regret aversion

A

Desire to avoid feeling pain from poor investment decision
- including pain of responsibility for making decision (not just financial pain)
- both for client and advisor, automatic rebalancing can help

Encourages holding on to poorly performing shares to avoid crystallizing loss and acknowledging poor decision has been made

Biases new decisions = avoiding investments that have performed poorly in the past

Investors prefer strong consensus judgements (wrong together>wrong alone) - may enforce herd behaviour/FOMO/decision making with ref to peergroup

30
Q

Loss aversion + reasons for

A

Most important driver in human decision making

Investors dont experience losses and gains with the same intensity
- higher degree of emotional intensity with losses vs gain

leads to premature realization of gains and loss avoidance on the downside
advisors must help clients avoid this, explain future prospects of investments

Lack of financial capacity to bear loss
- low no. of remaining working years (worse if retirement is cap intensive)
- specific near term financial commitment

Lack of capacity to understand investment losses
- not understanding cap at risk and LT outcome may be unaffected
- more to do with psych than knowledge and may be hard to train out of people

Phych reluctance/unwillingness to bear loss
- some people naturally v risk averse despite having capacity to bear loss

31
Q

Mental accounting

A

Mental accounting refers to the different values a person places on the same amount of money, based on subjective criteria, often with detrimental results -
people frame assets as belong to different, non fungible catergories/accounts

often leads people to make irrational investment decisions and behave in financially counterproductive or detrimental ways, such as funding a low-interest savings account while carrying large credit card balances

e.g. spending discretionary bonus in a way you wouldnt spend regular income

mental accounting suggest marginal propensity to consume from each account is different

To avoid: the mental-accounting bias, individuals should treat money as completely interchangeable no matter where they allocate it—whether to a budget account (everyday living expenses), a discretionary spending account, or a wealth account (savings and investments).

32
Q

Info/noise traders

A

Info trader
According to MPT - this is how to adopt success = become info trader
High qual info = key to profitable investment strategy
suggest people who trade on info are correct in rationally expecting to make profit -
opposite to noise trader

Noise trader
Opposite of info trader
Make trading decision without use of fundamental data - relies on trend/sentiment/anomalies/momentum

33
Q

KYC information

A
  • personal details (name, address, dob, tax residency, domicile, product eligibility)
  • health (can influence risk taking, vulnerability, life expectancy, income production? annuities, NT and LT goals)
  • family and dependents (names, ages etc, their attitude to risk and influence, school fees etc)
  • occupation, earnings, income, sources of wealth, future changes (knowledge/experience, conflicts, PEP - blind trust)
  • estimates of present and anticipated outgoings (future house purchases, budgeting, children etc, emergency funds- 6m)
  • assets and liabilities (location of assets, tax treatment and wrappers, CGT acquisition costs, early encashment penalties)
  • pension arrangements/life assurance (protections, managed in conjunction?, contributions elsewhere)
  • potential inheritances and estate planning arrangements (any trusts they are beneficiaries of, future big lump sums, specific gifts of shares in wills)
34
Q

Risk profile

A
  • assessed qualitatively and quantitively
  • not exact science - risk profiling tool may have numeric output but risk not linear
  • client may also have misunderstood questionnaire
  • helps to make risk feel risk with max drawdrown etc
  • 3 main areas + need

Risk tolerance
- the amount of loss an investor is prepared to handle while making an investment decision-
- can change throughout life or with different pots (e.g. 20yo SIPP vs 70 yo SIPP)

Attitude to risk/ risk perception
- can have different attitude with different pots of money (mental accounting)

Risk capacity
- financial capacity to withstand losses

Need to take risk
- in order to meet their financial goals

35
Q

Risk tolerance

A
  • the amount of loss an investor is prepared to handle while making an investment decision
  • degree of uncertainty an investor can handle
  • can change throughout life or with different pots (e.g. 20yo SIPP vs 70 yo SIPP)

Objective factors
- timescale
- family commitments
- overall family wealth
- stage of life/marriage
- age

Subjective factors
- knowledge and experience
- psychological makeup
-upbringing
- extent of regret aversion

36
Q

Risk perception/ATR

A
  • subjective view on risks of specific investments vs alternative based on knowledge and experience
  • intuition, inferences made from media etc
  • can have different attitude with different pots of money (mental accounting)
  • educate clients of factual risk/rewards of asset classes vs perception
  • can be influenced by cognitive biases and emotional state
37
Q

Risk capacity

A

Risk capacity
- financial capacity to withstand losses
- largely factual based on asset base, income, use of portfolio etc
- ability to bear loss can also depend on goals

38
Q

Risk profiling tools

A

Not an exact science but can be contribute to establishing a client’s ATR - often numeric score but risk not linear

Risk descriptions
- Quali approach, describe different attitudes to see which fits best with client’s. imple
- Easy to misinterpret ‘medium’ or 5/7

Psychometric risk profiling
- assess psychological risk tolerance/pref not objective financial capacity
- questionnaire generates risk score
- good starting point but not in isolation

Stochastic modelling
- software often includes risk profiling questionnaire to help categorise clients
- model can then forecast returns based on level of risk
- helps to make investment risk real but obvs reliant on assumptions, clients may think these are more certain than they are

39
Q

FCA risk profiling guidance

A
  • no prescriptions on how firms establish client risk, but requires robust procedures and risk cat descriptions + assessment of suitability of investments against these cats
  • procedures must includes - assessing capacity for loss, identifying where cash is more suitable due to extreme risk aversion
  • tools must be fit for purpose and limitations understood
  • questions must be fair, clear, not misleading
  • must ensure investments are suitable given objectives, financial situation and risk profile
  • must understand nature of products selected for customers
  • must engage customers in suitability assessment process which acts in best interests of customers
40
Q

Investment objectives

A

Maximising future growth
Protecting value of capital
Generating essential levels of income
Provision for future events (e.g. uni costs)
Protection pols for IHT

Simply

Income = higher level of income at expense of future capital growth
Income/growth balanced = certain amount of income but wants to achieve potential future growth of income and capital
Growth = not seeking specific income and primary objective is capital appreciation
Max growth = generally highest risk seeking max level of return

Tax treatment different so can affect goals

41
Q

Liquidity reqs

A
  • client may have known liabilities in the future, or may regularly take ad hoc income from portfolio - strat should account for vol in markets and have suitable readily releasable funds
  • Liquidity = funds a client may need in LT and ST
  • Plan on where (asset class and tax wrapper) to release capital from
  • Planning - amount of cash buffer that should be held + liquidity of UL assets in portfolio which can be released in emergency
  • bond ladders can be useful here
  • higher liquidity and shorter timescale generally means lower risk and restricts choice of assets
42
Q

Time horizon

A
  • generally = period over which client will be investing funds. LT = 10+, ST<4
  • important when selecting investments as more vol = less suitable for shorter time periods (equities >5y)
  • LT horizon allows you to endure periods of market vol
  • lifestyling of investments over life to reduce risk as retirement approaches and increase income (also do this for house purchaes etc)
43
Q

What to establish re tax status

A
  • v important re tax income/gains will be subject to and influences portfolio construction
  • e.g. HR taxpayer may bias towards capital growth due to lower tax rate applied and the fact CGT realisation can be timed
  • res and dom
  • income tax position and anticipated changes
  • attitude towards tax
  • any allowances
  • CGT losses/gains (losses carried forward)
  • eligibility for tax free accounts
    -marital status and inter spousal transfers
44
Q

Net assets statement - assessing client financial posi

A

Net assets statement
- personal balance sheets showings assets, liabilities and net worth
- asset allocation summary also useful to compare against client’s risk profile

Questions
- asre assets appropriate for client objective?
- why is there an overallocation to certain assets?
- how likely are targets to be met

45
Q

CF statement- assessing client financial posi

A
  • shows income and expenditure asset by asset (net)
  • quantifying income shortfall that needs to be generated by investments
  • identifying where there is surplus income and opps to put this to work if poss
  • current CF can be used to estimate future income/what would happen if client became ill/unable to work
46
Q

Tax analysis - assessing client financial posi

A
  • understanding of how client is taxed is essential + helps ascertain whether returns via income generation or capital growth are more efficient
  • ops for HR tax relief on pension contributions
  • tax relieved investments e.g. VCTs, EIS, SEIS
  • spreading assets between spouses to make use of PSA/divi allowances or NRB for IHT
  • spreading CGT disposals over years to make use of annual allowances
  • likelihood that client will be BR taxpayer in future (useful for bond rollup etc)
47
Q

FCA reqs on client personal info for financial recommendations

A
  • client can afford investment/product
  • client understands risks and how recs meet their needs
  • clients must be aware of importance of providing up to date info
  • advisor must undertake assessment of client knowledge/experience/risk tolerance including ability to bear loss
  • tools employed in suitability process must be appropriately designed and limitations known
  • taking steps to assure consistency of client info and questioning obvious inaccuracies
48
Q

Examples of unsuitable investment selection outcome

A

when firms

  • dont take account of all client’s objectives/situations and knowledge/exp
  • fail to challenge where auto generated investment selection is unsuitable for individual client
  • failure to ensure recs are consistent with risk description
  • reliance on vol solely as proxy for risk
  • not recognising importance of diversification
  • dont understand nature and risks of prods selected for clients
49
Q

Assumptions made in financial plan

A
  • assumed rates of return
  • future inflation rates
  • future expenditure patterns
  • rate of earnings increases
  • school and university fee increases
  • annuity and/or pension drawdown rates
  • future tax rates
  • life expectancy, and
  • future social security benefits.

Record on plan that these are assumptions and recs are based on these - show why they are reasonable and relevant to financial plan

50
Q

Assessing suitability of investment decision

A

Suitability assessment means the whole process of collecting information about a client, and the
subsequent assessment of the suitability of a given financial instrument for that client.

Suitability rules apply when firms make personal recs related to designated investments and when they manage investments

3 elements

1 - Knowledge and exp
- in investment field relating to specific investment or service
- to understand risks/transaction/management of portfolio
- should include real world examples e..g max drawdown to make risk feel real

  1. Financial situation
    - ability to bear investment risks consistent with objectives
  2. Investment objectives
    - preferences regarding risk taking, length of time to hold, risk profile and purpose of investment
    - holding period specifically important for illiquid instruments
51
Q

FCA guidance on assessing suitability

A

Firm must take reasonable steps to ensure rec/decision to trade is suitable for customer
- firms must therefore obtain sufficient customer info that is required to understand whether or nor a decision is suitable

does specific transaction/rec…
- meet the customer’s investment objectives
- is customer able to bear risks consistent with objectives
- does customer have necessary exp/knowledge to understand risks

failure to obtain relevant info can lead to rec/transaction being unsuitable

52
Q

Suitability report

A
  • most advisors present recs in form of a report
  • best practise is an outline of client circs and needs, summary of recs with detailed sections on risk profile, AA, investments and wrapper selection
  • may be needed on ongoing basis where firm provides PM services or firm has informed client it will carry out periodic assessment of suitability
  • updated statement must contain info on how investments meet objectives, pref and risk characteristics of client
53
Q

Content of a suitability report

A

Cover, contents, intro
Objectives - statement of priorities, areas of considerations
Assumptions - included in financial plan
Attitudes - risk profile, attitude to saving, morbidity, mortality etc
Assets + liabilities
Income and expenditure - identifying surplus/deficit
Recs - + how they meet client objectives, action plan, what next, who does what action
Reviews - info about purpose and importance, timescale, who initiates, importance of keeping informed

54
Q

What must advisor provide client with if they rec a product

A
  • client agreements
  • suitability reports
  • product information
  • key features documents
  • illustrations
  • key information document (KID)/key investor information document (KIID)
  • aggregated costs disclosure
  • copy of the fact find, and
  • terms and conditions.

+ any risk warnings

55
Q

Insistent clients

A
  • client to whom firm has given rec + client then decides do something v different from rec and for firm to facilitate this
  • can lead to poor outcomes
  • e.g. boom of DB transfers post increases in pension freedoms

FCA says firms should make it clear
- communicate clearly what their advice is and why they gave it
- what piece of advice is being acted against
- that any further advice given is subsequent to the specific action requested by the insistent client’.
- produce distinct suitability reports for advice acted against and any further advice
- be clear with the client about the risks of their chosen course of action

56
Q

FP review + factors

A

FP should be reviewed at least every 12m - regulatory requirement where there is ongoing advice

  • reviewing the previous advice in light of any changes changes to circs
  • changes to goals and the amounts targeted
  • reviewing and amending the assumptions
  • changes in market conditions
  • net worth and income and expenditure
  • asset allocation and client risk profiles (including rebalancing portfolios)
  • time horizons
  • suitability of products and product wrappers held and revisiting the risk appetite and capacity for
    loss of the client
  • reviewing ATR
  • summarising the charges of the product, underlying fund costs, transaction costs, and adviser
    charges applied on an annual basis.

if there are significant changes may need a whole new plan but if not can adapt current one

57
Q

Fees

A
  • both independent and restricted advice paid for by what’s known as ‘advisor charging’
  • can be hourly or flat fee or % AUM
  • client still must pay if they decide not to go ahead with plan due to costs sustained by advisor (normally agreed up front)
  • FCA suggests an increase in transactional advice > ongoing advice may be what’s best for clients broadly
  • investors can be broadly unaware of what they are paying for advice - research done by FCA found this

AWM (7 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions