2. Express Private Trusts Flashcards
What are the three certainties required for a valid express private trust?
Certainty of:
- Intention to create a trust
- Subject matter i.e. property
- Objects i.e. beneficiaries
When must a settlor’s intent to create a trust be expressly manifested?
When they own the property
However, whilst the intent must exist at the time the property is owned, what can arise later as evidence of this?
Subsequent conduct consistent with an earlier intent
When must the settlor intend the trust to take effect when they express their intent?
Immediately
Whilst the settlor must intend the trust to take effect immediately, what should this not be confused with which is actually allowed?
Where the subject matter of the trust is the settlor’s future interest
What is a precatory expression and what is the effect of this?
A settlor’s mere hope, wish, or suggestion that property be used in a certain way is not sufficient to show intent to create a trust, i.e. impose a binding obligation on a trustee
I’m giving you £10,000 in the hope you will use it for your child’s education vs I’m giving you £10,000 to use for your child’s education
Can intention to create a trust arise informally, or through conduct?
Yes
What quality of language will normally defeat intention to create a trust?
Where it is ambiguous
What happens when a trust fails for uncertainty of intention?
The property passes as a gift to the person who would be trustee
Whilst the subject matter must be clear, when may an apparently uncertain description be valid?
When it is capable of objective definition, e.g. a reasonable income
What factor determines whether a fractional share of property is valid?
Whether it is tangible or intangible.
Intangible, e.g. shares: Fractions, e.g. 50% or half are valid
Tangible: Not valid unless the fraction has been segregated for the trust, even if the property is identical, e.g. wine of the same type and vintage
Whilst a future interest can be held in a trust, what cannot be?
An interest not yet in legal existence, e.g. an expected interest in property
Even where property (subject matter) is sufficiently identified, what will render a trust void?
If the amount a beneficiary is to receive is not defined with sufficient clarity
What happens when a trust fails for uncertainty of subject matter?
Property reverts to settlor
When a collective term for a class of beneficiaries is used, what must it be capable of? What are some examples of valid and invalid collective terms and why?
It must be capable of objective determination.(is/is not)
Nieces, nephews, brothers, sisters are valid because these can be defined by reference to the settlor’s actual family.
Friends, acquaintances are not valid because these are a fluid groups, changing all the time and over time.
Where a collective term is used for a class of beneficiaries, what are the two types of test used and what determines which one is used?
- Complete List Test - used for fixed trusts
- Given Postulant (is/is not) Test - used for discretionary trusts
What does the complete list test require for a fixed trust to be valid where a collective term is used for a class of beneficiaries?
Trustee must be able to draw up a complete list of beneficiaries (ie. conceptual AND evidential certainty)
Under the complete list test, do all beneficiaries need to be existence at the time?
No, as long as they are ascertainable by the time their interest vests (eg. children not yet born)
What two certainties does the complete list test require?
- Conceptual certainty (i.e. niece, nephew vs. friend as discussed)
- Evidential certainty (there must be evidence of these parties)
Under the complete list test, will a fixed trust fail if a beneficiary is known to exist but cannot be traced?
No
What is required under the given postulant (is/is not) test for a discretionary trust?
Definition of class must be sufficiently clear to enable to the trustees to assess the potential range of beneficiaries and determine whether any given postulant (person) falls within the class
It is not necessary for the whole range of potential beneficiaries to be ascertainable.
Why will evidential uncertainty not cause a discretionary trust to fail?
Because a potential beneficiary who cannot prove they are within the class has no right to be considered by a trustee
Regarding objects, what will cause a discretionary trust to fail?
Where there are so many beneficiaries that the trust is administratively unworkable
What happens when a trust fails for uncertainty of objects?
A resulting trust in favour of the settlor or the settlor’s successors is presumed