2. Domestic Abuse Flashcards
governing legislation for domestic abuse
domestic abuse act 2021
the two types of order available
- non-molestation orders
- occupation orders
what is an occupation order?
excludes the other party from occupation of the home. can extend to excluding party from a specified area around the home
who is an ‘associated person’? s62
a) they are / have been married to each other, or they are / have been civil partners
b) cohabitants or former cohabitants
c) live or have lived in the same household (otherwise than by reason of being the other’s employee, tenant, lodger, or boarder)
d) they are relatives (immediate / close)
e) they have agreed to marry / enter into a civil partnership (whether or not the agreement has been terminated)
f) re a child, they are both parents or have parental responsibility
g) parties to the same family proceedings
what is a non-molestation order?
an order prohibiting the respondent from molesting the applicant / child. covers not only violence & threats of violence, but also pestering.
to whom can the courts grant a non-molestation order to?
- any associated person; or
- free standing application under FLA 1996
what must the courts have regard to when considering whether to grant a non-molestation order?
s42(5) to all circumstances, including the need to secure the health, safety and well-being of the applicant and any child.
how long does a non-molestation order last for?
s42(7) for a specified period or until further order.
can be made for an indefinite period
what are the potential outcomes of an occupation order?
- require respondent to permit the applicant to enter and remain in the home / part of the home
- regulate occupation of the home by either / both parties
- prohibit, suspend, or restrict the respondent’s exercise of their right to occupy the home
- require the respondent to leave the home
- exclude the respondent from defined area in which the home is situated
under s30 FLA, does the death of the respondent terminate right of occupation?
yes- unless there is a provision to the opposite effect
what factors may the court consider in granting an occupation order per s33(6)?
- respective housing needs and resources of the parties, any child
- respective financial resources of the parties
- likely effect of any order / decision by court not to make such an order on h&s or wellbeing of the parties and relevant child
- ## conduct of the parties in relation to each other and otherwise
what qualifies the s33(6) occupation order factors?
s33(7) the balance of harm test
what is the balance of harm test? s33(7)
if it appears to the court that the applicant / any child is likely to suffer significant harm attributable to the conduct of the responded inf an occupation order is not made, then the court shall make such an order
exceptions to the balance of harm test
- respondent / any child is likely to suffer significant harm if the order is made;
- the harm likely to be suffered by the respondent or child is as great/greater than harm attributable to the conduct of the respondent which is likely to be suffered by the applicant or child if the order is not made.
chalmers v johns
applicant must show they would suffer significant harm attributable to respondent’s conduct before the court applies the balance of harm test
what if significant harm is not shown before court applies the test?
case determined on the basis of the s33(6) factors alone
BvB (Occupation Order)
- wife moved out of family home with daughter due to husband’s violence.
- wife rehoused by LA
- husband remained in the family home with son from a prev relationship
- BH test -> wife refused the OO
- son would suffer greater harm, as the husband would not be entitled to being rehoused.
- son would also need to change schools
does violence have to have taken place for an OO to be granted?
grubb v grubb -no.
- husband was verbally abusive and domineering. both parties suffered from stress
- husband was in a position to arrange alternative accommodation for himself easily
– OO made for 3 months
Dolan v Corby
- courts upheld OO against C who had been verbally abusive
Re L (children)
- no physical violence
- children were suffering significant harm caused by arguments- not attributable solely to husband
- BH test not made out
- court made an occupation order after applying 33(6)
how long does an OO last for?
may be for a specified period until the occurrence of a specified event (e.g conclusion of financial remedy proceedings following divorce) or until further order; or
can be for an indefinite period
what if applicant has no existing right to occupy, and respondent has such a right?
- applicant must be former spouse or former civil partner.
- home must be, or have been intended to be the family home
to whom does s33 apply to ?
Applicant has an existing right to occupy the home by virtue of beneficial estate, interest, contract or statutory entitlement.
home intended to be home of the applicant
to whom does s35 apply to ?
a former spouse or former civil partner who has no existing to occupy the home, and respondent has such a right