2 - Divisions of Power in EU Law Flashcards
What is a fundamental premise when talking about the division of power within EU? (2)
Distinction btwn:
1/ division of powers (exists, but not a pcple in itself)
2/ separation of powers (no consensus on whether it exists within EU)
What is DP in the EU? (2)
1/ multi-layered
2/ polycentric
Main idea of DP? (2)
1/ legal limits to power
2/ no abuse of power
What does DP protect? (3)
1/ freedom
2/ self-determination
3/ both of EU citizens and MS
What should one look at when studying the vertical DP within EU?
EU systems of competences
What are the constitutional pcples regarding the EU system of competences? (3)
See Art. 5 TEU
1/ pcple of conferral
2/ pcple of subsidiarity
3/ pcple of proportionality
Characteristics of the pcple of conferral? (4)
1/ conferred but limited powers
2/ renders EU a unique supranational polity (only derived powers)
3/ key to EU action is conferral (i.e. attribution)
4/ figures across the Treaties
Where can one find the distribution of competences?
Arts. 2-6 TFEU
What are the 4 types of competences?
1/ exclusive powers EU (Art. 3 TFEU)
2/ shared powers EU-MS (Art. 4 TFEU)
3/ complementary EU powers (Art. 6 TFEU)
4/ special competences
What are some competences considered ‘special’? (4)
1/ CFSP
2/ Art. 3(2) TFEU (subsequent exclusive treaty powers)
3/ coordination of economic, employment and social policies
4/ Art. 352 TFEU (‘flexibility clause’)
Characteristic exclusive powers EU?
MS may not act
Characteristics of shared powers EU-MS? (2)
1/ MS may act if EU didn’t act
2/ full or partial harmonisation
Characteristics of complementary powers? (2)
1/ MS act, but EU may coordinate, support or supplement
2/ e.g. Open Method of Coordination
Important characteristic of the pcple of conferral?
Its flexibility
Why can the pcple of conferral be considered ‘flexible’? (3)
1/ CJEU monopoly & teleological interpretation of Treaties
2/ horizontal cross-cutting ‘purposive’ competences within the Treaties (e.g. internal market, ‘flexibility clause’)
3/ MS bound to exercise their competences in conformity of EU law (even their exclusive competences)
What is striking about ‘Tobacco Advertising’ case?
First time ECJ didn’t accept the EU legislature’s interpretation of EU competence
2 cases in which ECJ reminded MS that they are bound to exercise their competences in conformity of EU law?
1/ Rottman (nationality case law)
2/ Viking and Laval (free movement law)
Characteristics of the ‘flexibility clause’ (Art. 352 TFEU)? (3)
1/ no EU power
2/ however, EU action is possible where it is necessary to attain one of the objectives of the Treaties
3/ there are limits
Limits to the ‘flexibility clause’? (3)
1/ no circumvention of harmonisation bans
2/ Council acts by unanimity
3/ may not result in amendement of the Treaty
Counter-mouvements to the flexibility of the pcple of conferral? (4)
1/ constitutional saving clauses (e.g. social policy, health, constitutional identity)
2/ Tobacco Advertising: ‘harmonising measures adopted on the basis of other provisions of the Treaty’
3/ harmonisation bans allow for use of Art. 114 TFEU if its conditions are fulfilled
4/ ultra vires control by national constitutional courts (e.g. PSPP, Weiss)