1D: Deductive Arguments - Origins of the Ontological Argument Flashcards

1
Q

What is a deductive argument?

A
  • a form of reasoning. Starts with premises and if you accept these premises as true, then scientific conclusions can be drawn from them.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is an Ontological Argument?

A
  • attempts to prove God existence through deductive reasoning
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Examples of Ontological arguments?

A
  • Anselm (original) - 1033-1109
  • Descartes (development) - 1596-1650
  • Malcolm (development) - 1724-1804
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who was Anselm?

A
  • Italian monk and a theologian of the Roman Catholic Church.
  • he was the Archbishop of Canterbury and constructed his ontological argument as a prayer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Background of Anselm’s argument?

A
  • Anselm was a Catholic monk, who was later made a Saint by the Roman Catholic Church
  • his argument was written in his book Proslogian but as a prayer.
  • has two parts:
    1) Anselm aims to prove God exists
    2) Anselm attempts to prove that God is a ‘Necessary being’ (eternal)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was Anselm’s argument - pt1?

A
  • God is ‘that than which nothing greater can be conceived’ - nothing is greater than God
  • Anselm states that even non-believers can understand this premise
  • ‘is it greater for something to just exists in the mind or in reality as well?’ - everyone would agree things that exist in reality as well as in the mind are ‘greater’
  • Anselm argues that even a fool would have to accept that a God in reality and the mind is greater than just a God in the mind.
  • therefore, we can draw the conclusion that God must exist in reality as well as the mind
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was Anselm’s argument - pt2?

A
  • for Anselm simply proving God exists was not enough - then he would just be like any other human being.
  • ## therefore he wanted to show that God is a ‘necessary being’ as opposed to a ‘contingent being’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly