1C Ethical egoism Flashcards
What is ethical egoism?
- A meta-ethical investigation focused on the agent to give an understanding of norm/behaviour
- Looks at the motives behind an individual’s actions
- Do we behave in a manner purely driven by self-interest?
- Opposed to altruism
In 1928, H.A. Pritchard gave a lecture entitled ‘Duty and Interest’, in which he questioned the true motive behind a dutiful action. How did Richard Norman summarise Pritchard’s argument?
• “Pritchard’s central argument is this: if justice is advocated on the grounds that it is advantageous to the just person, it is thereby reduced to a form of self-interest.”
What is the distinction between ethical egoism and psychological egoism?
- ee = normative view that all action ought to be motivated by self-interest
- pe = descriptive view that all human action is motivated by self-interest
Why does ethical egoism not necessarily mean that we always act selfishly in the narrow understanding of the word?
• Acting out of self-interest can be amalgamated with an action that demonstrates concern for others
• Involves a complex consideration of both short/long-term benefits (an action that overtly benefits another in the short-term may have the covert purpose of self-benefit in the long term) e.g. charity
- Short-term self-interest: interests served immediately my baking one feel good about doing the right thing
- Long-term self-interest: developing character/earning merit for afterlife
What does Frankena say about ethical egoism being unselfish?
• “ee is an ethical theory, not a pattern of action or trait of character, and is compatible with being self-effacing and unselfish in practice”
Give the quote from the 18th Century economist, Adam Smith, that Peter Cave cited.
• “It is not from the benevolence of the butcher…that we expect our dinner, but from their regard to their own interest”
To what extent did Max Stirner accept psychological egoism?
- He recognised that the role of what others identify as self-interest in making moral decisions
- Argued that self-interest incorrectly identified the true nature of the ‘self’
- Once the true self = realised, assertions of p.e. = weakened
What are the five stages to Max Stirner’s argument?
1) Self-interest = always slave to something other than the ‘self’ ∴ not true s.i.
2) We do not make free moral choices in relation to r./philo. systems of moral behaviour as such systems control us
3) True egoism = realising ‘own’ and ‘owness’ by not being driven by r./philo/materialistic frameworks that enslave us
4) True self needs to be free from constraints of external ideologies ∴ unique
5) Only way to engage one’s own uniqueness is to cooperate with other unique individuals by being part of a union of egoists
Explain Stirner’s idea of the delusion of the past and the true nature of self-interest: the ego (Einzige)
• “The habit of the r. way of thinking has biased our mind so…that we deem ourselves depraved by nature, born devils”
• “I am everything to myself and I do everything on my own account.”
• Stirnerian response to being asked for money by poor people: ‘I give money reluctantly’
- I am not free as I do what my conscience tells me is my obligation, despite me not wanting to. To not help those in need would mean I am bad and not fulfilling my duty
What has Stirner been accused of advocating?
• Amoralism
What does the Stanford Encyclopedia say about Stirner being accused of amoralism?
- This is not entirely true as he rejects fixed moral obligations and not values
- “his rejection of the legitimacy of moral claims is not to be confused with a denial of the propriety of all normative judgement”
Explain Stirner’s idea of the future of the self being to realise owness (Eigenheit).
• You must be freed from all obliation to any coscious or subconscious ideal and realise your ‘owness’
• “I am my own when I am master of myself, instead of being mastered either by sesuality or by anything else”
∴ in response to giving money, Stirner would argue: ‘I do as I please/will’
∴ I am free ∵ I am my own person (owness) and not slave to obligation - this is true freedom and self-interest
Explain Stirner’s idea of the future of the self being to activate uniqueness (Einzig).
- The implications of what owness truly means can only be realised through appreciation of oneself as unique
- Being unique = individual freedom from all external conceptual theories
- Being unique does not mean everyone = equal; equality = another conceptual framework; the true egoist has a true appreciation of their self, which inevitably, being unique, cannot be equated with another
What does Stirner reject?
• Egoism as a means for material gain - “one-sided, narrow egoism”
Explain Stirner’s idea of the union of egoists.
- Only way forward = special community unprincipled other than having in common the recognition of thr uniqueness of the egoist - the union of egoists
- Society should be composed with the idea of cooperation prevailing in recognition of one’s uniqueness so that one’s true identity = asserted
- The union would respect uniqueness of each member and support them in their unique pursuit of individual goals, whilsy having no shared final ends
- The union exists purely to help each individual achiever unique goals