1C challenges to inductive arguments Flashcards
who was david hume
Scottish empiricist philosopher, who made an extensive contribution to philosophy. He was a sceptically critiques, the cosmological and teleological argument.
what was david humes’ book called where he criticised the cosmological and teleological argument
dialogues concerning natural religion
what is hume’s challenge to the cosmological argument stating that every effect has a cause
cause and effect may only be an assumption but not a reality
it is only an assumption, not a fact
when two events happen consecutively we habitually interpret some as causes and others as effects
this connection may be erroneous (incorrect)
it is insufficient to make the claim that one causes the other when using our imagination to connect two events
give quote to back up hume’s claim that not every effect has a cause
‘if we believe that fire warms or water refreshes ‘tis only because it costs us too much pain to think otherwise’
link to freuds collective and obsessional neurosis
define fallacy of composition
the false premise that what is true of the parts is true of the whole
what is hume’s challenge to the cosmological argument stating that the universe must have a cause
what is true of the parts need not be true of the whole
to assume that just because there are causes within the universe that the universe itself is caused is the fallacy of composition
hume argues that the universe may be infinite and infinite items do not have a cause, if we apply Ockham’s razor
out of multiple possibilities, the simplest one is most likely to be correct
the simplest answer is that the universe is uncaused and infinite or that it is the cause of its own
give quote from Bertrand Russel about causes
‘just because every human has a mother does not mean the whole of humanity has a mother’
what is hume’s challenge to the cosmological argument stating that the cause of the universe is God
this need not be the God of theism (which aquinas does point out)
a first cause is not necessarily going to be benevolent, personal and intelligent (link to the problem of evil)
what is hume’s challenge to the cosmological argument stating that there is evidence that God exists
we cannot know how or whether the universe began
there is insufficient evidence so it is not possible to talk meaningfully abot God creating universes since we have no expereince creating a universe
we definitely do not have enough evidence to make any conclusions as to what the cause of the universe might be, if there even is a cause
what is hume’s challenge to the cosmological argument about like causes
like causes produce like effects - parent rabbits produce baby rabbits
why should we assume that there is one male ‘parent’ of the universe?
what is hume’s challenge to the cosmological argument about psychology and causation
causation is nothing more than a psychological effect
e.g. is a billard ball hits another, we observe this motion but link the two in our minds, saying that one causes the other to move - there is no evidence of a link
he states that it is a ‘habit of the mind’ to link the two together
what is hume’s challenge to the teleological argument about analogies
there is no human analogy sufficient enough to explain the origins of the universe because it is unique (link to religious language)
just because we know how a house is designed or built does not mean we can infer from this how the universe was designed because it is analogical
the universe demonstrates greater similarities to living organisms than artificial constructs
define authentic designs and apparent designs
authentic designs: God is responsible for designing the whole universe
apparent designs: there is an appearance of design where none actually exists
what is hume’s challenge to the teleological argument about apparent designs
it is a fallacy to assume that the universe is designed simply because it seems so
the universe is an apparent design
what is hume’s challenge to the teleological argument about poor design
how do we know that the universe is designed well?
there is the presence of evil and other creations that put his prime creation in danger (sharks, lions, spiders etc) why would he want to put us in danger?
evidence suggest that the universe is far from being perfect and that the creator is not that of an omnibenevolent God