1B - Involuntary Manslaughter - Unlawful Act Manslaughter - Case List Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

R v Lamb

A

There was no unlawful act as pointing the gun wasn’t assault as they didn’t fear violence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Franklin

A

A civil wrong isn’t enough for liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Lowe

A

CoA held that neglect is a failure to act and could not be UAM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Church

A

The sober and reasonable person would foresee the D’s act would subject some harm to another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

JM and SM

A

Type of harm is completely different from that which was foreseeable but CoA held that a sober and reasonable person only needed to foresee some harm and not a specific type

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Larkin

A

The act of threatening someone was assault and dangerous

D threatened a man with a razor blade to scare him, girlfriend intervened but was drunk, fell on the blade, and died

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Mitchell

A

D punched a man in a post office queue who fell back into an old lady who died from her injuries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Goodfellow

A

D decided to set fire to his council flat so he could be rehoused, but his wife, son, and another died in the fire. CoA convicted him of UAM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Dawson

A

‘emotional disturbance’ on its own isn’t enough to amount to harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Bristow, Dunn and Delay

A

CoA held that a sober and reasonable person would have been the risk of some harm from burglary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Shohid

A

CoA held that the original attack was sufficiently serious as to be a cause of the subsequent death, and it was not necessary that it should be the only cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Carey

A

The victim was not escaping, she was running home, not as a result of the threats. The threats, therefore, did not cause the victim’s death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Roberts

A

The V jumped from the car so as to escape from Roberts sexual advances so therefore did cause her injuried

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Drug use cases - R v Cato

A

Held that there had been an unlawful act of administering a noxious thing (heroin and water) and that that act had caused death. This act broke the chain of causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Drug use cases - R v Dalby

A

The supply of drugs was not the cause of death. It was the V’s act of injecting himself which was the direct cause of death. This act broke the chain of causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Drug use cases - R v Kennedy

A

Despite the D preparing the heroin and water for the V, the V injected it themselves, they didn’t cause the drug to be administered by the V. This act broke the chain of causation

17
Q

Newbury and Jones

A

There is no requirement that the defendant foresees that some harm will result from his action