1970 - 1992 Flashcards

1
Q

What change did Nixon bring to the NAI movement

A
  • On the 8th July 1970, Richard Nixon delivered his presidential
    message to Congress, In which he strongly criticised the
    treatment of Native Americans since the mid-nineteenth
    century.
  • A new direction of Indian policy which aimed at Indian self-
    determination was set forth by President Nixon, he
    condemned forced termination and proposed
    recommendations for specific action.
  • Nixon called on Congress to recognise that this policy had
    failed to improve opportunities for Indians and had, instead,
    condemned them to poverty and distress.
  • As a result, the policy of termination was ended and a reform
    programme was introduced to begin the process of righting
    the wrongs
  • In 1970 Nixon’s pledge to return Indian land began with a
    number of laws authorising the return of tribal lands to the
    Makah and Taos Pueblo Indians
  • In 1972, Land was returned to the Yakama Indians of
    Washington State
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Education Act (1972)

A
  • Nixon placed great emphasis on the improvement of educational
    provision for Indian children and young people
  • The Act involved a substantial increase in federal funding for
    Indian schools, including programmes to build reservation schools
  • The closure of the highly controversial boarding schools was part
    of this reform programme that was continue by Nixon’s
    presidential successors, Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter and was
    probably his lasting legacy to the American Indians.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Indian Self Determination Act (1975)

A
  • Although passed by Congress during the presidency of Nixon’s
    successor, Gerald Ford, was a crucial piece of legislation that was
    clearly influenced by Nixon’s priorities and marked a radical change
    of direction in federal policy.
  • laid down the processes whereby the tribes could negotiate contracts
    with the Bureau of Indian Affairs to take responsibility for their own
    education, health and social service provision. It also authorised the
    allocation of federal funding for these programmes which moved the
    tribes nearer to self sufficiency
  • In its recognition of the right of Native Americans to self-
    determination, the federal government abandoned its long-held belief
    in the necessity for assimilation

-Consequently, although often heralded as the most significant action
since the New Deal, It can be argued that it was of greater
importance than Roosevelt’s policy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Indian Education Assistance Act

1975

A
  • Gave American Indian parents greater involvement in their children’s
    education through membership of their school boards
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Native American Religious Freedom Act (1978)

A
  • Marked an important step forward in this direction by giving to Native
    Americans the rights to ‘believe, express and exercise traditional
    religions including access to sites, use and possession of sacred
    objects and freedom to worship through ceremonials and traditional
    rights.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Indian Child Welfare Act (1978)

A
  • An attempt to determine the rights of Native American parents in
    relation to the continuing practice of forcibly removing Indian children
    from their families

-This was frequently the result of the lack of understanding on the part
of social workers of cultural traditions surrounding child rearing in
American Indian communities, which were interpreted erroneously as
neglect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

List the 1970s Acts

A
  • Education Act (1972)
  • Indian Self Determination Act (1975)
  • Indian Education Assistance Act
    (1975)
  • Native American Religious Freedom Act (1978)
  • Indian Child Welfare Act (1978)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Why was the 1980s a turning point

A
  • In the last two decades of the twentieth century, as the economic
    situation in the USA worsened, funding was cut back
  • This was especially the case during the Ronald Reagans
    presidency 1981-1989; Reagan believed in ‘native capitalism’ as
    means to establish self-sufficiency
  • ‘Native Capitalism’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What was Native Capitalism

A
  • Native capitalism was intended to reduce the burden on federal or
    state expenditure by the development of profit-making
    enterprises by Native Americans themselves
  • In the closing decades of the twentieth century, the Reservation
    Indians did attempt to stimulate their economics by creating small
    businesses such as restaurants, gasoline stations, shops, bingo
    halls, as well as making money from farming, hunting, lumbering,
    fishing and from the film industry.
  • Some built factories in the reservations and provided employment
    for other Indians
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What role did James Wyatt have

A
  • Reagan’s emphasis was on a more vagarious, unregulated capitalism
    combined with tax cuts
  • The main agent of this policy of promoting ‘healthy reservation
    economics’ was James Wyatt, Secretary of the Interior
  • In 1983 suggested that the main cause of the economic and social
    problems of Native Americans such as low wages, a concentration of
    employment in unskilled occupations, a tuberculosis rate six times the
    national average and a similar suicide rate in comparison to other
    ethnic groups, was federal government ‘socialism’, that dominates
    attitudes on the reservations.
  • Wyatt wanted to open up more public and Indian land to commercial
    exploitation.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What policy re-emerged in the 1980s

A

Many Native Americans began to see the signs of a revival of termination policies in these public utterances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How did NAI respond to these policies

A
  • Native American leadership in the 1980s was put on the defensive
    by these policies which gave support to the many economic
    pressure groups who felt that the energy of resources currently
    underneath the reservations were national assets
  • The underlying mood of Native Americans response to
    Reagansim, its policies and promises, can be judged by the cuts
    in social programmes, initiated by a President they described as
    ‘the great fork-tongued liar and the great deceiver who sits in the
    White House.’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What was the impact of Red Power in the 1970s

A
  • Government reforms in the 1970s must be set in the context of the
    increasingly violent and provocative protests orchestrated by AIM
  • Much of the the actions that occurred were as a result of the
    frustration of the slow progress of implementation of social
    reforms

e.g Occupation of Mount Rushmore (1971)
Occupation of Wounded Knee (1973)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What occurred in the occupation of Mount Rushmore (1971)

A
  • In the Black Hills of Dakota
  • Was an attempt to reassert the disputed ownership of the sacred
    burial grounds of the Lakota Sioux Indians

-Established a camp in this area, although these protestors were
eventually evicted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What occurred in the occupation of Wounded Knee (1973)

A
  • Arose following allegations of the suspected financial dealings of the
    president of the Reservation and his maltreatment of its Indian
    inhabitants
  • lasted 71 days and involved resistance to federal
    marshals
  • Acted out of full media coverage
  • This highly publicised protests organised by AIM, raised awareness of
    past injustices, of broken promises and treaties, and were
    undoubtedly influential In bringing about policy changes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What voting issues remained for NAI in the 1970s

A
  • In spite of the fact that Native Americans had the right to vote, as
    they compromised only 1% of the population, they effectively had
    little, if any, capacity to influence policy through the political
    process.
17
Q

What were the negative impacts of the ‘Red Power; movement

A
  • It must also be recognised that these activities impacted
    negatively; they certainly contributed to the slow response to the
    implementation of reforming legislation in the early 1970s as the
    federal authorities interpreted them as acts of violence.
  • Many Native Americans themselves did not believe AIM
    represented their best interests and that the violent methods
    employed by the protestors were not in keeping with Native
    American beliefs and their way of life.
  • Divisions later emerged within the movement itself about the best
    way to bring about change, which limited its impact.
  • By the late 1970s, there were fewer federal actions directly related
    to extending Indian rights
18
Q

What was NARF

A
  • Native American Rights Fund
  • Founded in 1970 to defend the rights of Native Americans and to
    preserve tribal culture and way of life, in particular their right to
    hunt and fish
  • In the early 1970s, it was especially concerned to ensure that
    tribes that had been terminated were re-instated and, above all,
    that they could recover their lost tribal lands including their
    hunting, fishing and water rights.
  • NARF was also responsible for training young Native Americans as
    attorneys with specialism in perusing Native American legal issues
    and secured some landmark decisions

e.g.

  • Fisher v. Montana (1976)
  • United States v. the Sioux Nation (1980)
  • Seminole Tribe v. Butterworth (1982)
  • Charrier v. Bell (1986)
19
Q

Fisher v. Montana (1976)

A

Secured the right of tribal courts to decide on all cases relating to the adoption of Indian children.

20
Q

United States v. the Sioux Nation (1980)

A

The US Supreme Court ruled that the Sioux Indians were entitled to compensation totalling $17.5 million and an additional 5% interest per year since 1877 for the loss of the Black Hills in contravention of the Fort Laramie Treaty.

21
Q

Seminole Tribe v. Butterworth (1982)

A

The Supreme Court ruled that the tribe had the right to establish gambling enterprises on their reservation lands even if gambling enterprises were band by state laws.

22
Q

Charrier v. Bell (1986)

A

NARF lawyers secured the agreement of the court that the remains dug from the ground in Louisiana belonged to the Native-American community. Throughout the 1980s, NARF continued to campaign on this issue. As a result, over 30 states passed laws protecting Indian burial grounds and remains, requiring them to be treated with respect.

23
Q

What was the impact of Red Power in the 1970s

A
  • Government reforms in the 1970s must be set in the context of the
    increasingly violent and provocative protests orchestrated by AIM
  • Much of the the actions that occurred were as a result of the
    frustration of the slow progress of implementation of social
    reforms

e.g Occupation of Mount Rushmore (1971)
Occupation of Wounded Knee (1973)

24
Q

What occurred in the occupation of Mount Rushmore (1971)

A
  • In the Black Hills of Dakota
  • Was an attempt to reassert the disputed ownership of the sacred
    burial grounds of the Lakota Sioux Indians

-Established a camp in this area, although these protestors were
eventually evicted

25
Q

What occurred in the occupation of Wounded Knee (1973)

A
  • Arose following allegations of the suspected financial dealings of the
    president of the Reservation and his maltreatment of its Indian
    inhabitants
  • lasted 71 days and involved resistance to federal
    marshals
  • Acted out of full media coverage
  • This highly publicised protests organised by AIM, raised awareness of
    past injustices, of broken promises and treaties, and were
    undoubtedly influential In bringing about policy changes
26
Q

What voting issues remained for NAI in the 1970s

A
  • In spite of the fact that Native Americans had the right to vote, as
    they compromised only 1% of the population, they effectively had
    little, if any, capacity to influence policy through the political
    process.
27
Q

What were the negative impacts of the ‘Red Power; movement

A
  • It must also be recognised that these activities impacted
    negatively; they certainly contributed to the slow response to the
    implementation of reforming legislation in the early 1970s as the
    federal authorities interpreted them as acts of violence.
  • Many Native Americans themselves did not believe AIM
    represented their best interests and that the violent methods
    employed by the protestors were not in keeping with Native
    American beliefs and their way of life.
  • Divisions later emerged within the movement itself about the best
    way to bring about change, which limited its impact.
  • By the late 1970s, there were fewer federal actions directly related
    to extending Indian rights
28
Q

What was NARF

A
  • Native American Rights Fund
  • Founded in 1970 to defend the rights of Native Americans and to
    preserve tribal culture and way of life, in particular their right to
    hunt and fish
  • In the early 1970s, it was especially concerned to ensure that
    tribes that had been terminated were re-instated and, above all,
    that they could recover their lost tribal lands including their
    hunting, fishing and water rights.
  • NARF was also responsible for training young Native Americans as
    attorneys with specialism in perusing Native American legal issues
    and secured some landmark decisions

e.g.

  • Fisher v. Montana (1976)
  • United States v. the Sioux Nation (1980)
  • Seminole Tribe v. Butterworth (1982)
  • Charrier v. Bell (1986)
29
Q

Fisher v. Montana (1976)

A

Secured the right of tribal courts to decide on all cases relating to the adoption of Indian children.

30
Q

United States v. the Sioux Nation (1980)

A

The US Supreme Court ruled that the Sioux Indians were entitled to compensation totalling $17.5 million and an additional 5% interest per year since 1877 for the loss of the Black Hills in contravention of the Fort Laramie Treaty.

31
Q

Seminole Tribe v. Butterworth (1982)

A

The Supreme Court ruled that the tribe had the right to establish gambling enterprises on their reservation lands even if gambling enterprises were band by state laws.

32
Q

Charrier v. Bell (1986)

A

NARF lawyers secured the agreement of the court that the remains dug from the ground in Louisiana belonged to the Native-American community. Throughout the 1980s, NARF continued to campaign on this issue. As a result, over 30 states passed laws protecting Indian burial grounds and remains, requiring them to be treated with respect.

33
Q

What had changed for the NAI by the 1990s (success)

A
  • By 1992, the tribes were making some progress, at least, trough
    the cases brought before the Supreme Court, towards the
    reclamation of their land lost as a result of broken treaties or
    receiving substantial sums in compensation for the loss
  • These were successes
34
Q

What had changed for the NAI by the 1990s (Unsuccessful)

A
  • However, the ownership of vast tracks of land were
    still disputed
  • By 1990, approximately two-thirds of all Native Americans were
    still dispersed in urban areas throughout the USA
  • Many who were born knew only what had been passed down to
    them of their tribal heritage and culture.
  • In spite of increased government spending on education,
    improved education standards were not reflected in employment
    patterns and standards of living
  • Indian median income was almost half that of all the nation as a
    whole and unemployment remained higher amongst American
    Indians
  • Only one third of Native Americans who inhabited the remaining
    278 reservations and tribal villages benefited from the
    opportunities to re-establish the tribal way of life and
    unemployment remained very high.