19. Jurisdiction Flashcards
What effect does the Hague Convention have on the court’s jurisdiction?
contracting parties can expressly grant jurisdiction to any contracting state (post-October 1st 2015)
- clause must grant exclusive juridisction to relevant state, but if the contract is silent, this is inferred.
- agreement cannot be asymmetric - giving one party non-exclusive jurisdiction cf. other party.
What are the contracting states under the Hague Convention?
EU, Singapore, Mexico, UK, Montenegro.
- if not a member, then consider the common law rules.
What are three ways jurisdiction can be established at common law?
1) Relevance of service - defendant can be served in E&W.
2) Express jurisdiction clause in agreement (ie. Pre-Hague)
3) Apply to court for permission to serve defendant outside jursdiction.
What is the common law test to establish jurisdiction where the court’s permission is required?
1) Need to establish either that:
* claim for remedy is against person domiciled within the jurisdiction.
* governed by English law
* contains a term giving courts in E&W jurisdiction
* contract - breach was committed within jurisdiction.
* tort - damage either (i) sustained or likely to be sustained in jurisdiction; or (ii) results from act committed or likely to be within jurisdiction.
2) Claim must have reasonable prospect of success (relatively low threshold);
3) E&W must be the proper place to bring claim.
* open-ended, consider whether Ws are based, where D normally resides.
How long does a claimant have for service of proceedings outside the jurisdiction?
6 months
How is the governing law for contract claims determined under Rome I?
1) parties choice clause, if any.
Otherwise
2) prescribed rules for different type of contracts.
* sale of goods/services/distributor - seller/distributor /service provider’s habitual residence
* land contract - where land is located.
* place of characteristic performance (not paying party but party providing service/goods).
Then
apply law of country that contract is manifestly connected to (may be diff. country).
How is the governing law for tort claims determined under Rome II?
1) parties choice clause, if any.
* only effective if agreed on AFTER the event.
* unless parties were pursuing commercial activity/freely negotiated.
2) law of country where damage occurs
* except if C/D live in same country.
Then
apply law of country that contract is manifestly connected to
* Not lightly invoked for tort claims.
What procedure should a defendant objecting to the court’s jurisdiction follow?
- File an Acknowledgment of service stating it objects to jurisdiction.
- Make a separate application to court within 14 days