1861-70 Consolidating the Kingdom of Italy Flashcards
What were the 7 obstacles to Italian Unity after 1861?
- The French and Austrians
- Death of Cavour and Political Weakness
- The Papacy
- The Southern Question
- Piedmontisation
- The Brigands War (1861-65)
- Economic and Social Backwardness
Why was France an obstacle to Italian unity after 1861?
- French troops were still in Rome
- Napoleon would not withdraw these troops due to social imperialism (fighting abroad as a distraction to keep homeland problems at bay - wanted to be seen as a saviour of catholicism)
- at a convention in September 1864 Napoleon agreed to evacuate Rome if the Italian capital was switched from Turin to Florence
- when the Government (under Minghetti) agreed to this, there was a storm of protest - 23 died rioting in Turin, Minghetti was sacked
When was the September Convention and what was the agreement?
1864
- French troops would leave Rome if the Italian capital was switched from Turin to Florence
What happened in response to the September Convention?
There was a storm of protest, 23 died rioting in Turin, Minghetti was sacked by VEII
Why was Austria an obstacle to Italian unity after 1861?
- remained in Venetia following their loss of Lombardy
- the Great Powers supported Austria’s position to maintain the balance of power in Europe
- Austria was weakened by the increased power of Prussia (who had made a free trade treaty with France in 1862 and excluded Austria)
- Militarily and diplomatically more powerful than the new Italian state
When did Cavour die?
June 1861
How was the death of Cavour and subsequent political weakness an obstacle to unity after 1861?
- the country had been formed hastily, imperfectly and against the will of many
- a succession of PMs followed Cavour - all of which were largely ignorant of Italian politics
- 1862 Garibaldi set up the Society for the Emancipation of Rome and attempted to seize Rome, in response Rattazzi was forced to send troops to stop him (to keep peace with French) - however this made Rattazzi appear as anti-nationalist and was soon sacked
- king did not support any of the ministers, Farini even tried to stab the king (causing his removal from office)
- all power in the hands of the king
- no republic (Mazzini had hoped for), no federation under the Pope (Gioberti had hoped for) - Mazzini described the new Italy as a “sham”
- Gov was undemocratic, majority was made up of Piedmontese nobility and educated middle class, with narrow electorate of 2%, unrepresentative of the masses (particularly the south)
- king kept title of “the second” rather than first of italy
What did Garibaldi do in 1862?
set up the Society for the Emancipation of Rome and attempted to take the city - resulted in Rattazzi sending troops and appearing anti-nationalist, was soon removed from office
Which PM tried to stab VEII?
Farini
What was the electorate of the new kingdom of Italy?
2%
What were the positive political changes in Italy after 1861?
- a single criminal legal code was adopted (except for Tuscany)
- civil law code in the whole of Italy from 1865
- unified army formed and modernised under Prussian guidance
- unified navy
- schools and universities under state control
How much land did the Pope lose to the new kingdom of Italy?
2/3
How was the papacy an obstacle to Italian unity after 1861?
- Pope land confiscated, nationalists wanted Rome as the capital, temporal power had been lost due to Risorgimento, spiritual power under threat by the scientific theory (e.g. Darwin’s Origins of Species, 1859)
- period of Fractious Cohabitation began (uneasy relationship between the state and church)
- Papacy’s response to new Italy was to create the Syllabus of Errors (1864) claiming church would retain control over education and all culture and science, reassert temporal power, attacked liberalism, nationalism, religious tolerance etc, would not accept progress and modern civilisation
- in response new Italy began to attack church, increased church taxation, began to confiscate property in 1866
- in 1870, the Dogma of Papal Infallibility was issued, claiming the Pope’s statements to be indisputable - marked the spiritual supremacy of the Pope
- Pope declared himself a prisoner in the Vatican following Rome annexation in 1870
When was the Syllabus of Errors introduced and what did this do?
- 1864
- reactionary set of ideals, claiming church would have control over all education, all culture and science, rejected progress and modern civilisation, liberalism and nationalism
When was the Dogma of Papal Infallibility issued and what did this do?
- 1870
- stated all Pope’s statements were indisputable
How did the Southern Question act as an obstacle to Italian unity after 1861?
- during the plebiscites of 1860 people voted against the tyranny of the rulers and revolts of the peasants rather than unification
- voting systems were corrupt e.g. in Nice the “no” slips weren’t brought to the voting stations, “yes” voters didn’t know what they were voting for
- Piedmontese politicians knew little of the south
- south backwardness and poverty made it unsuitable for unification with Piedmont e.g. 1859 Casati Law made primary education compulsory but was never introduced to the south as the majority were illiterate
- Sicily and Naples had a long tradition of regional autonomy
- Cavour considered a “self government” for the south, but decided to crush any opposition (e.g. from Bourbon loyalists, Garibaldi’s army remnants, peasants demanding reform etc) following 1860 uprising by Bourbon agents
What is an example of the south being unsuitable for unification with the north?
1859 Casati Law to make primary education compulsory was never introduced to the south as the majority were illiterate
What does Cavour’s proposal of a “self government” in the south mean?
- self-governing system would oppose unity, shows Cavour/Piedmont was never interested in uniting the north and south, perhaps just Piedmontese expansion of the north
How was Piedmontisation an obstacle to Italian unity after 1861?
- Piedmont’s systems were imposed over the whole peninsula
- south’s distinct features and deep-rooted problems made it unsuitable for this e.g. the legal system in Naples was changed by 53 decrees in 2 days in 1861
- new kingdom divided into 53 provinces each governed by a prefect
- all coinage, customs, measures were standardised
- Piedmontese constitution became the Italian constitution
- the process showed ignorance of regional affairs in Italy (north ignorance of conditions in the south) e.g. Cavour never travelled further south than Tuscany
- education payed for by attacking the Church, leading to the dissolution of 2382 monasteries, this deprived areas of charitable institutions which the state did not replace (detrimental to the south)
- jury system introduced to the south but was corrupted by the mafia
- Piedmont had neither the resources of manpower to administer the south well
- Lombardy was already developed within itself, had its own legal system, education system and local government that were swept aside for Piedmontisation
How was Naples’ legal system changed by piedmontisation?
changed by 53 decrees in 2 days (1861)
How many provinces was the new kingdom of Italy divided into?
53 provinces each governed by a prefect
What shows politician ignorance of the south?
Cavour never travelled further south than Tuscany
How many monasteries were shut during Piedmontisation and why?
2382 closed down as education had to be payed for by attacking the church