18. Profits Flashcards
What is a profit?
1) Holder of profit benefits from;
2) Right to take soil/substance from another’s land (servient tenement)
- NOT possess/enjoy
- Minerals, timber, oil, fish
How may profits be terminated?
(END CRAMPS)
Estoppel
- Servient tenement Holder’s conduct + reasonable reliance + change of position
Necessity
- Expires as soon as necessity ends
Destruction
- NOT voluntary
- Structures
Condemnation
- Of servient tenement
- Taking (5A/14A) => Dominant tenement holder is entitled to just compensation
Release (written)
- Dominant holder => Servient holder
- Concurrent conveyance
Abandonment
1) Intent
2) Permanent abandonment
- NOT mere non-use (even for ‘long’ period)
Merger of ownership
- Dominant tenement
- Servient tenement (equal/longer duration, e.g. Fee simple vs Life Estate)
- NO revival by separation
Prescription (Servient tenement)
1) Continuous
- Statutory period
- NO need for constant use
2) Open + Notorious
- Discoverable upon inspection
- E.g. Underground/non-visible uses (pipes, electric lines)
3) Adverse
- NO Owner’s consent
- NO need to be exclusive (Owner can use too) (unlike AP)
4) Hostile
5) Substantial interference with Servient Holder’s possession => Indicate to public that profit has terminated
Surcharge
- Misuse of profit => Surcharges servient tenement
What is the difference between easements and profits?
Easement
- Right to use land
- Appurtenant transferrable (NOT to BFP)
- In gross transferrable (for commercial purpose)
- NOT terminable by misuse
Profit
- Right to take resources from land
- Appurtenant transferrable (NOT overly increasing burden)
- In gross transferrable (with exclusivity)
- Terminable by misuse
How may profits be created expressly?
By grant (easement > 1 year) (SOF)
1) Writing
2) Signed by servient tenement holder
3) Description (Parties + Land)
By reservation
1) Grantor conveys title to Grantee
2) ONLY Grantor reserves right to use land for special purpose
- Otherwise if TPs’ rights are reserved => Easement is VOID
How may profits be created by implication (not statute of frauds)?
By existing use (quasi-easement)
1) Apparent + Continuous use on servient tenement
2) Reasonably necessary for enjoyment on dominant tenement
3) NOT interfere with others’ uses
From subdivision
- Grantees’ use must NOT substantially interfere with Owner’s current use
By necessity
- Owner sells land and deprive access to public road/utility alike
- Owner of servient tenement to locate easement
How may profits be created by prescription?
(COAH)
1) Continuous
- Statutory period
- NO need for constant use
2) Open + Notorious
- Discoverable upon inspection
- E.g. Underground/non-visible uses (pipes, electric lines)
3) Adverse
- NO Owner’s consent
- NO need to be exclusive (Owner can use too) (unlike AP)
4) Hostile