18-22: Pool Flashcards
How does nuclear-cytoplasmic transport fundamentally differ from other protein translocation systems in the cell?
- Substrates can be large and complex
- Cargo is FOLDED
- Bi-directional transport
What are NPCs and the key facts about them?
Nuclear Pore Complexes - large structures (125 Mda) with 8-fold symmetry, through which nuclear transport occurs
They are composed of 30+ Nuceloporins (which often contain “FG Repeats” - short clusters of hydrophobic Phe-X-Phe-Gly resides separated by hydrophilic linkers)
There are around 3000-4000 per nucleus
What does the proportion of different proteins (e.g., Lysozyme, Ovalbumin, Globulin) that enter the nucleus reveal about nuclear transport?
For small proteins (e.g., Lysozyme, Cyt C), 12% ends up in the nucleus after 24 hours - since the nucleus is around 12% of the cell volume, this suggests small molecules simply diffuse in
Proteins larger than around 60 kDa (e.g., Globulin) cannot diffuse in, as less than 1% ends up in the nucleus
Cite and describe the experiment that demonstrated that nuclear transport of larger proteins is selective and requires a signal
Laskey, R. (1982) Nucleoplasmin
When the nucleoplasmin pentamer is placed in the cytosol, it is transported into the nucleus (despite being very large)
When the tail alone was placed in the cytosol, it was transported in
When the core alone was placed in the cytosol, it was NOT transported in
When the core alone was placed in the nucleus, it remained in the nucleus
-> These findings suggest that nucleoplasmin accumulates in the nucleus via Selective Entry and remains in the nucleus via Selective Retention, due to an import signal in the tail
Describe the structure and significance of NLSs
Nuclear Localisation Signals:
1-2 stretches of BASIC residues (lots of K and R) which are both necessary and sufficient for nuclear accumulation
Mutants in NLSs block nuclear entry (e.g., SV40 Large T-antigen K128A/T), while the addition of an NLS to a cytosolic protein leads to nuclear accumulation (e.g., Pyruvate Kinase)
In nucleoplasmin, the signal sequence was discovered by repeating the earlier experiment with smaller and smaller tail fragments, until the exact signal region was found
What experimental evidence initially implied the existence of NLS receptors?
Adding NLS-albumin conjugates was shown to block the import of most proteins
-> Therefore, the import process is saturatable due to some limiting factor (presumably NLS receptors)
What proved that nuclear import requires Cytosolic Factors?
Adam and Gerace (1990)
SV40 successfully imported in control cell
When cell was semi-permebilised with low concentration of detergent, NO import (SV40 remains in cytosol)
When cell was semi-permeabilised, then cytosol + energy added back in, SUCCESSFUL transport
After proving that cytosolic factors are required for import, how were these cytosolic factors identified?
Fractioning of the cytosolic extract via gel filtration chromatography
Then, each fraction was tested (as before) with the semi-permeabilised cell import assay
Certain fractions (A and B) allowed some import activity (about half of normal import activity)
Pooling fractions A and B restored almost normal import
Therefore, the key factors must be contained within fractions A and B
What are the four soluble factors, required for import of NLS-containing cargo, that were discovered from the fraction assay?
Discovered in Fraction A:
- Importin-alpha (NLS-binding protein)
- Importin-ß (Dimerises with Imp-a and interacts with FG repeats of NPC)
Discovered in Fraction B:
- Ran (small GTPase)
NTF2 (interacts with Ran)
What are the two steps of nuclear import (and what experimental evidence demonstrates which fractions are necessary for each step)?
- DOCKING (energy independent)
-> Impß interacts with FG sequences of cytosolic fibrils - TRANSLOCATION (energy, Ran, and NTF2-dependent)
-> Cargo carried into nucleus
If JUST Fraction A added, rim staining at Nuclear Envelope (presumably, factors in this fraction dock with NPCs, but no nuclear transport
If add A+B, nuclear staining shows successful nuclear transport (presumably, something in fraction is required for the actual import)
Describe the Ran GTPase Cycle
Ran is a GTPase, and is converted from its inactive form (RanGDP) to its active form (RanGTP) by the GEF RCC1
It is inactivated via hydrolysis by RanGAP1
Since RCC1 is mainly found in the nucleus (tightly bound to chromatin) and RanGAP1 is mainly found in the cytosol (excluded from nucleus), Ran is mainly active in the nucleus and inactive in the cytosol
-> A GRADIENT of RanGTP exists across the Nuclear Envelope
Describe the experimental evidence for the role of the RanGTP gradient in NLS-cargo import
Use cells expressing a temperature-sensitive mutant of RCC1 (inactive at 39C)
At permissive temperature, GFP-NLS shows successful import into nucleus
At 39C (Western Blot shows RCC1 successfully blocked), GFP-NLS shows lack of nuclear import
Describe how the RanGTP gradient affects Importins
Importins bind cargo in the absence of RanGTP (in the cytosol) and carry it into the nucleus
Once inside the nucleus, RanGTP binds to Impß, causing Cargo+Imp-a to be released (which then dissociate from each other)
Impß, bound to RanGTP, is then transported OUT into the cytosol (via the NPCs due to its FG sequence), where RanGTP is hydrolysed to RanGDP by RanGAP1
Impß is then released from the inactive RanGDP, and can bind to Imp-a + Cargo once again
Describe the experimental evidence for the Existence of the RanGTP gradient
Use a RanGTP-sensitive probe, and FRET/CFP analysis:
Nucleus appears Blue (high RanGTP) while cytosol appears green (low RanGTP)
Given that Imp-a LACKS FG sequences (unlike Impß), how does Imp-a get back into the cytosol (and what is the experimental evidence for this process)?
Nuclear Export - this requires the RanGTP gradient AND Exportins (e.g., CAS)
RanGTP Gradient:
- Experiment on Xenopus oocytes
- Add RanGAP1 to nucleus, so RanGDP in both nucleus and cytosol (no gradient)
- U1 and U5 snRNA fail to export into cytosol (whereas in control cell they are mostly exported)
Exportins:
- Export receptors work similarly to importins, but in reverse
- In the nucleus, Exportins bind RanGTP, which promotes cargo binding, then pass through NPCs to the cytosol
- In the cytosol, RanGTP is hydrolysed to RanGDP, which then dissociates from the exportin, so the cargo is released, and the exportin is transported back to the nucleus
In this case, Imp-a specifically is exported by CAS
What is an NES?
A Nuclear Export Signal:
- A short, hydrophobic, Leu-rich sequence
- Found on proteins exported from the nucleus
- Recognised by the export receptor CRM1
How can NES-containing proteins play a role in RNA export?
They can act as adaptor proteins - for example:
HIV-1 Rev Protein binds a stem-loop structure in viral RNA, while also binding CRM1 via its NES
Thus, the virus is able to “hijack” the export machinery to transport its genomic RNA into the cytoplasm for packaging
What is Exportin-t
The export receptor specifically for tRNA
How does Bulk mRNA Transport differ from export of HIV RNA or Importin-alpha?
It does NOT require an Imp-ß like export receptor - instead, splicing and export are coupled via a mediating protein called TAP/Mex67p
This protein forms a complex with Mtr2, allowing it to interact with the NPC
Meanwhile, it does NOT bind the mRNA directly, but rather binds the Exon-Junction Complex of RNA that has been spliced (preventing export of UNspliced RNA)
The requirement for TAP (and the difference in mechanism from nuclear IMPORT) is shown by the mex67-5 ts mutant, which blcoks polyA mRNA export, but does not affect nuclear import
[HIV viral RNA needs an additional adaptor (Rev) precisely BECAUSE it is not yet spliced]
Given that each nuclear transport event removes one Ran molecule from the nucleus, how does Ran get back in?
NTF2 (a 10kDa homodimer) binds both RanGDP and NPCs, then carries RanGDP into the nucleus
RanGDP is then converted to active RanGTP by RCC1, and dissociates, allowing NTF2 to pass BACK into the cytosol
Describe the role of Ran in Cell Division
Ran is required for the assembly of the mitotic spindle:
- The chromatin appears to promote formation of the spindle in mitotic extract - this is because RCC1 is bound to the chromatin, so this is where RanGTP is concentrated
- Adding RanGDP or RanGAP blocks spindle formation
Mechanism:
- TPX2 is inactive in most areas of the cell as it is bound to Imp-a and Imp-ß
- However, near the chromatin, RanGTP binds Impß, so TPX2 is released and becomes active
- TPX2 then promotes spindle assembly via nucleation and phosphorylation of several proteins
- It forms a complex with NEDD1 and RHAMM to nucleate MTs
- Also activates AuroraA kinase
Conclusion: Ran is a very versatile molecule! (In both roles, it provides POSITIONAL INFORMATION)
What is mRNA Localisation and what are some key examples?
While most mRNAs are distributed uniformly in the cytoplasm, some must be specifically localised before translation:
- ß-actin localised at leading edge of cell
- MAP2 and MBP in Neurons
- Ash1 and Oxa1 in S. cerevisiae
71% of Drosophila embryo mRNAs show some degree of localisation