17 - Nomadic Empires and Eurasian Integration Flashcards
What did the Mogols do that has a long-term significance in world history?
- Maintained courier network
- Nomadic people dependent on commerce with settled agricultural societies so worked to secure safety of trade routes and merchants
- Encouragement of travel and communication which facilitated trade, diplomatic travel, missionary efforts, tech diffusion, and movement of people to new lands
- Maintained courier network
- Lands as distant as China and western Europe became directly linked for the first time
- As nomadic people had limited skilled artisans and educated people but needed these for large empire; Often recruited from conquered peoples and allies and moved them where needed in empire
How did the Mongols facilitate interregional trade and cross-cultural diffusion of technologies and culture?
Protection of trade routes and merchants
Also frequently hired foreigners as administrators, especially in China
Why did the Mongol khanates, the Delhi sultanate, and Tamerlane have initial successes but fail to maintain their power?
Describe the Pax Mogolica
- 4 khanates protected merchants and trade routes across much of Eurasia
- Peace led to tremendous transfer of culture and technology
What earlier nomadic structures did post-classical nomadic peoples bring when they took over settled societies?
- Family- or clan-based and relatively egalitarian social structures
- Mongol rulers valued advice of wives as much as male advisors
- Sometimes kept living in yurts
Describe the influence of nomadic peoples in post-classical Eurasia
- Between 11th and 15th century nomadic peoples became more prominant than ever
- Turkish peoples migrated to Persia, Anatolia, and India and established new states
- During 13th and 14th centuries Mongols cam to dominate central Asia steppes and then invaded settled societies in China, Persia, Russia and eastern Europe
- By early 14th century Mongols had largest empire world had every seen from Korea and China in the east to Russia and Hungary in the west
Describe military campaigns of nomadic peoples
- Sometimes extraordinarily destructive
- Often demolished cities, slaughtered urban populations, and ravaged surrounding agricultural lands
Why did women play such prominant social and economic roles in nomadic pastoral societies?
- Able-bodied men were frequently away on hunting expeditions or military campaigns
- Women were primarily responsible for tending to the animals
Compare gender relations in nomadic pastoral societies to settled agricultural societies
- Adult males dominated in both
- Women’s status higher in nomadic pastoral
- Women responsible for animals because men away on hunting expeditions or miltary campaigns
- Excellent horse riders and skilled archers and sometimes fought in war
- Economic and sometimes military role meant had considerable influence - sometimes as advisors in family or clan matters and occasionally as rulers
yurt
Tents used by nomadic Turkish and Mongol tribes
kumiss
Alcoholic drink of the nomadic groups of central Asia made of fermented mare’s milk
Turkish peoples
- Clans and tribes that often fought with each other
- Spoke related languages
- Nomads
- Expanded influence until dominated the steppes of central Asia and the settled societies in Persia, Anatolia and India
Describe the nomadic pastoralist of central Asia
Central Asia does not have enough rain for large scale agriculture so kept herds of animals
Moved frequently to take advantage of local climactic conditions
Lived mostly off their animals
Lived in yurts
No large-scale craft production
Few and small human settlements that were often temporary
Relationships between nomadic and settled peoples in central Asia
- Small scale trade because nomads had limited needs
- BUT because of mobility and familiarity with central Asia, nomadic peoples were suited to lead the caravans that cross central Asia and linked settled societies from China to the Mediterranean
- During the post-classical era and after, Turkish peoples were especially prominant on the caravan routes
Social class in nomadic societies in central Asia
- 2 classes - elites and commoners
- Elite charismatic leaders had the prestige to organize clans and tribes into alliances
- Elite leaders did little governing except during times of war when they had absolute authority
- Nomadic nobility was a fluid class - heirs could lose status over generations and commoners could displace established leaders