16 markers AO3 Flashcards
Localisation (case study)
P: supporting evidence
E: phineas gage -> damaged left frontal lobe in railroad accident and had a personality change from calm to quick tempered
E: case study of neurological damage shows frontal lobe is responsible for regulation mood, showing mood is localised to that area’
L: supports localisation
CA: problems w/ case studies -> difficult to make meaningful generalisations from the findings of a single individual. Conclusions drawn may depend on subjective interpretation of researcher.
Localisation (brain scans)
P: supportive evidence
E: peterson used brain scans to demonstrate how wernicke’s area was active during a listening task and brocas was active during a reading task
E: shows many everyday brain functions are localised -> lang centres found in wernickes and brocas and localised to LH (distinguishable and separate)
Extra: supported by methodology -> nomothetic method provides empirical evidence that gives a scientific cred to research, increases validity and reliability
Localisation (counter argument)
P: Language production may not be confined to Broca’s area alone
E: Dick and Tremblay -> only 2% of modern researchers think that language in the brain is completely controlled by Broca’s area and Wernicke’s areas. This is supported through modern FMRI scans that show language function is distributed more holistically and lang streams have been identified across the cortex
E: this is a limitation bc it suggests that the localisation may be an outdated theory and provide a limited explanation for brain function. With modern research providing a more scientific basis with empirical evidence, it provides a strong foundation to counter localisation
L: localisation theory may provide only a partial explanation, and so more modern theories such as brain plasticity and functional recovery could prove to be more well rounded explanations
Hemispheric Lateralisation (forest)
P: split brain has provided considerable research into lateralisation of brain function
E: fink et al -> pet scans used to identify which brain areas were active during a visual process task -> asked to attend to global elements of an image (e.g. a forest) RH was active,, focusing on finer details (e.g. one tree) activated the LH
E: shows left is centred on verbal and analytical tasks and right more on spatial and creative tasks
L: provides theory w/ validity
Hemispheric Lateralisation (sample)
P: problems w/ sample
E: the sample was small and had limited amount of split brain patients available but it unethical to manipulate IV so there was little that could be done to change this
E: regardless, it reduces population validity bc it’s a unique group so there’s considerable difficulty generalising to the wider population
L: weakness in methodology reduces external validity of the study and questions the necessity of the material if it can’t be applied well on a wider scale
Hemispheric Lateralisation (age)
P: Lateralisation may only be applicable for certain age groups
E: Szaflarski et al found that language became more lateralised to the left hemisphere in children and adolescents but lateralisation decreased after 25 as lateralised functions switched to bilateral functions in adulthood
E: suggests lateralisation changes with normal ageing. This may likely be because using the extra processing resources of the other hemisphere may compensate for age-related declines in function
L: research into lateralisation is not as effective for the wider population as it cannot be generalised to all age groups
Plasticity (age)
P: while there is evidence for plasticity, it is possible that this can deteriorate with age
E: research has shown that the capacity for neural reorganisation is much greater in children than in adults
E: this may explain why adults find change more demanding than young people do
L: Therefore, we must consider individual differences amongst people when assessing the likelihood of plasticity in the brain
CA: Bezzola et al observed increased motor cortex activity in the novice golfers compared to a control group, suggesting more efficient neural representations after training.
This suggests that neural representations does continue throughout the lifespan and may not deteriorate with age as much as expected
Plasticity (phantom) !!!!!
P: plasticity may have negative behaviour consequences
E: 60-80% of amputees have phantom limb syndrome which causes unpleasant even painful sensations which are thought to be caused by the cortical reorganisation in the somatosensory cortex
E: this suggests that the brain’s ability to adapt to damage is not always beneficial and can reduce people’s qualities of life
Functional recovery (practical app)
P: one strength of research into functional recovery is its practical application
E: understanding the processes involved has contributed to the field of neurorehabilitation, where techniques such as movement therapy and electrical stimulation of the brain are used following a stroke, to encourage axonal growth
E: without this research, we wouldn’t know the importance of having these supervisions in place to encourage recovery, and account for the natural slowing-down of spontaneous bodily recovery post-trauma
L: consequently, an understanding of functional recovery has proved vital in helping ppl get better after trauma
Functional recovery (EB)
P: supporting evidence for research into functional recovery
E: patient EB had most of his left-brain hemisphere removed at the age of two and a half. Through the help of intensive rehab, he had little to no language problems and performed normally on many tasks including visuospatial skills and facial recognition
E: this shows that the functional organisation of lang areas in EB’s RH largely mirrored what’s seen in the healthy left hemisphere of controls. This supports the idea of the recruitment of homologous area on opposite sides of the brain, so that specific tasks can still be performed
L: As a result, research has demonstrated that the brain is able to rewire itself and recover from significant trauma
CA: pp variables can affect how well someone recovers following a brain trauma such as education (and iq?)
Strengths of EEGs
- not an invasive process (no surgery required)
- high temporal resolution (can detect brain activity at a resolution of one millisecond)
- contributed to our understanding of the stages of sleep and enabled the diagnosis of disorders such as epilepsy
Weaknesses of EEGs
- can only detect activity in regions of the brain closer to surface so cannot reveal what is going on in deeper regions such as hypothalamus. Electrodes can be planted in non-humans but this is unethical in humans
- generalised info abt brain activity - not useful for pinpointing exact source of neural activity (electrical activity can be picked up by several neighbouring electrodes so does not allow researchers to distinguish between activities originating in different but closely adjacent areas)
Strengths of ERPs
- not an invasive process (no surgery required)
- specific measurement of neural processing and electrical activity in the brain
- Excellent temporal resolution have led to use in measurement of specific cognitive functions and deficits, such as reading ability
Weaknesses of ERPs
- requires a large no. Of trials to get meaningful data. Places limitations on the questions this technique can realistically answer when trying to investigate the brain
- can only detect activity in regions of the brain closer to surface so cannot reveal what is going on in deeper regions such as hypothalamus. Electrodes can be planted in non-humans but this is unethical in humans
- difficult to eliminate background noise and extraneous material to get pure data
Strengths of FMRIs
- not an invasive process (no surgery required)
- produces 3d images with high spatial resolution - giving detail by the millimetre