15.5 Flashcards
An auditor’s report included an additional paragraph disclosing that there is a difference of opinion between the auditor and the client for which the auditor believed an adjustment to the financial statements should be made. The opinion paragraph of the auditor’s report most likely expressed
A qualified opinion.
The most likely reason for including a separate paragraph disclosing a difference of opinion with the client is that the selection or application of an accounting principle is not in accordance with the applicable reporting framework.
An adverse opinion most likely should be expressed when
Management uses an accounting policy not in accordance with the applicable reporting framework.
When management uses an accounting policy not in accordance with the applicable reporting framework, an adverse opinion is expressed if (1) the misstatement of the financial statements is material and (2) the effects are pervasive.
In a financial statement audit, an auditor disclaims an opinion because of an inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence. The most likely reason for this result is
Management’s prevention of the confirmation of receivables.
The auditor disclaims an opinion due to an inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence after concluding that the possible effects on the financial statements of undetected misstatements, if any, could be material and pervasive. This scope limitation may result from (1) circumstances not controlled by the entity, such as destruction or government seizure of accounting records; (2) circumstances related to the nature or timing of the work, such as not being able to observe inventory or determining that controls are ineffective; or (3) limitations imposed by management, such as preventing the auditor from (a) observing inventory or (b) confirming receivables.
A closely held manufacturing company must disclose all of the following information in audited financial statements except
Replacement cost of inventory.
A U.S. manufacturer should report inventory at full absorption cost unless the fair value is less than cost. Neither closely nor publicly held companies must report replacement cost of inventory.
The date of the audit report is important because
The auditor cannot date the report earlier than the date on which sufficient appropriate evidence to support the opinion has been obtained.
The auditor cannot date the report until sufficient appropriate evidence has been obtained. This date informs users that the auditor has considered the effects of events and transactions occurring up to that date of which the auditor became aware.
On February 13, Year 2, Fox, CPA, met with the audit committee of the Gem Corporation to review the draft of Fox’s report on the company’s financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, Year 1. On February 16, Year 2, Fox completed all remaining field work and obtained sufficient appropriate evidence to support the opinion on the financial statements. On February 28, Year 2, the final report was mailed to Gem’s audit committee. What date most likely would be used on Fox’s report?
February 16, Yr 2.
The report should be dated no earlier than the date on which the auditor has obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence. February 16, Year 2, is the date that Fox obtained sufficient appropriate evidence to support the opinion on the financial statements. The auditor is not responsible for making any inquiries or carrying out any audit procedures for the period after the date of the report (but see AU-C 925).
The existence of audit risk is recognized by the statement in the auditor’s report that the auditor
Obtains reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.
The existence of audit risk is recognized by the statement in the auditor’s report that the auditor obtained reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. Audit risk is the risk that the auditor expresses an inappropriate audit opinion when the financial statements are materially misstated. Audit risk exists because the assurance is not absolute. Reasonable assurance is obtained when the auditor has obtained sufficient appropriate evidence to reduce audit risk to an acceptably low level (AU-C 200).
Under which of the following circumstances would a disclaimer of opinion not be appropriate?
Management does not provide reasonable justification for a change in accounting principles.
If (1) the new principle and the method of accounting for the effect of the change are in accordance with the applicable reporting framework, (2) disclosures are adequate, and (3) the entity has justified that the principle is preferable, the auditor expresses an unmodified (unqualified) opinion. Otherwise, if the change is material, the misstatement results in expression of a qualified or an adverse opinion in the report for the year of change.
Which of the following occurs when an adverse opinion is expressed on the financial statements?
The auditor’s responsibility section changes.
The auditor’s responsibility section is changed to state, “We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our adverse audit opinion.”
Just before the client’s annual physical inventory count at year-end, circumstances made the auditor’s attendance impracticable. The auditor determined that alternative audit procedures did not provide sufficient appropriate audit evidence of the existence and condition of the inventory at year-end. The possible effects on the financial statements are material. But they are confined to specific accounts and are not a substantial proportion of the financial statements. Assuming the financial statements are otherwise fairly presented, the auditor should express a(n)
Qualified opinion.
The auditor expresses a qualified opinion because of an inability to obtain sufficient appropriate evidence if the possible effects on the financial statements are material but not pervasive. The possible effects of not observing the inventory count are material but not pervasive. They are confined to specific elements, accounts, or items of the financial statements and are not a substantial proportion of the financial statements.
An auditor expresses a qualified opinion because of a material misstatement related to specific amounts in the financial statements. Which of the following phrases should be included in the report?
“When read in conjunction with Note X”:
“With the foregoing explanation”:
No
No
The auditor should use the phrase “except for” to qualify an opinion, and include a reference to a paragraph that describes the deficiency. Given a qualification because of a material misstatement related to specific amounts in the financial statements, the reference should describe the matter resulting in the qualification. It also should include (1) a description and quantification of the financial effects, if practicable; (2) an explanation of how narrative disclosures are misstated; or (3) omitted information, if practicable, and a description of its nature. However, if financial-effects disclosures are made in a note to the statements, the report may refer to it. Furthermore, the notes are part of the financial statements, and a phrase such as “when read in conjunction with Note X” in the report is likely to be misunderstood. Also, wording such as “with the foregoing explanation” is neither clear nor forceful enough.
An auditor of a nonissuer was engaged by the client to use PCAOB auditing standards to conduct the audit. The auditor should refer in the report to
PCAOB Auditing Standards:
GAAS:
Yes
Yes
The audit of financial statements of a nonissuer in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB is not within the jurisdiction of the PCAOB. The auditor must conduct the audit in accordance with GAAS. In such circumstances, the auditor should use the form of report required by the standards of the PCAOB, amended to state that the audit also was in accordance with GAAS.
Limitation on the scope of the audit may require the auditor to express a qualified opinion or to disclaim an opinion. Which of the following is a limitation on the scope of the audit?
The unavailability of sufficient appropriate evidence.
A limitation on the scope of the audit is defined as an auditor’s inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence. It may result from (1) circumstances not controlled by the entity, (2) circumstances related to the nature or timing of audit work, or (3) limitations imposed by management. An auditor’s inability to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence results in a qualified opinion (disclaimer of opinion) when the possible effects of undetected misstatements are material but not pervasive (material and pervasive) (AU-C 705).
A limitation on the scope of the audit sufficient to preclude an unmodified opinion is most likely to result when management
Refuses to permit its lawyer to respond to the letter of audit inquiry.
Direct communication with the entity’s external legal counsel should be made if actual or potential litigation, claims, or assessments may result in a risk of material misstatement. If management refuses to permit this communication, the auditor should modify the opinion.
Under which of the following circumstances would an auditor’s expression of an unmodified opinion for a nonissuer be inappropriate?
The auditor is unable to obtain the audited financial statements of a significant subsidiary.
An auditor’s inability to obtain sufficient appropriate evidence may arise from, among other things, circumstances related to the nature or timing of the auditor’s work. An example is an inability, not resulting from a management-imposed limitation, to obtain audited financial statements of a long-term investee. If the possible effects are material, the auditor expresses a qualified opinion or disclaims an opinion, depending on pervasiveness (AU-C 705).