1.2b Campaigns for Sufferage

Question 1

Debates over suffrage

Answer 1

Some historians have argued that the Suffragettes were too militant in their actions and actually hindered their cause by alienating the government.

Some historians argue that Suffragists were more effective because they used peaceful methods, and their contribution to suffrage has been underappreciated.

Question 2

Suffragists

Answer 2

Suffragists tried to achieve the vote using peaceful methods, trying to get a bill passed in the Houses of Parliament.

Suffragists tried to organise cross-party support and convince and lobby politicians of the importance of female suffrage.

Suffragists used peaceful demonstrations and gathered support with petitions.

Suffragists were successful in getting bills to parliament, but none were made into law.

Question 3

Suffragettes

Answer 3

Suffragettes such as the Women’s Social and Political Union (WSPU) used direct action and militant methods to show the urgency of women’s suffrage.

Militant methods included setting fire to buildings, attacking post boxes, and attempting to hurt politicians.

Campaigners were imprisoned for their actions.

Suffragettes in prison went on hunger strike and were force-fed.

These actions made their struggle public, and many people criticised the Liberal government.

Question 4

Advantages for Votes at 16

Answer 4

Supporters argue that 16-18-year-olds can pay income tax, choose to get married and join the army, but are not represented in parliament.

Young people are taught about citizenship and politics in school, so are educated about politics.

Question 5

Disadvantages for Votes at 16

Answer 5

Opposers argue that under 18s are not mature enough to make political decisions.

Few countries allow votes at 16.

Youth turnout is usually low in elections, so under 18 turnout isn’t expected to be different.