1.2 Sources of Contemporary Law - Common Law Flashcards
what is common law?
refers to laws created within the court (case law or judge-made law)
what is precedent?
judges must resolve disputes considering previous decisions in similar cases
what are the precedent aims/benefits?
it ensures consistency; increase equality between parties; improve transparency; parties have knowledge/suggestion of outcome
what is BINDING precedent?
judges of lower courts MUST follow the precedent set by the higher courts, and are bound by ratio decidendi of the higher court, ONLY when cases are sufficiently similar.
what does ratio decidendi mean?
reason for decision
what is PERSUASIVE precedent?
may influence decision, however, judges are not bound to follow (e.g. different court jurisdiction decisions, judicial statements, lower court decisions, etc.)
what is opiter dicta?
statements made by a higher court judge may be taken into account, but don’t create precedent.
what does the inquisitorial system of trial involve
(this is NOT used in Australia)
judges are more actively involved in the case and are able to admit evidence, decide upon what questions are asked, and can decide which witnesses will be called.
what does the adversarial system of trial involve?
two parties (prosecution & defence), arguing their case in front of a ‘neutral third party’ judge (higher courts), magistrate (lower courts), and/or jury
what is the process of the adversarial system court?
each side has control over what evidence it introduces to the court and over the witness it may call to support its case → then cross-examined by the opposing side.
what are the positives of the adversarial system?
it allows both parties to present their case equally, does not promote bias, and protects the rights of individuals and the presumption of innocence.
what are the negatives of the adversarial system?
it encourages prioritising winning rather than discovering the truth, and may result in judgements based on arguments rather than evidence.
what is the adversarial system case study (case citation)?
R v Gittany (2013)
what was the backgroud that led to the R v Gittany (2013) case?
charged with the murder of fiancée, Lisa Cecilia Harnum on 30th July 2011. Harnum fell to her death from their apartment balcony in Sydney. alleged that Gittany lifted Harnum over the balustrade and “unloaded” her, over the edge.
what was the decision of R v Gittany (2013)?
Gittany was found guilty of murder and sentenced to 26 years of imprisonment, with 18 years non-parole