12. IHT - the charge Flashcards
When is IHT charged?
Chargeable transfer (s.1)
- which is a transfer of value (s.2)
- which is a disposition decreasing the value of the transferor’s estate (s.3(1))
Must be gratuitous - s.10
Charge = 20% (and 20% again if die)
BUT MOST lifetime transfer = PET (not charged unless die within 7 years)
On death
deemed transfer of value (s.4)
of all the property deceased was beneficially entitled to immediately before death (s.5)
PETs
no charge straight away
if donor dies –> PET becomes chargeable as a lifetime transfer but at death rates (subject to taper relief)
Asset must become part of donee’s estate or increase value (e.g. paying off bills)
Value of TOV
value by which estate of donor decreases
RATES
0% = BELOW £325,000 40% = amounts above £325,000
(36% if 10% of net value given to charity)
Lifetime: 20% immediately (when above nil rate band, looking back 7 years) and 20% again on death (if 7 years die)
Sch.8A
Transfer of nil rate band
- when spouse B dies, spouse B can use the % of unused nil rate band of Spouse A
- e.g. if Spouse A did not use 80%, B gets 80% of the current nil rate band in addition to B’s own nil rate band
Family home allowance
from 2017-18 (to 2020-21)
- £100,000 p/p
- increasing to £175k in 2020-21
- increase with inflation after 2020-21
- phased out for estates over £2mn
Who is liable to IHT?
PARTIES CAN CHOOSE
if no receipt, Revenue follows legislation
LCT = transferor primarily liability
Additional LCT + PET = transferee
ON DEATH = PR primary liable (s.200)
Revenue Charte for unpaid tax
s.237(1) - charge for unpaid tax
Effect of GWR (s.102 FA 1986)
Property treated as remaining in A’s estate immediatly before death regardless of when gift was made = IHT
worse than PET (if 7 years = no charge)
might be CGT too (unless PPRR)
When does GWR apply?
DISPOSAL by way of gift (narrower than TOV)
& either
ONE - at or before relevant period no BF possession/enjoyment of donee
TWO - during relevant period property not enjoyed at entire exclusion of donor or virtually entire exclusion
RI55
Virtually entire exclusion = ambit is obscure
- might be a de minimise view
ROB applies
- staying weekends
- second home both use
- house w/ lib donor uses
- car which donor uses every day
ROB doesn’t apply
- 2 weeks holiday home alone (or 4 weeks w/donee)
- baby sitting
- social visists
- occasional use of car
- temp short-term stays
- using land to walk dog/horse-riding
Sillars v IRC
GWR
- not enjoyed at virtually entire exclusion because Donee had a share only and had no power (not entire exclusion)
ingram v IRC
Gave donee a freehold already subject to a 20 year lease
- avoided s.102
- not reservation, carved out before giving lease
- in property law, “house” is not a legal entity, only have a right in property which can be altered
s.102A
Now Ingram would fail
- if individual disposes of interest in land
- and enjoys significant right/interest in land
- s.102(3)/(4) applies