1.2 How the constitution has changed since 1997 Flashcards
How did the experience of Conservative governments, from 1979-97, increase the pressure for reform in the 1990s?
- The Conservatives had refused to undertake constitutional reforms
- This had helped to build up pressure for change, especially in Scotland
- Scottish opinion rejected a number of Conservative policies
What were the 5 key areas of reform implemented by new Labour?
House of Lords reforms Electoral reform Devolution The Human Rights Act The creation of the Supreme Court
What reforms were made to the House of Lords by new Labour?
- The right for all but 92 hereditary peers to sit in the House of Lords was ended
- The influence of Labours opponents was reduced as most hereditary peers supported the Conservatives
- This gave the Lords a more ‘modern’ appearance
- Now the majority of its members would be life peers, who were supposed to have been appointed on grounds of merit
- No political party now enjoyed a dominant position in the Lords
- From 2000 a House of Lords Appointments Commission nominated a proportion of peers who weren’t linked with a party
- However, the PM and other party leaders continued to make nominations on party political grounds
What electoral reforms were made by new Labour?
- Various forms of proportional representation were introduced for elections to the Scottish parliament, Welsh Assembly, Northern Ireland Assembly and European Parliament
- However, no changes were made to the Westminster FPTP system
How did new Labour introduce devolution?
- Devolved bodies created for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland following referendums in 1997-98
- These reforms were a pragmatic package designed to damp down support for the SNP and to bring together the conflicting unionist and nationalist factions in Northern Ireland
- The Scottish parliament has always had more powers than the Welsh Assembly due to more demand
Explain the so-called ‘West Lothian question’ and why new Labour had no answer to it.
- It is the anomaly that Scottish MPs at Westminster were able to vote on purely English matters, yet English MPs had no influence over issues devolved to the Scottish parliament
- An attempt to set up elected regional assemblies in England was abandoned after the only area in which a referendum was held to test public opinion
- The North East decisively rejected that idea in 2004
What is the Barnett formula?
- Devised by Labour minister Joel Barnett in 1978, long before devolution
- This determines relative levels of public spending for the component parts of the UK based on population
- Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland receive more spending per head of population than England
What was the Human Rights Act 1998, introduced by new Labour?
- It incorporated the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR) into UK statute law, enshrining rights such as those to a fair trial, freedom from slavery and degrading treatment, and respect for privacy and family life
- All future legislation had to be compatible with the ECHR
- Judges couldn’t strike down laws that were incompatible with it but could highlight such legislation for amendment by parliament
How were the limitations of the Human Rights Act demonstrated?
- By the government’s decision to ‘derogate from’ (declare an exemption from) Article 5, which gave individuals the right to liberty and security, in cases of suspected terrorism
- The introduction of control orders in 2005, which allowed the authorities to limit the freedom of movement of such individuals, highlighted the unentrenched nature of the act
What was the Constitutional Reform Act of 2005, introduced by new Labour?
- Led to the establishment, 4 years later, of a Supreme Court as the highest court of appeal in the UK for civil cases, and except in Scotland for criminal cases
- Previously senior judges known as the law lords, sitting in the House of Lords, had performed this function
- This development is an example of the separation of powers
What were the areas of agreement between the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats in the coalition with regard to constitutional reform?
- Openness to further devolution to Scotland and Wales
- Parliamentary reform - including a wholly or mainly elected House of Lords
What were the largest areas of disagreement within the coalition government?
- House of Lords reform and House of Commons boundary reform
- Electoral reform
- Rights
How did the Conservatives and Lib Dems disagree on House of Lords reform and Commons boundary reform, during the coalition?
- Plans for a mainly elected House of Lords were dropped after a rebellion by 91 backbench Conservative MPs
- The Lib Dems retaliated by blocking the implementation of legislation designed to reduce the number of MPs from 650 to 600 - they halted it because it would have mainly favoured the Conservatives
How did the Conservatives and Lib Dems disagree over electoral reform, during the coalition?
- Referendum held in May 2011, with the two parties taking up entrenched positions: Conservatives wanted to keep FPTP - the Lib Dems wanted to adopt the AV - rejected by 68% of those who voted
How did the Conservatives and Lib Dems disagree over electoral reform, during the coalition?
- A referendum was held in May 2011, with the two parties taking up entrenched positions: the Conservatives campaigned strongly to retain FPTP, while the Lib Dems argued for the adoption of the AV, a preferential, though not proportional, voting system, only to see their proposals rejected by 68% of those who voted
- Change in the voting system had been a Lib Dem manifesto pledge