1.2 Cosmological Argument Flashcards

1
Q

Who initially wrote the cosmological argument and who was it popularised by

A
Aristotle = initial 
Aquinas = popularised
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the basic from of Aquinas’ Cosmological argument

A
  1. Everything that exists has a cause
  2. The universe exists
  3. The universe has a cause
  4. This cause is God
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is Aquinas’ First Way

A

Argument from Motion

“motion” meaning an object changing from one form/state to another

  • Nothing can move itself
  • If every object in motion had a mover, then the first objected in motion needed a mover
  • Movement cant go on for infinity (infinite regress is impossible)
  • Therefore the first mover was God
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is Aquinas’ Second Way

A

Argument from Efficient Cause

Every Object has a cause

No object/thing can cause itself

Infinite regress is impossible

Therefore there must of been an uncaused cause - God

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is Aquinas’ Third Way

A

Everything in the world is contingent (has a beginning and end)

If all beings were contingent then there would’ve been a time where nothing existed

This isn’t possible as all contingent beings have a cause

Therefore not all beings must be contingent

A ‘necessary’ being must exist - this is called God

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Criticisms of Aquinas’ argument

A
  • Argument is circular (if everything has a cause then God does too)
  • Fallacy of composition (Russell)
  • The world could’ve always existed it doesn’t need a cause (Russell)
  • No such thing as a ‘necessary’ being; something is only ‘necessary’ if its self-contradictory to deny (eg. 2+2=4 is necessary) (Russell)

Kant

  • Believes it uses the same logic as the OA
  • God is not logically necessary as the existence of God cant be determined by logic

Hume

  • Explanation of parts is sufficient (eg. baby comes from parents). The whole world doesn’t NEED an explanation
  • Just because we haven’t experienced something rise from nothing doesn’t mean its impossible
  • Why cant the world just be necessary
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly