1000-1500 Medieval England - Anglo-saxon Law Enforcement Flashcards
Who was largely responsible for preventing crime AND catching criminals
The community because there was no official ‘police force’
How did most people live around the year 1000
Most lived in small hamlets, on farms, in villages and a few small towns
What was a benefit of the small, tight-knit communities
Everyone knew everyone & most people had a strong sense of duty to their community - important reason why crime rate was quite low + had an impact on how law was enforced
What were tithings
Shires were split into areas called hundreds, each 1 was divided into 10 tithings. All people in a tithing were responsable for each other - if 1 was accused of a crime the others made sure he went to court OR the tithing has to pay a fine for them.
A shire reeve = a local man appointed by the community to to take criminals to court + make sure any punishment is carried out. He also met regularly with 1 man from each tithing.
What was hue and cry
The victim or witness to a crime raised a hue and cry by shouting alert to others. Anyone who heard it was expected to chase + help catch suspected criminals
What were courts
- If the suspect didn’t admit to the crime or wasn’t caught in the act their guilt/innocnce had to be decided by court.
- different courts for different types of crime committed and the person who committed it
- royal courts were national courts that dealt with the most serious crimes
- lesser crimes were dealt with in shire courts
- petty crimes dealt with in hundred courts
- court hearings (where the punishment the convicted criminal would receive was decided) took place in public
What were oaths
- Swearing oaths before god was a major part of Anglo Saxon justice
- the accused could swear their innocence under oath and others could support them as oath helpers
What were oaths
- Swearing oaths before god was a major part of Anglo Saxon justice
- the accused could swear their innocence under oath and others could support them as oath helpers
how was guilt/innocence decided
- The victim of their family provided evidence of the suspects guilt for the court.
- if the jury couldn’t decide the accused was handed to the church so god could decide a persons guilt/innocence in a trial of ordeal