10 - Ops Planning Flashcards
Lines of Operation
- Traditional military concept used w/in the operational design of military planning
- Per JP 5-0, “A line that defines the interior or exterior orientation of the force in relation to the enemy or that connects actions on nodes and/or decisive points related in time and space to an objective”
DoDIN Operations
- Actions taken to design, build, configure, secure, operate, maintain, and sustain DOD communications systems and networks in a way that creates and preserves data CIA as well as user authentication and non-repudiation
- Threat Agnostic
- Cyberspace Security
DCO
– Descriptions
- CO intended to defend DoD or other friendly cyberspace
- Preserve ability to utilize friendly cyberspace
- Includes outmaneuvering adversaries, or responding to internal/external threats
DCO
– Types
- Internal Defensive Measures
– Actively hunting advanced internal threats w/in DODIN
– Threat Specific
– Cyberspace Defense - DCO Response Actions (DCO-RA)
– Authorized actions external to DODIN in response to ongoing or imminent threats
– Threat Specific
– Cyberspace Exploitation/Attack - Countermeasures
– ID source of a threat and use non-intrusive techniques to stop/mitigate offensive activity
OCO
– Description
- Ops intended to project power by the application of force
- Authorized like physical offensive ops via EXORD
- Requires deconfliction IAW current policies
- Deny, Degrade, Disrupt, Destroy, Manipulate
- Cyberspace Exploitation/Attack
Joint Planning Process
– General
- Deliberate process of determining how to use military capabilities in time and space to achieve objectives while considering associated risks
- IDs ops the POTUS can integrate to achieve national objectives
- Provides options that offer the highest probability for success
- Enables efficient use of limited resources
- orderly, analytical set of logical steps to frame a problem, create/select COAs, and make a plan
- Process steps may be concurrent, truncated, or modified as necessary
Joint Planning Process
– Strategic Level
- Provides POTUS/SECDEF options on the use of military to address national interests and NSS/DSR objectives
Joint Planning Process
– Operational Level
- Ties training, mobilization, deployment, etc. of joint forces to military objectives contributing to national security objectives/national interests
Joint Planning Process
– Steps
- Planning Initiation
- Mission Analysis
- COA Development
- COA Analysis and Wargaming
- COA Comparison
- COA Approval
- Plan or Order Development
Planning Initiation (JPP)
– Begins how?
- Begins in two ways:
– appropriate authority sees potential for military action ISO national objectives or a potential/actual crisis
– POTUS, SECDEF, or CJCS directs military planning in response to operational environment or developing/immediate crisis
Mission Analysis (JPP)
– Begins when?
– Determines (6)
- Starts when CC receives mission tasking
- Must determine:
– Forces/assets needed to support the op
– Tasks required for mission accomplishment
– Will mission achieve desired results
– Purpose of mission
– Limitations on actions
– How to know when mission is accomplished successfully
Mission Analysis (JPP)
– Key Components (5)
- Constraints
– “Must do”; action dictated by higher command - Restraints
– “Cannot do”; action prohibited by higher command - Facts
– Information known to be true - Assumptions
– Supposition about current situation/future events; presumed true - Mission Statement
– Who, what, when, where, and why of a mission
COA
– Description
– Describes (4):
- Potential way to accomplish assigned mission
- Multiple COAs provide options to CC
- Should accomplish mission w/in CCs guidance, provide flexibility, and position forces for future ops
- Describes:
– Actions throughout campaign/op
– Size of forces necessary
– Time in which capabilities must be brought to bear
– Risks associated
COA
– Components (10)
- Available forces
- Organizations/Units
- Objectives
- Key tasks and purpose
- Timeline
- Sustainment concept
- Operational Environment
- Synchronization efforts
- Main and supporting efforts
- Risk
COA
– Test Criteria (5)
- Adequate
- Feasible
- Acceptable
- Distinguishable
- Complete
Adequate (COA test)
- Can accomplish the mission w/in CC’s guidance
- Asks:
– Does it accomplish the mission?
– Does it meet the CC’s intent?
– Does it accomplish all the essential tasks?
– Does it meet the conditions for the end state?
Feasible (COA test)
- Can accomplish the mission w/in the established time, space, and resource limitations
Acceptable (COA test)
- Must balance cost/risk with advantage gained
Distinguishable (COA Test)
- Must be sufficiently different from other COAs:
– Focus or direction of main effort
– Scheme of maneuver
– Sequential vs simultaneous maneuvers
– Primary mechanism for mission accomplishment
– Task organization
Complete (COA Test)
- Does it answer who, what, where, when, how, and why?
- Incorporates:
– Objectives, desired effects, tasks
– Major forces required
– Concepts for deployment, employment, sustainment
– Time estimates for achieving objectives
– Military end state and mission success criteria
COA Analysis and Wargaming (JPP)
Analysis
- Closely examining potential COAs to ID COAs that are valid and ID pros/cons of each
- CC and staff analyze each COA separately
- Should reaffirm validity and determine feasibility and acceptability
Wargaming
- Representation of conflict in synthetic environment
- Allows CC, staff, and sub CCs/staff to gain common understanding of friendly/enemy COAs/actions that may work in opposition to achieving objectives/end state conditions
COA Comparison (JPP)
– Description
- Subjective process whereby COAs are independently evaluated against CC’s criteria
- Facilitates CC’s decision-making process by balancing ends, means, ways, and risk
- Helps CC determine:
– Differences
– Pros/cons
– Risks
COA Comparison (JPP)
– Key Input
– Key Output
- Key Inputs
– Advantages and disadvantages
– Wargaming results
– Evaluation criteria
– Revised staff estimates - Key Outputs
– Evaluated COAs
– Recommended COA
– COA selection rationale
– Revised staff estimates
– Refined CC’s critical information requirements
– Synchronized matrices
COA Approval (JPP)
– Description
- Staff determines preferred COA to recommend to CC
- Staff briefs CC on comparison, analysis, and wargaming results
– Brief should include supporting info used in COA development
COA Approval (JPP)
– CC Options
- Concur w/ recommendation
- Concur, w/ modifications
- Select a different COA
- Combine COAs
- Reject all and start over
- Defer decision and consult w/ staff/CCs prior to deciding
Plan or Order Development (JPP)
- Concept of Operations (CONOPS) - clearly and concisely expresses what CC intends to accomplish and how
– Describes how actions of joint force components/supporting orgs will be integrated, including plan branches and sequels
Deliberate Planning
- Planning developed in non-crisis situations ISO future events
- Create several COAs, each containing CONOPS w/ minimum of:
– Major capabilities required
– Task organization
– Tasks accomplished by components
– Concept of employment
– Assessment of risk - Planning has >=6 months
Crisis Action Planning
-
Driven by an incident/situation
– Typically develops rapidly and occurs w/ little/no warning - Activities/functions may occur simultaneously
- First directive may be DEPORD or EXORD if crisis is very time critical or COA is very obvious
- Planning has <6 months
Special Access Program (SAP)
- Established and maintained when absolutely necessary to protect the most sensitive DoD capabilities, information, technologies, and operations or when required by statute
Acknowledged SAP
- Affirmed, or made known to others, but its details are classified
Unacknowledged SAP
- Protective controls ensuring the existence of the program is not acknowledged, affirmed, or made known to any unauthorized person
Acquisition SAP
- Protects sensitive research, development, testing, evaluation, modification, or procurement activities
Apportioned SAP
- Formally included in the IJSTO process for CC
Intelligence SAP
- Protect planning and execution of sensitive intel or CI ops
Operations and Support SAP
- Protect the planning for, execution of, and support to especially sensitive military ops
Waived SAP
- SECDEF has waived applicable reporting
- Even more restrictive reporting and access
- Adverse effect to national security
DoD Special Access Program Central Office (DoD SAPCO)
- Execute, manage, administer, oversee, and maintain SAP records
- Develop and implement policies and procedures for oversight, execution, security, IA, and records for their SAP
- Forwards request of approval for action related to SAP to SecDef/Deputy SecDef
Integrated Joint Special Technical Operations (IJSTO)
- Overarching formal process and management of SAPs
- Oversight Authority (OA) can endorse apportionment into or de-apportionment out of IJSTO
- While in IJSTO, must be reported in SAP annual report to congress
- Must provide justification when a capabilitiy in IJSTO is no longer available (why, or that it was deemed no longer requiring SAP security protections)
SecDef
- Principal assistant to the President in all DoD matters
- Authority for all functions in DoD and component agencies (Joint Chiefs of Staff, CJCS, Joint Staff, Mil Departments)
Combatant (unified) Commands
– Description
- Established to perform military missions
- Established by POTUS, through SecDef, w/ advice from CJCS
- Perform broad continuing mission under a single commander
Geographic Combatant Commands
– List
- USAFRICOM
- USCENTCOM
- USEUCOM
- USNORTHCOM
- USSOUTHCOM
- USINDOPACOM
USAFRICOM
- Military relations w/ African nations, African Union, and African regional security orgs
- Protects/defends U.S./interests by strengthening African nations
- Increase security while deterring/defeating transnational threats
USCENTCOM
- Ops in 20 countries in the “central” area of the globe
- Utilize national/international partnerships to build cooperation among nations, respond to crisis, deter/defeat threats, and support development to increase stability
USEUCOM
- Works w/ NATO
- Operates in Europe, parts of Middle East and Eurasia
- Coordinates cooperative solutions in peace and wartime
- Coordinates training missions
- Provides humanitarian assistance
- Develops strategies to promote peace/stability in the region
USNORTHCOM
- U.S., Alaska, Mexico, Canada, portions of Caribbean and surrounding waters
- Civil support and homeland security
- Oversees NORAD
- Few permanent forces; assigned forces by SecDef or POTUS as needed
USSOUTHCOM
- Central America, South America, and Caribbean
- Contingency planning, ops, and security cooperation
- Force protection of U.S. military resources
- Ensures defense of Panama Canal
- Joint command > 1200 mil/civilian personnel from all branches + fed agencies
USINDOPACOM
- AOR from U.S. west coast to western border of India, and from Antarctica to North Pole (36 nations)
- Promote development of the region
- Enhance security, deter aggression, respond w/ force (when necessary), provide humanitarian assistance
Functional Combatant Commands
– List
- USSOCOM
- USSTRATCOM
- USTRANSCOM
- USCYBERCOM
USSOCOM
- Plans and conducts special operations
- Short duration strikes and small-scale offensives
- Special reconnaissance
- Unconventional warfare
- Foreign internal defense
- Civil affairs operations
- Counterterrorism
- Psychological Operations
- Information Operations
- Counter-proliferation of WMD
- Security force assistance
- Counterinsurgency
- Specific activities directed by POTUS/SECDEF
USSTRATCOM
- Conducts global operations to deter and detect strategic attacks against the U.S.
- Commands U.S. nuclear capabilities, space ops, global surveillance/recon, intel, communications, computers, global missile defense, and combatting WMDs
USTRANSCOM
- Provides DoD w/ an aggregate of transportation capabilities and assets
- Enables diverse array of joint mobility missions
USCYBERCOM
- Directs ops and defense of DoD information networks
- Prepare to/conduct cyberspace ops to enable actions in all domains
- Ensure US/allied freedom of action in cyberspace, and deny the same to adversaries
- Centralize command of cyber ops, strengthen cyber capes, and integrate cyber expertise
Subordinate Unified Command
- Authorized by SecDef, through CJCS
- Geographical or functional
- CC’s of subordinate unified commands have similar responsibilities/missions to component CCs w/in a unified CCMD
Cyber Support Element (CSE)
- Organized from USCYBERCOM forces deployed to other CCMDs
- Facilitate development of cyber reqs
- Coordinate, integrate, and deconflict CO in the CC’s planning process
- Provide CCMDs an interface/reachback capability to USCYBERCOM
- Submit target development nominations to the supported CCMD
Combatant Command (COCOM, authority)
- Cannot be delegated
- Vested only in CCs of CCMDs by Title 10, USC, Section 164
- Authoritative direction over
all aspects of military ops, joint training, and logistics - Authority to organize/employ commands and forces, assign tasks, and designate objectives
Operational Control (OPCON)
- May be delegated
- Authority for all operational aspects
- Does not include logistics, admin discipline, internal organization, or unit training
Tactical Control (TACON)
- May be delegated
- Authority to give direction for military operations and the control of designated forces
Support (authority)
- Command authority
- Established by a common superior CC between subordinate CCs when one organization should aid, protect, complement, or sustain another
- May be exercised at any command level
- Conveys priorities to CCs/staff that are planning/executing joint ops
Warfare
- Mechanism, method, or modality of armed conflict against an enemy
Traditional Warfare
- Characterized as a violent struggle for domination between nation-states or coalitions and alliances of nation-states
Irregular Warfare
- Characterized as a violent struggle among state and non-state actors for legitimacy and influence over the relevant populations
Levels of Warfare
– Description
- Helps commanders visualize a logical arrangement of operations, allocate resources, and assign tasks to appropriate commands
Strategic (Level of Warfare)
- Idea(s) for employing the instruments of national power in a synchronized and integrated fashion to achieve theater and multinational objectives
- National guidance addresses strategic objectives ISO strategic end states
Operational (Level of Warfare)
- Links strategy to tactics by establishing operational objectives needed to achieve military end states/strategic objectives
- Focused on planning and execution using operational art
Operational Art
- Cognitive approach by CCs and staff–supported by their skill, knowledge, experience, creativity, and judgement–to develop strategies, campaigns, and ops to organize and employ military forces
Tactical (Level of Warfare)
- Employment and ordered arrangement of forces in relation to each other
- Battles and engagements are planned and executed to achieve mil objectives
- Forces generally employ various tactics to achieve objectives
Institutional (Level of Warfare)
- Nation’s miliary services develop material and non-material capabilities, to include technology and people, to execute the other levels of warfare
TTPs
- Fundamental building blocks of military activity
- Actions that generate effects
- Tactical actions are the component pieces of operations
Campagin
- Series of related major operations aimed at achieving strategic and operational objectives within a given time/space
- Appropriate when contemplated military ops exceed the scope of a single major op
- Often the most expensive joint ops in terms of time and other resources