10) Cognitive Therapy: Techniques and applications Flashcards

1
Q

What does CT look like across sessions? Describe what happens at each stage (4; 4; 3)

A

Early stages
* First 1-3 sessions
* Cognitive assessment: identify thoughts, beliefs, assumptions and how it leads to development and maintenance of behaviours
* Techniques: psychoeducation
* Develop a collaborative relationship

Middle stages
* Bulk of sessions (e.g., 50-70%)
* Intervention: effecting change
* Cognitive restructing of ATs, assumptions, sometimes core belief
* Techniques: Socratic dialogue + variety of other techniques

Late stages
* Consolidating change and relapse prevention
* Cognitive restructuring: tell clients how core beliefs can maintain and increase relapse
* Establish supports/early intervention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the structure of a typical CT session? (6)

A
  • Check in: sometimes something happens during the week etc.
    o Quick
  • Agenda setting
    o Quick
  • Review/Discussion of learning tasks (HW)
    o Extended
  • Cognitive restructuring
    o Extended
  • Setting new learning tasks (HW)
    o Intermediate
  • Closure
    o Quick
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the 3 key components in cognitive restructuring? (3)

A
  • Identifying automatic thoughts and their effects
  • Identifying and facilitating change of thinking biases
  • Identifying and facilitating change of assumptions & core beliefs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

List some methods of identifying automatic thoughts and thinking biases:
* Within session (5)
* Outside of session (2)
* More generally (2)

A

Within session
* Listening skills - clients offer rich information during their descriptions (e.g., during CBA)
* Recall of HOT (high affect) thoughts a/w frustrating, depressing, anxiety-generating events o Imagery of problem situations e.g., imaginal desensitisation
* Role play interpersonal situations that provoke negative affect (challenging social situation in SAD, discussion of binge in BN)
* Self-monitoring diaries (thought records)
* Provoke experiences e.g., ask client to touch the carpet (scared of contamination)
 Automatic thoughts can flood through

Outside of sessions
* Behavioural experiments
* Self-monitoring diaries (thought records)
 Especially important for depression – slowed down psychic activity so often not a lot of thoughts during sessions. Thought records for homework can elicit more thoughts to discuss at the next session

More generally
* Use of metaphors and analogies
* Visual methods – pictures
 E.g., doing therapy: minefield vs. sailing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How do we go about appraising automatic thoughts? (8)

A
  • Be clear about the objective
    o Assessment vs. education vs. intervention – enhancing alliance vs intervention – reappraisal
  • Assessment: identify and label
  • Education
    o Link ATs to negative feelings
    o Explore thinking biases/beliefs that may underlie these self-statements
    o Identify subsequent coping and consequences
  • Enhancing alliance
    o Acknowledge distress, other listening skills
    o Explore impact, validate, stay with experience
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How do we go about re-appraising ATs and thinking biases? (3)

A
  • use thought records
  • explore motivation to change these
  • Facilitate change through one or more strategies of cognitive restructuring including the identification of alternative (functional) thinking patterns
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

List some strategies for identifying conditional assumptions and core beliefs. (3)

A
  • Downward arrow technique
  • Identify common themes associated with client distress or intense affects
    o problem situations
    o painful memories
  • Identify biases in thinking/unhelpful attributional styles often reflect/couch schemas
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Identify and describe the 4 stages within cognitive restructuring (4; 3; 3; 3)

A

1) Prep
* Understanding client’s belief structures
* Overcoming resistance: validation responses
* Highlighting need for change (a la motivational interviewing)
* Identifying NATs, thinking biases, beliefs

2) Prep
* Select beliefs amenable to change (manuals may help)
* Building a case for change (e.g., gathering evidence that supports a reappraisal)
* Select one or more CT techniques worth trialling

3) Effect change
* Socratic questions directed at the specific assumption/belief targeted for change
* Allow time for emotional processing
* Review effects, If necessary, change approach/technique/method

4) Consolidate change
* If effective, use techniques to consolidate change
* Use multiple approaches and methods that converge on same belief
* Tailor technique to what is most effective for client

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Identify Padesky’s 4 components of Socratic Dialogue

A
  • Ask informational questions
  • Listening
  • Summarising (regularly)
  • Ask synthesising and analytical questions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Outline how Padesky’s 4-component Socratic Dialogue can be mapped onto a cognitive restructuring template

A
  • SD Informational questions (Stage 1 & 2 of CR - prep)
  • SD Empathic Listening (Stage 1 and 2 of CR - prep)
  • SD Summarising responses (Stage 1 and 2 of CR - prep)
  • SD Synthesising questions: (Stage 3 of CR - effecting change)

Further steps (Stage 4 of CR - consolidate change)
* Series of Socratic questions that converge on a specific belief
* Focus on review, re-appraise and re-write beliefs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Identify some methods to reappraise/change assumptions and core belief. (5)

A
  • Socratic dialogue in therapy situation
  • Role-play and post-reflection/discussion
    o E.g., dating - Self and significant other
    o Different aspects of oneself (child-adult; emotion- reason)
  • Imagery, analysis, and discussion
  • Behavioural experiments
  • Learning/discovery tasks (HW) directed at cognitive restructuring
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

List some CT techniques from Leahy. (10)

A
  • Eliciting thoughts
  • evaluating and testing thoughts
  • evaluating assumptions and rules
  • examining information-processing and logical errors
  • modifying decision making
  • responding to and evaluating intrusive thoughts
  • modifying worry and rumination
  • putting things in perspective
  • identifying and modifying schemas
  • emtoional regulation techniques
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are some CT techniques? (7)

A
  • Reviewing and testing the evidence
  • Cost-benefit or Pros-Cons analyses
  • Thought records
    o Identifying NATs, biases, assumptions, beliefs
    o Alternative explanations
    o Developing new perspectives
    o Re-scripting beliefs
  • Downward arrow (vertical descent)
  • Reviewing and testing probability estimations
  • Step-wise approach to “unmanageable” problems - breaking it down
  • Behavioural experiments
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Why would you use downward arrow technique in…
Assessment?
Therapy?

A
  • Assessment: To identify the hierarchical structure of beliefs, thoughts, intermediate beliefs, core beliefs
  • Therapy: To make client aware of a belief that underpins distress maintains NAT
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are some potential responses to use when utilising the downward arrow technique? (5)

A
  • What if that were true/the case?
  • If that were true what would that mean?
  • If that were the case, why should it bother you?
  • And,…what would be so bad about that?
  • If that were the case, what would it say about you/others/your past/your future?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What do you need to take into consideration when utilising the downward arrow technique? (4)

A
  • When you get close to the core beliefs, make sure you don’t sound disparaging
     Validation response
     Apologise for asking upsetting questions
     …prefix…Just so I understand you better,…
  • Bail out of downward arrow in time
     When you arrive at the core belief
     When you arrive at the belief you want re-appraised.
17
Q

Outline and describe the 4 categories of CT competence (3; 2; 4; 3)

A

Attitudes (novice) - listed expert to novice
* Towards learning and discovery
 Collaborative empiricism
* Patience with self and client
 Change does not happen overnight

Knowledge (expert) - listed expert to novice
* CT principles – theory and procedures
* Repertoire of techniques and methods
* Conceptualise client’s response (including ambivalence, distrust) in CT terms

Technical skills (4) - listed expert to novice
* Promote active, collaborative engagement and empiricism
* SOCRATIC DIALOGUE
* Other CT skills
* Integrations skills (including timing and fluency)

Relational skills (3) - listed expert to novice
* Empathy skills
* Be sensitive to and pick out client ambivalence/resistance
* Relationship awareness of what works for client (tailoring techniques and methods to client)

18
Q

Define schemas

A

deeply ingrained habitual patterns of thinking and responding. They are often equated with core beliefs.

19
Q

What do depression schemas reflect (4)

A

failure, loss, rejection, depletion

20
Q

What do anxiety schemas reflect? (2)

A

threat, injury

21
Q

What do anger schemas reflect (2)

A

humiliation, domination

22
Q

What do personality disorder schemas reflect?

A

schemas are typical of each PD

23
Q

How can we test predictions of core beliefs?

A

behavioural experiments

24
Q

list methods to reappraise core beliefs (6)

A
  • schema work (in schema therapy)
  • behavioural experiments
  • reviewing and rescripting exercises (e.g., in thought records)
  • developing caveats/continuum charts
  • historical tests of core beliefs
  • researching and recording evidence that supports alternative belief structure
25
Q

what are some Qs to ask to help find evidence that does not support a hot thought?

A
  • have I had any experience that show that this thought is not completely true all the time?
  • If my best friend or someone I loved had this thought, what would I tell them?
  • If my best friend or someone who loves me knew I was thinking this thought, what would they say to me? What evidence would they point out to me that would suggest that my thoughts were not 100% true?
  • When I am not feeling this way, do I think about this type of situation any differently? How?
  • When I have felt this way in the past, what did I think about that helped me feel better?
  • Have I been in this situation before? What happened? is there anything different between this situation and previous ones? What have I learnt from prior experiences that could help me now? Are there any small things that contradict my thoughts that I might be discounting as not important?
  • Five years from now, if I look back at this situation, will I look at it any differently? Will I focus on any different part of my experience?
  • Are there any strengths or positives in me or the situation that I am ignoring?
  • Am I jumping to any conclusions that are not completely justified by the evidence?
  • Am I blaming myself for something over which I do no have complete control?
26
Q

List some questions that can facilitate reappraisal of unhelpful assumptions

A
  • Is the assumption reasonable/fair/balanced?
    o what is the evidence?
    o in what way does it fail to reflect the reality of human experience?
    o would this be an assumption that the client would like to impart to others/one’s children?
  • In what way is the assumption unhelpful?
    o advantages and disadvantages of maintaining these beliefs/assumptions?
    o cost in terms of goals, personal distress, thriving?
  • Is your appraisal of these events balanced/fair/reasonable?
  • Are you thinking in all or nothing terms?
  • Are you being too hard/critical on/of yourself?
  • Making unfair conclusions on the basis of a single event? [overgeneralising]
  • Might you be amplifying your weaknesses and disregarding your strengths?
  • Are you taking things personally/taking more than your fair share of responsibility for the event?
  • Are you applying rigid/perfectionistic/unrealistic standards in judging yourself?
  • Might you be using a double standard – one for yourself and another for others?
  • Are you over-estimating the chances of a negative event/disaster?
  • Are you exaggerating the importance of negative events?
  • Are you assuming that nothing will/you can do nothing to change this situation?
  • Are you predicting the future instead of working/coping with/trying to change the present?