10 - Character Evidence Flashcards

1
Q

Character Evidence

A
  • Notion of propensity or disposition proof
  • 404(a) governs the circumstantial use of character evidence - the admissibility of evidence of a character trait to prove that a person acted in accordance with that trait on a particular occasion.
  • Generally inadmissible 404(a) (accused character) and (b) (victim’s character)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Exceptions allowing character evidence

A
  1. A crim D’s character AND
  2. A victim’s character in self-defense cases when offered by the accused
  3. A witness’s character is limited to impeachment (ie character for untruthfulness).
  • Rape Shield law - limit’s use of victim’s character in sex offenses
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

3 Methods of Proof 405(a)

with a rule 404(a) exception

A
  1. Reputation
  2. Opinion
  3. Specific acts

ex. to determine somebody’s honest character at law school, could ask
1. about that person’s reputation for honesty
2. ask someone who knows that person well (opinion)
3. ask about that person’s conduct - e.g., person found a wallet filled with money and returned it to the owner

because of SPECIFIC ACTS -> people form OPINIONS -> and collective opinions become REPUTATION

  • specific acts may be most proactive, but takes most time and carries potential for distraction (party could contest specific act -> counter proof -> trial within a trial)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Character in issue - 2nd use of character evidence

A
  • Rare instances where character is an element in cause of action, crime, or defense
  • specific instances of conduct may be used o establish character
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Other-acts evidence 404(b)

A

Provides that evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts, although not admissible to prove character, may be admissible for some other purpose, such as proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Habit evidence 406

A
  • Generally admissible
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q
Reputation Evidence (method of proving character)
- Foundational Requirements
A

a method of proving character

  • witness’s qualifications to testify about a person’s reputation in the community i.e. where they live, work, go to school
  • Reputation is known at time of charged offense not trial
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Opinion Evidence

- Foundational Requirements

A
  • Person who is sufficiently acquainted with the accused or victim, may give a personal opinion about that person’s character
  • show that the witness is sufficiently acquainted with the accused or victim to have formed an opinion about that person’s character
  • Fed courts divided on expert testimony (psychiatrist)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Specific instances reflecting character

A
  • ex. evidence that a person returned lost money on previous occasion would be relevant in ascertaining that person’s character for honesty
  • Strongest evidence, but prohibited by 405(a) when character is admitted under 404(a)(1) or (2)
  • can be raised on cross-examination
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Accused character (crim) 404(a)(2)(A)

Limitations (3)

A
  • accused may offer evidence of a pertinent trait of their character BUT after opening the door, prosecutor may cross -examine the defenses’ character witness on the issue and offer rebuttal character evidence
  1. D’s character only at the time of the charged offense is relevant
  2. 405(a) limits the method by which the accused may introduce character evidence (only opinion and reputation NOT specific instances)
  3. In sex offenses cases, special provisions 412-15
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Personal history

A
  • Defense can bring forth positive character evidence during examination of accused or defense witness but this triggers the prosecution’s right to rebut
    • Prosecution cannot insinuate the subject into evidence on cross-examinaiton and then attempt to rebut
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Exception to 404(a)(2) - Pertinent Trait

A
  • Accused can introduce evidence of a pertinent triat of character (relevant tot eh crimes charged e.g. peaceful in crimes of violence; honest for theft; and trutherful for perjury
  • Fed cases also allow “law-abiding” character BUT into of this is double-edged sword
  • Pros rebuttal evidence for character trait of honesty is limited to dishonesty (evidence for violence is not relevant as rebuttal)
  • Pros can rebut with evidence of unlawful conduct like convictions only if defense introduced law-abiding evidence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Form of questions for witnesses

A
  • “Have you heard” - cross-examination of reputation witness

- “Did you know” - opinion witness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Accused’s Character in Sex Offense Cases (413-15) - SEXUAL ASSAULT

A

413 - if accused of sexual assault case, this rule allows the introduction evidence of other sexual assaults - PROPENSITY evidence is admissible and not just limited to that kind of evidence (any that is relevant)
- method: can use opinion, reputation, and specific instances (don’t need to result in conviction)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Accused’s Character in Sex Offense Cases (413-15) - CHILD-MOLESTATION

A
  • victim must be under 14 (414)

- 414 eliminates 413 requirement that the alleged sexual contact has occurred without consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Accused’s Character in Sex Offense Cases (413-15) - CIVIL SUITS

A
  • 415 addressses admiss of accussed other sex offenses in civil cases
  • johnson v. Elk Lake School - court upheld exclusion of evidence
17
Q

Victim’s Character in Self-Defense Cases 404(a)(2)(B) only in crim

A
  • only allowed in homicide and assault
  • pros can’t intro evidence of victim’s character until defense opens the door

First aggressor issue - D may intro evi of victim’s violent character (pertinent trait) to show they were the first aggressor - estab 1 element of self defense
- after ev of vic’s charc intro by accused, pros can rebut for ex peacefulness AND with ev of accused’s ex violent character

18
Q

Special Homicide rule

A
  • Any evidence that victim was first aggressor in homicide triggers the prosecution’s right to introduce rebuttal evidence of victim’s peaceful character
    ex. if accused testifies of victim being first aggressor but doesn’t intro character evidence - prosecution may introduce evidence of peaceful
19
Q

Rape Shield Law 412
________________
3 Exceptions

A
  • Trumps 404(a) crim and civil
  • excludes evidence of the victims other sexual behavior or sexual disposition
    __________________
    1. Source of Semen, Pregnancy, or Disease - 412(b)(1)(A) - excepts evidence of specific instances of the alleged vitim’s sexual behavior when offered to show that another person was the source of the semen, injury, or other physical evidence (pregnancy or disease)
    2. Past Sexual Activity with Accused - 412(b)(1)(B) - excepts evidence of specific instances of sexual behavior involving the accused and the alleged victim. When offered by accused, this exception is limited to the issue of consent
    3. Constitutionally-required - examples: shield laws that exclude evidence have been found to violate 6th amend rights, to show motive (also related to procedure and sanctions violating con rights)
    4. Civil cases ex. harassment - reverse Rule 403 - must substantially outweigh danger of harm to victim/unfair prejudice
20
Q

Character as Element of a Cause of Action or Defense

A
  • If character is element of a crime, action, or affirm defense, prohibition of 404(a) does not apply and char must be proved
    • Can prove with specific instances/acts 405(b)
  • Character in issue evidence is rare
    • ex - negligent entrustment - entrusting incompetent (character trait) is an element of the cause of action
    • ex - defemation - if p sues d for def because d called p a “liar,” d can raise “truth” as a defense - so character for truthfulness is an element of the defense and requires proof