10 - Accountant Liability Flashcards
Can a clients records be provided to a buyer of an accountant’s practice?
Yes - if they get permission from the client
Who owns the work papers during an engagement
The accountant does
IS a CPA liable to unknown third party users of your audited F/S
NO - in general is you make a mistake through negligence ( I didn’t do a good job but not on purpose)
Then you are NOT liable to unknown users
CPA Is LIABLE to anyone the KNOW will rely on the opinion
What is the Ultramares Act
This basically says that a CPA’s liability is limited to those party with one you have privity .
Privity is when you have a relationship between parties that is recognized by the law
What is privity
Privity is when you have a relationship between parties that is recognized by the law
If you are found negligent - who is A CPA liable to
They are liable to the client AND third party users who are known to be relying on the opinion
If the CPA Is accused of negligence - what defense can they prove
- That the negligence the CPA committed was NOT the case of the losses
So - yes there was negligence by the CPA caused by a breach of duty of care (I made a mistake, but didnt due it intentionally)
but the negligence wasn’t the cause of the loss
What if the client is partly to blame for the error
contributorily negligent
It will reduce the CPA’s liability, but does not negate the CPA’s liability
What is a required element in common law fraud - example
The INTENT to deceive is required.
If you audited F/S for a co. going for a loan that later declared bankruptcy and were sued by the bank - you can defend yourself by saying that you did not intent to deceive
What is common law fraud based on
It is the INTENT to deceive
The disclaimer provision in an engagement letter protects a CPA from what
It protect the CPA from liability due to fraud committed by company that hired the CPA To do the audit
What is the 1933 Act - what are violations
This is outlines what information a company must submit to the SEC as part of an IPO
A CPA being sued here would be when they included materially misstated F/S in the prospectus
The CPA is considered GUILTY until he proves these:
- the investor KNEW about the errors and therefore did not RELY on the F/S
- The CPA did their due diligence and therefore are NOT guilty
Under what act does a plaintiff NOT have to prove reliance
Section 11 - Securities Act of 1933.
When does a plaintiff HAVE to prove reliance
- 10b 5 1934 ACT
- Gross Negligence / Fraud ( with intention you made the mistake)
Does a CPA have to turn over their work papers to the client
NO - they are the property of the CPA
Under 1933 Act - what does the plaintiff have to prove
- they suffered a loss and
- the prospects F/S were materially misstated
What are your best two defenses if you are sued for Common Law negligence ( I made a misstake because I didn’t do a good job)
Best defenses:
- the plaintiff lacks privity ( there is no legally recognized relationship between CPA and suing party)
- The CPA actually adhered to GAAS during the audit
What is negligence
This is the absence of due professional care
If you discover an error - what shock you do first
tell the client about the error and suggest a course of action
CAN the IRS make you give them a clients info
Only if they have a court order
What if you think there needs to be disclosures in the F/S to be in accordance with GAAP but the client refuses
the F/S are the representation of management - so you might need to withdraw from the engagement
Under Ultramares who can hold an accountant liable
- only those with Privy
What is a party that an audio could have reasonable foreseen called
forseeable
What must you prove as the plaintiff in the 1934
- It was intentional
- it was a material misstatement
- The info was YES relied on
- there was interstate commerce - because it s federal law
- there was a loss
- gross error or fraud sienna
What is scienter
Fraud
Under the 1933 act what must a plaintiff prove - 3 things
- a loss was suffered
- the audited F/S were included in eh prospectus
- material misstatements or omissions were contained
If you are guilty of gross negligence ( intention misstatements) who can sue
anyone - foreseen or unforeseen