1. Validity of wills and intestacy Flashcards
What types of property passes outside the will or intestacy rules?
- Joint property
- Insurance policies put in trust for the benefit of specific individuals
- Pension benefits
- Trust property
What are the 3 requirements for a valid will?
- Capacity
- Intention
- Formalities
What is the test for mental capacity from Banks v Goodfellow?
Soundness of mind, memory and understanding
- Understand their act and that it will have the effect of carrying out his wishes on death
- Understand extent of their property (not necessarily every item)
- Recall those who have claims on him and understand the nature of those claims so that he can both include and exclude beneficiaries from the will
ALSO Not suffering any disorder of the mind
What is the golden rule from Kenward v Adams regarding capacity?
No capacity means there is a void will
What is the exception regarding capacity from Parker v Felgate?
A will can be valid if testator has capacity when they give instruction for their will, even if capacity is lost by the time the will is executed (if instructions for will is given to solicitor)
What is the burden of proof regarding capacity, and what underlies this?
Person asserting the validity of the will must prove it
However, presumption of capacity underlies this so therefore capacity is assumed if the will is rational on its face and the testator showed no evidence of mental confusion
What is the general rule regarding intention?
Testator must have intended to make the will AND must intend that specific will
What is the relevant presumption regarding intention?
If the testator has capacity, there is a presumption of knowledge and approval of the will
When is the presumption of knowledge and approval of the will if the testator has capacity not relevant?
- Testator is blind/ illiterate/ not signing personally
- There are suspicious circumstances
Where a testator appears to have known and approved the contents of the will, what must someone challenging the will prove?
Prove one or more of either:
1. Force or fear - through actual or threatened injury
2. Fraud - after being misled by some pretence
3. Undue influence - where testator’s freedom of choice was overcome by intolerable pressure, but their judgement remained unconvinced
4. Mistake - presumption of knowledge or approval does not apply if all or part of the will was included by mistake
For undue influence, what is the starting presumption and what is the applicable test?
There is no starting presumption
The challenger must prove coercion rather than persuasion
What happens if the challenger fails to prove their claim of undue influence?
They will be penalised in costs
What are the s 9 formality requirements for a valid will?
- In writing and signed by testator, or person in presence by their direction
- Signature intended to give effect
- 2 or more witnesses (both present at time of signing by testator)
- Each witness either
- Attests and sign the will; or
- Acknowledge their signature, in the presence of the testators, but not necessarily in the presence of any other witness
When does the presumption of due execution arise?
If the will includes an attestation clause
If the will does not include an attestation clause, how can due execution be proved?
By an affidavit of due execution from a witness or another person present