1 Social influence Flashcards
Types of conformity
internalisation, identification and compliance
Explanations for conformity
informational social influence and normative social influence
Variables affecting conformity
- group size, unanimity and task difficulty as investigated by Asch but there’s an upper limit where adding more members doesn’t increase conformity (up to 7 in asch)
- presence of at least one other non-conformist conformity rates drop to near zero
Internalisation
- when individual changes behaviour to fit in with group
publicly while also agreeing with them privately - strongest form bc group’s beliefs becomes part of
individual’s belief system
Identification
conforms to demands of a social role in society e.g. Zimbardo (1971) Stanford prison experiment
Compliance
- someone votes differently publicly to when they vote
privately - going along with a demand in public while privately
disagreeing with group’s behaviour - change in people’s expresses views is temporary
- Asch’s studies showed participants would comply in public and answer questions correctly but privately disagree
The Asch Effect
is the influence of the group’s majority view on an individual’s judgment.
confederates
- each group of participants had only one true, naive subject that believes the confederates are uniformed participants like them
- in asch’s study, in confederates identified a line segment obviously shorter than the target line - wrong answer
participant’s choice
75% of participants conformed to group pressure at least once by choosing incorrect line because of group’s views
other factors that influence conformity
- public/private nature of responses: more likely to conform in public and vice versa
- task difficulty
cons
artificial situation- has low ecological validity
deception- real participants don’t know other participants were confederates
pros
laboratory setting ensured variables were strictly controlled meaning:
- can be repeated easily
- influence of extraneous variables can be minimised
confidence in Asch’s study
- A found participants that didn’t conform displayed confidence, participants who had confidence in their answer did not succumb to the groups pressure
- as easily
confidence in other studies 1
Perrin and Spencer (1980)
- carried out same A experiment, conformity rates not as high bc did it with engineering students perhaps because engineers were more confident in decision making
confidence in other studies 2
Wiensenthal et al.(1976)
- observed participants confident in ability to complete task less likely to conform