1 Social influence Flashcards
Types of conformity
internalisation, identification and compliance
Explanations for conformity
informational social influence and normative social influence
Variables affecting conformity
- group size, unanimity and task difficulty as investigated by Asch but there’s an upper limit where adding more members doesn’t increase conformity (up to 7 in asch)
- presence of at least one other non-conformist conformity rates drop to near zero
Internalisation
- when individual changes behaviour to fit in with group
publicly while also agreeing with them privately - strongest form bc group’s beliefs becomes part of
individual’s belief system
Identification
conforms to demands of a social role in society e.g. Zimbardo (1971) Stanford prison experiment
Compliance
- someone votes differently publicly to when they vote
privately - going along with a demand in public while privately
disagreeing with group’s behaviour - change in people’s expresses views is temporary
- Asch’s studies showed participants would comply in public and answer questions correctly but privately disagree
The Asch Effect
is the influence of the group’s majority view on an individual’s judgment.
confederates
- each group of participants had only one true, naive subject that believes the confederates are uniformed participants like them
- in asch’s study, in confederates identified a line segment obviously shorter than the target line - wrong answer
participant’s choice
75% of participants conformed to group pressure at least once by choosing incorrect line because of group’s views
other factors that influence conformity
- public/private nature of responses: more likely to conform in public and vice versa
- task difficulty
cons
artificial situation- has low ecological validity
deception- real participants don’t know other participants were confederates
pros
laboratory setting ensured variables were strictly controlled meaning:
- can be repeated easily
- influence of extraneous variables can be minimised
confidence in Asch’s study
- A found participants that didn’t conform displayed confidence, participants who had confidence in their answer did not succumb to the groups pressure
- as easily
confidence in other studies 1
Perrin and Spencer (1980)
- carried out same A experiment, conformity rates not as high bc did it with engineering students perhaps because engineers were more confident in decision making
confidence in other studies 2
Wiensenthal et al.(1976)
- observed participants confident in ability to complete task less likely to conform
eagly and carli (1981)
b4 1970s- many psychologists felt women conformed more than men
but when e+c analysed conformity data, found inconsistencies in sex differences, they found the largest differences where group pressure was created
eagly (1987)
believed men and women showed different levels of conformity bc of diff. social roles
- W more likely to conform to avoid group conflict
- M less likely to conform bc expected to show independence and assertiveness
personal factors that may affect conformity according to Asch
- gender
- confidence