1. Semantics and Pragmatics Flashcards

1
Q

Semantics according to Morris

A

Semantics deals with the relation of signs to their designata and so to the objects they may denote

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Syntactics according to Morris

A

Syntactics deals with the relation of signs to one another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Pragmatics according to Morris

A

Pragmatics deals with the relation of signs to their interpreters

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Four areas of pragmatics according to Yule

A
  1. Pragmatics is the study of speaker meaning
  2. pragmatics is the study of contextual meaning
  3. Pragmatics is the study of how more gets communicated than is said
  4. Pragmatics is the study of the expression of relative distance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Pragmatics as the study of speaker meaning

A

P is concerned with the study of meaning as communicated by the speaker and interpreted by a listener

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Pragmatics as the study of contextual meaning

A

Study of what people mean in the particular context

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Pragmatics as the study of how more gets communicated than said

A

the investigation of invisible meaning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Pragmatics as the study of the expression of relative distance

A

what determines the choice between the said and unsaid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Division of labor between semantics and pragmatics

A

The semantic representation of a sentence is distinct from its pragmatics interpretation. Semantics is rule-governed and pragmatics is principle controlled.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Problem with semantics and pragmatics distinction

A

Even though we know that he is a third person singular for a male without referent we still don’t know who he is without a prior context and pragmatics without a prior context is not fully propositional and the truth condition cannot be stated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Message model

A

A linguistic communication between the transmitter and receiver.
Speaker communicating the message to the hearer who needs to decode the message by using the linguistic knowledge.
Successful when the receiver is able to decode the same message as encoded by the transmitter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Problems with the message model

A
  1. Ambiguity - the receiver must determine which of the possible meanings of an expression is the one that the transmitter wanted to communicate when the message is ambiguous
  2. Under determination of reference - the transmitter may want to communicate A but by not providing enough information the receiver interpret the message as B
  3. Under determination of communicative intention - transmitter’s communicative intention that is not determined by the meaning of the expression, but it is a part of the message communicated
  4. Non-linearity - not meaning what the speaker is literary saying (irony, sarcasm)
  5. Indirection - not communicating directly what the speaker wants to communicate
  6. Non-communicative acts - saying something without wanting to communicate anything
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Inferential model

A

IM takes into consideration that there are different ways of communicating the same message and also that the same words can mean something else

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Inferential meaning

A

the hearer is expected to infer the meaning based on contextual clues and prior knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Entailment

A
  • Not a pragmatic phenomenon
  • When reading a sentence there is something we know even though it is not explicitly mentioned but due to the semantics qualities
  • IF SENTENCE P ENTAILS SENTENCE Q IT MEANS THAT IF P IS TRUE THEN Q IS TRUE AND IF P IS FALSE THEN Q IS FALSE
  • But it doesn’t work the other way around (-if Q is true doesn’t mean the P is true)
  • Entailment CANNOT be cancelled: Peter killed the spider. The spider is not dead.
  • Entailment DOESN’T survive negation: Peter didn’t kill the spider. The spider died.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Presupposition

A
  • A pragmatic phenomenon
  • The phenomenon whereby people mark linguistically the information that is presupposed or taken for granted
  • People talking to each other assume some shared knowledge (geography)
17
Q

Common ground

A

The sum of information that people assume they share

18
Q

Presupposition triggers

A
Existential
Factive
Non-factive
Lexical
Structural
Counterfactual