1. Semantics and Pragmatics Flashcards
Semantics according to Morris
Semantics deals with the relation of signs to their designata and so to the objects they may denote
Syntactics according to Morris
Syntactics deals with the relation of signs to one another
Pragmatics according to Morris
Pragmatics deals with the relation of signs to their interpreters
Four areas of pragmatics according to Yule
- Pragmatics is the study of speaker meaning
- pragmatics is the study of contextual meaning
- Pragmatics is the study of how more gets communicated than is said
- Pragmatics is the study of the expression of relative distance
Pragmatics as the study of speaker meaning
P is concerned with the study of meaning as communicated by the speaker and interpreted by a listener
Pragmatics as the study of contextual meaning
Study of what people mean in the particular context
Pragmatics as the study of how more gets communicated than said
the investigation of invisible meaning
Pragmatics as the study of the expression of relative distance
what determines the choice between the said and unsaid
Division of labor between semantics and pragmatics
The semantic representation of a sentence is distinct from its pragmatics interpretation. Semantics is rule-governed and pragmatics is principle controlled.
Problem with semantics and pragmatics distinction
Even though we know that he is a third person singular for a male without referent we still don’t know who he is without a prior context and pragmatics without a prior context is not fully propositional and the truth condition cannot be stated
Message model
A linguistic communication between the transmitter and receiver.
Speaker communicating the message to the hearer who needs to decode the message by using the linguistic knowledge.
Successful when the receiver is able to decode the same message as encoded by the transmitter.
Problems with the message model
- Ambiguity - the receiver must determine which of the possible meanings of an expression is the one that the transmitter wanted to communicate when the message is ambiguous
- Under determination of reference - the transmitter may want to communicate A but by not providing enough information the receiver interpret the message as B
- Under determination of communicative intention - transmitter’s communicative intention that is not determined by the meaning of the expression, but it is a part of the message communicated
- Non-linearity - not meaning what the speaker is literary saying (irony, sarcasm)
- Indirection - not communicating directly what the speaker wants to communicate
- Non-communicative acts - saying something without wanting to communicate anything
Inferential model
IM takes into consideration that there are different ways of communicating the same message and also that the same words can mean something else
Inferential meaning
the hearer is expected to infer the meaning based on contextual clues and prior knowledge
Entailment
- Not a pragmatic phenomenon
- When reading a sentence there is something we know even though it is not explicitly mentioned but due to the semantics qualities
- IF SENTENCE P ENTAILS SENTENCE Q IT MEANS THAT IF P IS TRUE THEN Q IS TRUE AND IF P IS FALSE THEN Q IS FALSE
- But it doesn’t work the other way around (-if Q is true doesn’t mean the P is true)
- Entailment CANNOT be cancelled: Peter killed the spider. The spider is not dead.
- Entailment DOESN’T survive negation: Peter didn’t kill the spider. The spider died.