Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Bar prep - civ pro > 1 - Right court > Flashcards

1 - Right court Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
MBE flashcards
1
Q

personal jurisdiction

A

PJ is about the court’s power over the parties

Can P sue D IN THIS STATE?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

PJ - 2 step analysis

A
  1. Satisfy a state statute AND
  2. Satisfy the Constitution (Due Process)
    Same analysis for state and federal court.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

3 types of jurisdiction for PJ

A
  1. in personam
  2. in rem
  3. quasi in rem
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

PJ - in personam jurisdiction

A

P sues to impose a personal obligation on D

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

PJ - in personam jurisdiction

statutory analysis

A

On an essay, state that you need a state statute.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

PJ - in personam jurisdiction

constitutional analysis

A

Does D have “such minimum contacts with the forum so that jdx does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice?”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

PJ - in personam jurisdiction
constitutional analysis
What makes PJ clearly constitutional?

A

PJ is clearly constitutional if D is:

  1. domiciled in the forum OR
  2. consents OR
  3. is voluntarily present in the forum when served with process
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

PJ - in personam jurisdiction
constitutional analysis
What if PJ is not clearly constitutional based on domicile, consent, or voluntary presence?

A

IF PJ is not clearly constitutional based on domicile, consent, or voluntary presence, then assess 1) contact, 2) relatedness, and 3) fairness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

PJ - in personam jurisdiction
constitutional analysis
contact

A

There must be a relevant contact between D and the forum state.

  1. Contact must result from PURPOSEFUL AVAILMENT, which is D’s voluntary act.
    a. D must target or reach out to the forum.
    b. D can purposefully avail without setting foot in the forum.
  2. It must be FORESEEABLE that D could get sued in the forum.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

PJ - in personam jurisdiction
constitutional analysis
relatedness

A
  1. Does P’s claim arise from D’s contact with the forum?
    If so, the court has specific PJ.
    If not, then jdx is only ok if the court has general PJ so that D can be sued there for a claim that arose anywhere in the world.
    To have general PJ, D must be at home in the forum.
    A human is always at home in the forum where he is domiciled.
    A corporation is always at home 1) where incorporated and 2) where it has its PPB.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

PJ - in personam jurisdiction
constitutional analysis
relatedness - specific PJ v general PJ

A

General PJ - where D as at home in the forum and can be sued there for a claim that arose anywhere in the world.
Specific PJ - where D is not at home in the forum and can only be sued there for a claim arising from those activities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

PJ - in personam jurisdiction
constitutional analysis
fairness

A

ONLY ASSESS WITH SPECIFIC PJ
How to determine whether jdx is fair
1. Burden on D and witnesses - Does due process guarantee that the suit will be in the most convenient forum for D?
THE RELATIVE WEALTH OF THE PARTIES IS NOT DETERMINATIVE.
2. State’s interest - The forum state may want to provide a courtroom for its citizens who are allegedly being harmed by out-of-staters.
ALWAYS A STATE’S INTEREST IF P IS A CITIZEN OF THE FORUM
3. P’s interest - P may be injured and wants to sue at home.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

PJ - in personam jurisdiction

constitutional summary

A
  1. Contact - purposeful availment & foreseeability
  2. Relatedness - general PJ v specific PJ
  3. Fairness (specific PJ only) - burden/convenience, state’s interest, P’s interest
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

PJ - in rem and quasi in rem jdx

A

Power is not over D but D’s property.
Property must be attached by the court at the outset of the case.
To be constitutional, D’s contacts with the forum must meet the constitutional test.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

subject matter jurisdiction

A

SMJ is about the court’s power over the case.

Does P sue D in state or federal court?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

PJ v SMJ

A

PJ: PJ is about the court’s power over the parties
Can P sue D IN THIS STATE?
SMJ: SMJ is about the court’s power over the case.
When P sues D in this state, is it in state or federal court?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

SMJ - state v fed

A

State courts can hear any kinds of case - general SMJ.

Federal courts have limited SMJ - only diversity of citizenship (including alienage) or federal question.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

SMJ - diversity of citizenship and alienage

A

Diversity of citizenship - the case is between citizens of different states.
Alienage - the case is between a citizen of a state and a citizen of a foreign country

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

SMJ - complete diversity rule

A

No diversity if any P is a citizen of the same state as any D.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

SMJ - complete diversity rule for alienage

A

No diversity if P and D are both from foreign countries.
A green-card alien is considered an alien, except:
A special rule prohibits alienage if a green card alien is domiciled in the same U.S. state as a litigant on the other side of the case.
A U.S. citizen domiciled outside of the U.S. is not a citizen of any U.S. state and is not an alien.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

SMJ - citizenship of a natural person

A

The citizenship of a natural person who is a U.S. citizen has the citizenship of the U.S. state of her domicile.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

SMJ - citizenship of a natural person

domicile

A

Domicile is established with 1) physical presence AND 2) intent to make it your permanent home.
A human can be a citizen of only 1 state at a time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

SMJ - citizenship of a corporation

A

A corporation has the citizenship of 1) every state or country where incorporated AND 2) the ONE state or country of its PPB.
A corporation’s PPB is where managers DIRECT, COORDINATE, AND CONTROL corporate activities. (The nerve center - usually headquarters)
A corporation CAN be a citizen of more than 1 state at a time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

SMJ - citizenship of an unincorporated association (partnership, LLC)

A

The citizenship of an unincorporated association is the citizenship of ALL its members.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

SMJ - citizenship of decedents, minor, or incompetents

A

The citizenship of decedents, minors or incompetents is NOT the citizenship of the representative but rather that of the decedent, minor or incompetent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

SMJ - amount in controversy

A

In addition to complete diversity or alienage, P’s claim of amount in controversy (AiC) must be > $75K.
This does not include legal costs or interests on the claim, but it can include interest AS the claim.
Whatever P claims in good faith is ok UNLESS it is CLEAR TO A LEGAL CERTAINTY that P cannot recover more than $75K.
What P wins as a judgment is irrelevant to SMJ, even if it is less than $75K.

27
Q

SMJ - aggregation

A

Adding 2 or more claims to meet the AiC requirement.
Factually unrelated claims can be aggregated.
There is no limit to the number of claims that can be aggregated.
With joint claims, use the total value of the claim. The # of parties is irrelevant.

28
Q

SMJ - equitable relief

A

If either of the two tests for equitable relief are met, most courts will find equitable relief to be ok.

  1. P’s viewpoint - Is the loss in value to P > $75K?
  2. D’s viewpoint - Would it cost D > $75K to comply w/the injunction?
29
Q

SMJ - exclusions

A

Even if the requirements for a diversity or alienage case are met, fed cts decline to hear some cases.
Divorce, alimony, child custody, and probate on an estate are excluded cases (even if diversity requirements are met).

30
Q

federal question

A

The claim in P’s complaint “arises under federal law.”

Neither citizenship nor AiC are relevant under FQ.

31
Q

FQ - well-pleaded complaint rule

A

P’s claim must arise under federal law.
It is not enough that some federal issue is raised by the complaint.
P must be enforcing a federal right.

32
Q

FQ - Is P enforcing a federal right?

A

If so, case can go to fed ct under FQ jdx.

If not, case cannot go to fed ct under FQ.

33
Q

FQ - tort, K and property claims

A

Regular tort, K and property claims are usually state law claims, not federal law. If it is a federal claim, then the case would likely be a diversity case.

34
Q

SMJ over additional claims (including supplemental jdx)

A

Once a case is in fed ct, additional claims might be asserted in that case.
Each of these additional claims must be tested for federal SMJ - either diversity or FQ.
If an additional claim satisfies diversity or FQ, it can be heard in the fed ct case.

35
Q

SMJ over additional claims

What happens if the additional claim does not satisfy diversity or FQ?

A

Fed ct can still hear the claim IF it invokes supplemental jdx.

36
Q

supplemental jdx

A

Supplemental jdx gets claims into the case even though the claims do not meet diversity of citizenship and do not meet FQ.

37
Q

supplemental jdx - 2 steps

A

Two steps for supplemental jdx:
1. The claim we want to get into fed ct MUST SHARE a “common nucleus of operative fact” with the claim that invoked federal SMJ that got the case into fed ct.
ALWAYS MET when claim arises under same transaction or occurrence.
2. BUT in a diversity case, claims by plaintiffs cannot invoke supplemental jdx.
3. The only exception to this limitation is when there are multiple Ps and one of them does not meet the AiC requirement.

38
Q

removal

A

Removal transfers the case from state trial court to federal trial court.
D sued in state court may remove to fed ct.
If removal was improper, fed ct can remand the case back to state court.

39
Q

removal

When must D remove?

A

D must remove w/in 30 days of SERVICE (not filing) of the first paper that shows the case is removable. USUALLY that means w/in 30 days of service of process.

40
Q

removal

Who must join in the removal?

A

All D’s who have been served w/process must join in the removal.
The 30-day time clock can be restarted with service on a new D.

41
Q

removal

Who can remove?

A

Only D can remove.

P can never remove since P had the chance to initially file in fed ct.

42
Q

removal

What cases can be removed?

A
  1. D can remove a case that meets the requirements for diversity of citizenship or FQ.
  2. 2 big exceptions (apply ONLY if we are removing on the basis of diversity)
    a. No removal if any D is a citizen of the forum (in-state D rule) AND
    b. No removal more than a year after the case was filed in state court. (Exception: If the fed judge finds that P acted in bad faith by originally joining 2nd D to prevent removal.)
    Note: A case might become removable IF the claim against the in-state D is dropped.
43
Q

removal

Which federal district court will the removed case to?

A

D removes to the federal district “embracing” the state court where the case was filed.

44
Q

removal

How to remove a case

A
  1. D files “notice of removal” in federal court, stating grounds of removal which means federal SMJ (diversity or FQ).
    1a. If state law claim AiC $75K.
  2. In all cases, D attaches all documents that were served on her in state action. She serves a copy of the notice of removal on adverse parties. Then she files a copy of the “notice of removal” in state court.
45
Q

removal

remand

A

If P thinks the case should not have been removed, P moves to remand to state ct.
If other than lack of SMJ, P must move to remand no later than 30 days after notice of removal was filed in fed ct.
If lack of SMJ, P can move to remand anytime. (SMJ is never waived.)
If D removes a diversity case but there was an in-state D, P must move to remand w/in 30 days.

46
Q

Erie doctrine

A

Diversity case in fed ct and federal judge does not know whether to apply state law or federal law.

47
Q

Erie doctrine - step 1

A
  1. Is there some federal law (federal constitution, federal laws, FRCP) on point that directly conflicts with state law?
    If so, apply the federal law.
    (Based on Supremacy Clause)
48
Q

Erie doctrine - step 2

A
  1. If there is no federal law on point, fed judge must apply state law IF the issue is determined to be substantive.
49
Q

Erie doctrine

What 4 issues make an issue clearly substantive and require applying state law?

A
  1. elements of a claim or defense
  2. statute of limitations
  3. rules for tolling statutes of limitations
  4. conflict (or choice) of law rules
50
Q

Erie doctrine - step 3

A

If there is no federal law on point and the issue is not one of the four, the fed judge must determine whether the issue is substantive. The law is VERY unclear.

51
Q

Erie doctrine

What 3 factors does the court apply to know if the issue is substantive?

A
  1. Outcome determinative - would applying or ignoring the state rule affect the outcome of the case? If so, then substantive and apply state law.
  2. Balance of interests - does either federal or state system have a strong interest in having its rule applied?
  3. Avoid forum shopping - if fed ct ignores state law on this issue, will it cause parties to flock to fed ct? If so, then probably apply state law.
52
Q

Erie doctrine

general federal common law

A

Erie means there is no GENERAL federal common law.
General common law of Ks, torts and property is state law, and fed cts must apply that state substantive law in a diversity case.
BUT fed cts can make up common law on their own.

53
Q

Venue v PJ v SMJ

A

PJ: PJ is about the court’s power over the parties
Can P sue D IN THIS STATE?
SMJ: SMJ is about the court’s power over the case.
When P sues D in this state, is it in state or federal court?
Venue: Venue is exactly which federal court the case will be heard in.

54
Q

Venue - basic choices

A

P may lay venue in ANY DISTRICT WHERE:
1. ALL Ds reside
1a. If all Ds reside in different districts of the same forum state, P can lay venue in the district where any D resides.
OR
2. A substantial part of the claim arose

55
Q

Venue

Where do Ds reside for venue purposes?

A
  1. A human resides in the district where domiciled (one).

2. A business resides in ALL districts where subject to PJ.

56
Q

Venue

transfer

A

A federal district court may transfer the case to another federal district court.
Transferor - the original district court
Transferee - the district court to which the case is sent
Transferee must be a proper venue AND have PJ over D

57
Q

Venue

transfer rules

A
  1. Ct can xfer to any district (even an improper venue) if:
    a. ALL parties consent (but unlikely that P will do so) AND
    b. The court finds cause for the xfer.
  2. If the original district is a proper venue, that court can order xfer based on convenience of parties AND on interest of justice.
58
Q

Venue

Is there a right to xfer?

A

No, xfer is discretionary.

If we xfer in a diversity case, t’ee applies law that t’or would apply.

59
Q

Venue

What factors does ct look to in deciding whether to xfer the case?

A

Xfer overrides P’s choice of forum (b/c P chose a proper venue).
Burden is on the person seeking xfer.
Public and private factors showing that t’ee is the center of gravity are factors the court looks to.
Public factors - what law applies, what community should be burdened with jury service, desire to keep a local controversy in the local court
Private factors - convenience, where evidence and witnesses are.

60
Q

Venue

If original district is an improper venue, what may that court do?

A
  1. Dismiss
  2. Xfer in the interest of justice
    2a. If we xfer, t’ee does not apply law t’or.
61
Q

Forum non conveniens (FNC)

A

Like xfer, another court is the center of gravity that makes more sense than the present court.
However, with FNC, the court does not xfer to a more convenient court but either dismisses or stays the case.

62
Q

FNC - stay

A

Hold in abeyance (nothing happens in the case)
P will probably sue in another court because the more convenient court is in a different judicial system so xfer is impossible.

63
Q

FNC - decision

A

Decision for FNC is based on the same public and private factors as transfer.
This requires a STRONG showing since this results in dismissal or stay.
Hardly ever granted if P is resident of present forum.
Other court must be available and adequate. P must get day in court.

Bar prep - civ pro (6 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions