1. Relevance Flashcards

1
Q

Intro:

A

Relevant evidence may be admissible. Irrelevant evidence is inadmissible.

Limitations on relevance:
Evidence can have high relevance but low probative value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Discretionary exclusion of relevant evidence

A

BALANCING TEST: To exclude relevant evidence, probative value must be substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice.

Examples of relevant evidence that is excluded:
♣ Emotionally disturbing
♣ Repetitive or confusing
♣ Admissible for one purpose but inadmissible for another

Unfair surprise to a party is not a valid ground for excluding relevant evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Exclusion of relevant evidence on public policy grounds

A
  1. Liability insurance
    ♣ Not admissible to prove fault or a party’s ability to pay damages (admissible to prove anything else e.g. ownership, control).
  2. Subsequent remedial measures
    ♣ evidence of repairs or other remedial measures taken after an injury is inadmissible to prove fault, defect or inadequate warning.
    • Admissible to rebut defense that there was no feasible precaution.
  3. Settlements, offers to settle, & plea bargaining
    ♣ Civil: compromises, settlement offers are inadmissible to prove liability/fault
    ♣ Criminal: pleas, offers to plea and related statements are inadmissible to prove guilt
  4. Payment or offers to pay medical expense
    ♣ inadmissible to prove liability for injuries
    • related statements like factual admissions are admissible
    ♣ offers to pay medical expenses in return for release of liability are inadmissible (aka settlement offer)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Similar Occurrence:

A

Evidence of prior similar occurances involving time, event or person is often inadmissible.

But admissible to prove:

  1. Causation
  2. Prior accidents
  3. Intent or absence of mistake
  4. To rebute a defense of impossibility
  5. Value (similar transaction price)
  6. Industry custom
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Habit:

A

May be relevant and admissible to show that the person acted in conformity with that habit on that occasion. (must be highly specific and frequently repeated).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly