1. Relevance Flashcards
Intro:
Relevant evidence may be admissible. Irrelevant evidence is inadmissible.
Limitations on relevance:
Evidence can have high relevance but low probative value
Discretionary exclusion of relevant evidence
BALANCING TEST: To exclude relevant evidence, probative value must be substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice.
Examples of relevant evidence that is excluded:
♣ Emotionally disturbing
♣ Repetitive or confusing
♣ Admissible for one purpose but inadmissible for another
Unfair surprise to a party is not a valid ground for excluding relevant evidence.
Exclusion of relevant evidence on public policy grounds
- Liability insurance
♣ Not admissible to prove fault or a party’s ability to pay damages (admissible to prove anything else e.g. ownership, control). - Subsequent remedial measures
♣ evidence of repairs or other remedial measures taken after an injury is inadmissible to prove fault, defect or inadequate warning.
• Admissible to rebut defense that there was no feasible precaution. - Settlements, offers to settle, & plea bargaining
♣ Civil: compromises, settlement offers are inadmissible to prove liability/fault
♣ Criminal: pleas, offers to plea and related statements are inadmissible to prove guilt - Payment or offers to pay medical expense
♣ inadmissible to prove liability for injuries
• related statements like factual admissions are admissible
♣ offers to pay medical expenses in return for release of liability are inadmissible (aka settlement offer)
Similar Occurrence:
Evidence of prior similar occurances involving time, event or person is often inadmissible.
But admissible to prove:
- Causation
- Prior accidents
- Intent or absence of mistake
- To rebute a defense of impossibility
- Value (similar transaction price)
- Industry custom
Habit:
May be relevant and admissible to show that the person acted in conformity with that habit on that occasion. (must be highly specific and frequently repeated).