1. Regional Disparity and Policies Flashcards

1
Q

What are the regional disparities in Europe?

A

Eastern europe GDP/capita lowest, 6200-14000

Central Europe and Scandanavia the best, 30-80,000

Spain, France, Portugal middle - 13-30,000

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the GDP/pc within countires?

A

France wide - 9000 - 60,000

Hungary 9000 - 30,000

Belgium 25-69000

Ireland 27-85,000

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the European employment rates spread in EU

A

80% in most of west and central europe, further east 30-65%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the incmoe disparities in UK?

A

Highest in south - 35-75,000

Midlands around 10-25,000

North gets richer 25-35,000

Schotrland poorer - 10-25,000

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the richest and poorest areas in Northern Europe?

A

Richest - London, Luxermbourg, Brussels

Interestingly, poorest:
- West wales
- Cornwall
- Durham
- Lincolnshire
- Northern Ireland
- Yorkshire
9 of the 10 are in the UK

Regions in the UK:
- London centric nation devastatingly unequal - inner london richest region, yet nine of 10 poorest regions also in the UK.
- UK is the only country in the G7 group of leading economies where inequality has increased this century

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the standard neoclassical growth model?

A

Solow model; assumptions:
- One good and two factors (L and K)
- Ideas and technology affect productivity of factors
- Production function has constant returns, positive and diminishing marginal products
- Part of income saved, invested to generate capital
- Capital depreciates over time
- Population is growing

Predictions:
1. Capital/labour ratio and per capita income increases with saving rate and level of productivity, depreciates with depreciation rate and population growth
2. Given any initial capital level, economy converges to steady state
3. Suppose countries share same tech in long run, differ in terms of saving behaviour and fertilty, observed cross country income and productivity differences explained by differences in savings rates and population

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the impotance of the savings/investment rate?

A

Income level of poor countrie scatch up/converge towards income levels of rich countries if they have similar savings rates for capital as a share of output - conditional convergence
- Economic integration implies capital flows from rich regions to poor regions
- Investment rates in human capital also crucial for technological progress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the new geography mechanism?

A
  • Integration could worsen regions problems:
    Mechanisms
  • New geography - location matters - cenral regions at advantage
    This is the central and periperal theory

Using Belgium (central) and spain (peripheral)
- Assumes production costs lower in spain due to EofS and expensive to produce, also shipment costs
- Reducing shipment cost does not necessarily cause production to move to low cost location

From high to low -> production shifts to spain

From high to medium - > production shifts to belgium

High barriers to trade encourage local production, moderate barriers interacting with EofS may encourage concentration in high cost locations due to good market access instead of low cost locations

Implication: integration could worsen the position of periphery countries with medium shipping csots, but benefit the periphery if it went far enough - low shipping costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the new economic geography models??

A

Agglomeration forces - concentration, regional imbalance

Dispersional - congestion, high rent, land prices, competition - leads to decentralisation

Agglomeration:
- Increasing returns to scale - greater efficiency as firms move from small to large scale operations

Positive externalities:
- Increasing accessibility helps local firms
- Foreign firms demonstrating up to date technology to locals

Agglomeration forces:
- Incentives to concentrate production close to largest market: scale economies realised, transport costs are lower

Lead to concentration and regional imbalances:
- Technological spillover
- Labour market pooling - improve connection between firms and workers to improve efficiency of hiring
- Demand linkages
- Supply linkages

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the model of tech sourcing in silicon valley?

A

Construction of technology core created - 10 zip codes in San Francisco Bay

While unrestricted in design, primary tech sourcing zones all contained in th ecore - small zones, overlapping regions with directional transmission

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the model of demand linkages?

A
  1. Industry moving to a big region
  2. Expenditure shifts - workers spend in big regions instead of small regions
  3. Market size effects - big market bigger, small smaller
  4. Production shift - due to trade costs, firms prefer to locate in big markets, meaning more industry moves to the big region
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the model of supply linkages?

A
  1. Some industry moves to big region
  2. Production shifts - migrated firms cheaper in big region, dearer in small regions
  3. Costs shift - wide range of local goods make big region a cheaper place to produce
  4. Production shifts - firms move from small to big markets attracted by the lower costs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are dispersion forces?

A

COngestion, higher rent and land prices and ocmpetition lead to decentralisation

Congestion and travel time:
- Discourages firms from living in central areas due to higher cost and inaccessibility

Model of London:
- Central london can barely move anywhere in 30 minutes, much more the next 30 minutes and then much more last 30 but crazy
- Housing cost model similar effect - more expensive in middle

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Example of new economic geographical model

A

Initial equilition - two identical regions, same population

By chance, equilibrium changes due to migration, one larger than other

Incentives:
- Economies of scale, external economies - creates accelerator where more economies move, raises real wages further, more migration etc.

Counteracting forces: if all firms located in one large region, may be incentived to move to periphery to become monopolist

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is portage and path dependence?

A

Questioned whether the distribution of population was determined by nature or path dependence

Context of cities in NA forming due to water navigation - potage sites attract commerce and services - water power, manufacturing and industrialisation

Initial advantage:
- Examined sites in US
- Found original advantages long obselete, exists continuing importance of historical portage sites

Path dependence key, especially during settlement of NA - waterborne transport important
- Port was focal point of commerce - hard to stop due to natural obstacles but ports offered easy opportunity
- Later railways and other power sources took over

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Sum up regional differences

A

Economic integration make small initial differences intensified

Prosperous regions improve in virtuous circle
- Advantage for indsutry to clutter
- High incomes attract new industry

On other hand, poor regions decline - vicious circle
- Selective out migration - brain drain
- Low growth and investment
- Outdated technology

17
Q

Reasons for government intervention

A

Rich countries aid poor neighbours
- Equaility
-POlitical reasons
- Self interest - future exports investments

18
Q

What are the channels of intervention

A
  • Phsysical capita
  • Research and development
  • Provision of public education and training
  • Income transfers
19
Q

Why is there a common EU regional policy

A
  • Coordinate assistance
  • ENcourage critical mass of assistance - free riding
  • Influence recipients policy on large scale
  • Political solidarity

New economic model recognises agllomeration and dispersion forces - small effects intensified, need of government intervention

20
Q

What is the EU regional policy:

A

34% of EU budget, used for national projects
- Funds largely pre allocated, poorest get most

Concern for disadvantage regions - funding for less favoured regions began in 1973

European Regional Development fund redistribute mney to poorest region

Goals:
- Cohesion is more central concern, more economically diverse
- NOt simple transfer of money, which would only reduce disparities in the short term

Investments in capital - objectives:
- COnvergence - reduce income differences (82% funds) for regions with GDP/person less than 75% EU average
- Regional competitiveness and employment - 16% of funds
- Territorial cooperation at cross border transnational level - 2% of dfunds

21
Q

How is the regional policy funded?

A

European Regional development fund:
- Innovation R&D
- Support for small enterprises
- Low carbon economy

European social fund:
- Improving employment and education
- Reducing people at risk of poverty

Cohesion fund:
- Countries GNI less than 90% eu average
- Trans european transport networks
- Environemnt

EUropean Agricultural Fund for RUral Development

European Maritime and Fisheries Fund

22
Q

What was the impact of regional policy?

A
  • All poor regions get transfers
  • Negative correlation between per capita income and transfers
  • Need to allocate transfers to some poor regions and not others, chec whether there are differences
  • Politically infeasible

Seems to be a placebo effect, some benefit, others get the placebo

Randomised control trials:
- Better service availability and tronger incentives improved vaccination rates:

  1. No growth effects beyond the short term consumption stimulu
  2. Posiitve effect to attract high tech industries at the expense of medium skilled industries
  3. Positive gorwth and incomes only for regions with human capital endownments and without corruption/weak administrative