1. Nature of Crime Flashcards

1
Q

What is crime?

A

An act or an omission that results in the harm of society and is punishable by the state and the law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who prosecutes crimes?

A

The state, as crimes are seen to harm society.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the two elements of a criminal offence that the prosecution must prove?

A
  • Actus Reus: the guilty act
  • Mens Rea: the guilty mind
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define Actus Reus.

A

The physical performance or the conduct element of a criminal act.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define Mens Rea.

A

The mental state or intent of the defendant at the time of the crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the three main levels of mens rea?

A
  • Intention
  • Recklessness
  • Criminal Negligence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does intention in mens rea refer to?

A

Clear, malicious, or wilful intention.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does recklessness in mens rea refer to?

A

The accused was aware that their action could lead to a crime being committed but chose to take that risk anyway.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What does criminal negligence in mens rea refer to?

A

The accused fails to foresee the risk where they should have, allowing avoidable danger to occur.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is doli incapax?

A

The common law presumption that a child aged 10-14 is incapable of criminal intent unless proven otherwise.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

In doli incapax cases, who has the onus of rebutting the presumption?

A

The state must disprove a lack of intent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the outcome of R v LMW regarding doli incapax?

A

The jury found the accused not guilty of manslaughter due to the presumption of doli incapax.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the reasonable person test?

A

The test by which courts judge the criminality of an act, assessing what a reasonable person would have done in the same circumstances.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the presumption of innocence?

A

The principle that the prosecution must prove guilt; the defendant does not prove their innocence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are strict liability offences?

A

Minor offences where the prosecution does not need to prove mens rea; proof of the act alone is sufficient.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Which offence requires only actus reus to be proven?

A

Strict liability offences.

17
Q

Fill in the blank: The actus reus must be _______.

A

[voluntary]

18
Q

In the context of causation, what is the ‘but for’ test?

A

A test to determine if the act was the substantial cause of the harm.

19
Q

What is the significance of R v Blaue in terms of causation?

A

It established that the act must be the substantial cause of the harm, not the victim’s subsequent actions.

20
Q

What is the purpose of mandatory minimum sentences in NSW?

A

To reduce the discretion judges have in determining sentences.

21
Q

What was the outcome of the Loveridge case?

A

Loveridge was sentenced to 7 years and 2 months for manslaughter.

22
Q

True or False: The prosecution must prove both mens rea and actus reus beyond a reasonable doubt.

23
Q

What is the outcome for defendants found not guilty by reason of mental illness?

A

They are detained indefinitely under mental health legislation.

24
Q

What is the key difference between actus reus and mens rea?

A

Actus reus refers to the physical act, while mens rea refers to the mental intent.

25
Q

What happens if a defendant claims a lack of mens rea?

A

They may argue that they did not have the necessary intent to commit the crime.