Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

A Level Philosophy > 1. Introduction to Philosophy of Religion > Flashcards

1. Introduction to Philosophy of Religion Flashcards

1
Q

What do Buddhists believe about God?

A

he is not omnipotent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What do Buddhists believe is the way to achieve Nirvana?

A

by breaking the cycle of rebirth & achieving enlightenment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What distinguishes Nirvana from Heaven?

A

Nirvana is a state of eternal being, the end of suffering, with no desires & no individual.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who do Mahayana Buddhists worship?

A

Mahayana Buddhists worship bodhisattvas, who are god-like figures that have gained enlightenment however take intention to stay in the world to help others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What role do bodhisattvas play in Buddhism?

A

Bodhisattvas are enlightened beings who have chosen to help others achieve enlightenment rather than entering Nirvana themselves.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is Manjushri in Tibetan Buddhism?

A

Manjushri is a representation of the bodhisattvas & symbolises the wisdom & compassion of Buddha.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Who is Avalokiteshvara in Buddhism?

A

Avalokiteshvara is a bodhisattva representing compassion & is worshiped in various forms of Buddhism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does the goddess Tara represent?

A

Tara is worshipped for her compassion, which reflects the compassion of the Buddha.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How is the Buddha worshipped in Buddhism?

A

the Buddha (Siddhartha Gautama) is worshipped not as a God but as a human who gained enlightenment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the majority of Western philosophy (of religion) concerned with?

A

attempting to prove the existence of God, or at least to show that belief in God is logically coherent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why does part of Western philosophy (of religion) conflict with Judaeo-Christian theism?

A

the question of God’s existence (or perhaps, more importantly, his non-existence), is not an issue with Islam

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does “At Ta’eel” mean in Islam?

A
  • denial of Allah’s perfection or attributes
  • failing to worship Allah
  • associating others with Allah (shirk)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Describe the actions that define “At Ta’eel”

A
  • denying Allah’s attributes
  • worshipping other gods or humans alongside Allah (shirk)
  • claiming the world can be explained without reference to Allah
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How is the denial of Allah’s 99 names viewed in Islam?

A

it is considered “At Ta’eel” & a denial of Allah’s perfection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is “shirk” in Islam?

A

worshipping other gods or human beings alongside Allah

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Why are debates about the existence of God not tolerated in Islam?

A

they are considered blasphemous

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

How does Islam view explaining the world without reference to Allah?

A

it is seen as “At Ta’eel,” a denial of Allah

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Where did the problem of God’s existence originate from?

A

the philosophical preoccupation with proof & evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Describe the example of the teacher to explain arguments about God’s existence

A
  • it is not necessary for a teacher to prove her existence to her students because she is so overwhelming obvious to them
  • there are constant physical, empirical indications of the teacher’s existence that students pick up through use of their physical senses: she can be seen, heard, touched & perceived as a set of sense data
  • the students have no reason to believe that they are deceived by any of these data and, although they may come to know other less overwhelmingly obvious things about the teacher, the fact that their relationship is clearly being acted in the physical world is the primary basis for the knowledge & understanding her
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Compare the argument of God’s existence to the example of the teacher

A
  • God cannot be known in this way
  • although believers may claim that they hear God and speak to him, that they feel him in their lives in a vivid & real way, that experience can never be the same as their experience of another human being who exists in the spatiotemporal (space-time) world
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is used in Islam to represent God & why?

A

Islamic calligraphy is used to express the nature of God since pictorial images of God & his works are forbidden in Islam

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What limitations do we face in reaching conclusions about God?

A

our experience & reasoning powers are limited because they are human

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Why might the evidence of our senses by insufficient for proving the existence of God?

A

the evidence of our senses may not lead to conclusive proof

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is required when relying on the testimony of others about the existence of God?

A

we must be convinced that their interpretation of the evidence is correct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What has the awareness of our limited reasoning led to in the context of proving God’s existence?

A

it has led to the development of the formal proofs that employ logical processes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What do formal proofs for the existence of God aim to demonstrate?

A

they aim to demonstrate the reasonableness of belief in God

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Are formal proofs for the existence of God universally accepted?

A

no, they are open to considerable criticism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Which two interpretations are commonly used to explain belief in God?

A
  • propositional
  • non-propositional
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Explain propositional belief in God

A

the belief that there is an objective reality to which we ascribe the term God, & that we can make claims about him which themselves are objectively true

30
Q

Explain non-propositional belief in God

A
  • a trust in God that may be held even when evidence or experience would seem to point against it
  • this kind of faith must be based in some personal knowledge of God, & not simply in accepting facts about him
31
Q

What example can we use to illustrate non-propositional faith?

A

Basil Mitchell uses the Parable of the Partisan & the Stranger to illustrate the nature of non-propositional faith

32
Q

What are partisans also known as?

A

terrorists

33
Q

In the parable, who does the partisan meet?

A

a stranger who claims to be the leader of resistance

34
Q

What does the stranger urge the partisan to do?

A

to have faith in him whatever the circumstances, even if the stranger’s actions appear to contradict his claim

35
Q

How does the partisan respond to the stranger’s actions that come across as conflicting towards his interests?

A

he remains committed to his belief in the stranger’s integrity, believing that the stranger is still on his side

36
Q

What do the partisan’s friends think of his faith in the stranger?

A

they think he is a fool for holding onto his belief in the stranger

37
Q

What gives the partisan confidence to maintain his faith in the stranger?

A

the original encounter with the stranger gave him sufficient confidence to hold on to his faith, even when evidence counted against it

38
Q

What does the Parable of the Partisan demonstrate?

A

the problem of talking meaningfully about belief in God, because the believer has not allowed anything to count against his faith

39
Q

Why is it difficult to talk meaningfully about belief in God according to the parable?

A

because the believer maintains faith regardless of contradicting evidence, similar to the partisan’s faith in the stranger

40
Q

Despite the problem of proving God’s existence, what have religious believers & philosophers done?

A

they have continued to pose formal proofs that address many of the atheist’s challenges

41
Q

What two categories do most arguments for the existence of God fall into?

A
  • a priori
  • a posteriori
42
Q

What are “a priori” arguments?

A

arguments which are entirely conceptual

43
Q

What are “a posteriori” arguments?

A

arguments which are essentially world based

44
Q

What is the ontological argument?

A

the ontological argument reasons from the definition of God to his necessary existence

45
Q

Which category does the ontological argument fall into?

A

the ontological argument falls into the “a priori” category

46
Q

What does it mean if God has necessary existence?

A

it means that God cannot not exist, i.e. it is impossible to conceive of him not existing

47
Q

What is the nature of beings other than God according to the text?

A

all other beings are contingent, meaning they may or may not exist

48
Q

How do contingent beings relate to God according to the concept of necessary existence?

A

contingent beings necessarily depend on God for their own existence

49
Q

What might atheists argue about believers’ acceptance of evidence against God?

A

Atheists may argue that since believers do not allow anything to count against their belief in God, all arguments are flawed

50
Q

Why do atheists believe that criticisms raised against believers will not carry real weight?

A

because believers do not allow anything to count against their belief in God, thus dismissing any criticisms

51
Q

What do some atheists claim about the conclusions of theists compared to their own?

A

that their conclusions are just as likely as theists’ conclusions

52
Q

What challenge do some atheists point out about theistic & atheistic conclusions?

A

that there is no way of verifying or falsifying either theistic or atheistic conclusions

53
Q

What does Psalm 14:1 say about the existence of God?

A

the psalmist wrote: ‘The fool has said in his heart there is no God’ (Psalm 14:1), effectively dismissing the need to prove the existence of God because it was foolishness to deny it

54
Q

Compare the writings (about the existence of God) of biblical and classical theists

A

however, although God may have been overwhelmingly obvious to the biblical writers, the philosophical tradition of classical theism has consistently tackled the need to prove the existence of a being who is beyond time & space

55
Q

What are the most common two categories (of arguments) that appeal to the world as proof of God’s existence?

A
  • cosmological
  • teleological
56
Q

What does cosmological refer to?

A

the existence of the world as deeming an explanation

57
Q

What does teleological refer to?

A

features of the world such as order & purpose but also its fittingness for human life & its aesthetic (beautiful) appearance

58
Q

Other than cosmological & teleological arguments, what other types of arguments are occasionally offered to prove God’s existence?

A

moral arguments, arguments from human consciousness, and religious experience

59
Q

What does the moral argument conclude about God?

A

that God is the necessary source of moral obligation

60
Q

List the seven factors the philosopher Richard Swinburne uses to suggest cumulative (growing) arguments towards the existence of God

A
  • the very existence of the universe
  • the fact that the universe is ordered
  • the existence of consciousness
  • human opportunities to do good
  • the pattern of history
  • the evidence of miracles
  • religious experience
61
Q

What does Swinburne suggest the cumulative argument does for the probability of God’s existence?

A

it increases the probability of God’s existence by counterbalancing the weaknesses of one argument with the strengths of another

62
Q

What must be questioned for every argument of God’s existence?

A

whether the argument lives up to the standards applied to other philosophical arguments

63
Q

What two qualities should an argument for the existence of God possess?

A

it should be valid, and it’s premises should be true

64
Q

Why might an argument for the existence of God appeal to some but not to others?

A

the nature of the subject of the proof leaves it open questions of truth & validity

65
Q

What is the goal of some attempts to establish the rationality of God’s existence? Explain its significance along with examples.

A
  • to show that it is rational or reasonable to believe that God exists, not necessarily to prove it
  • these attempts have also been popular in Western theistic philosophy
  • examples include “Pascal’s Wager” & the arguments of thinker Alvin Plantinga
66
Q

What is “Pascal’s Wager”?

A

it argues that even if God’s existence cannot be proven, it is more prudent (wise) to gamble on his existence to avoid the potential consequences of being wrong

67
Q

What is a “properly basic belief” according to Alvin Plantinga?

A

a belief in God that does not need external proof but is non-foundation, with religious experience possibly supporting it

68
Q

Why are proofs for God’s existence still offered despite the idea of basic belief?

A

because explanations are needed for certain phenomena within the universe that are not self-explanatory & require external explanation

69
Q

What is seen to be a possibility to show that the non-existence of God is logically impossible?

A
  • i.e. that it is impossible to conceive of his non-existence
  • this could be claimed from an explanation of the term ‘God’, which Anselm stated contained everything that was necessary to know about God, including the indisputable fact of his existence
70
Q

What is the significance of the universe being religiously ambiguous?

A
  • because the universe is religiously ambiguous it can be interpreted in religious or non-religious ways
  • arguments for the existence of God seek to demonstrate that the most satisfactory way of interpreting the universe is by reference to God
71
Q

How should arguments for the existence of God always be thought as?

A

in terms of proof

A Level Philosophy (2 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions